collapse

Resources

Stud of St. John's Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1
Parham1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: @ DePaul

Marquette
68
Marquette @
DePaul
Date/Time: Jan 17, 2026, 7:30pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
St. John's
92

Warrior of Law

Next year's team will be younger than this year's team particularly if Jones and Norman are not invited back. There has been minimal growth by Parham, Hamilton, and Owens and there's zero reason to believe they'll improve. Next year's team will be reliant the current frosh, recruits and redshirts. This may take a few seasons. Someone convince me otherwise before I renew for next season.
"You can only protect your liberties in this world by protecting the other man's freedom. You can only be free if I am free."  Clarence Darrow

mileskishnish72

Depends on what our coach does in March and April.

Johnny B


wadesworld

If no legitimate Big East rotational pieces are added through the portal and there are no unexpected departures, they'll be better but not good enough to even be on the bubble.

You can build around Nigel.  I'd expect Egbuonu to be one of the better players on the team if the above is the case.  The ceiling would depend on whether Sheek can contribute right away and whether Stevens and Parham progress to legitimate Big East rotational players.


Galway Eagle

On one hand we won with Kam, Stevie, Justin, Oso, Omax & Tyler playing a lot of minutes as freshmen/sophomores

Though that group had Darryl, Gregg, & Kur to be a steadying presence. So the question to me is whether anyone who'd be an upper classmen could replicate the contributions those three gave us.

Instinct is no we'll be the same or worse in 26/27 as it stands now.
Retire Terry Rand's jersey!

Tha Hound

Not unless Shaka hits the portal, which I have to imagine he will.

#UnleashMalik

Quote from: Galway Eagle on Today at 03:42:31 PMOn one hand we won with Kam, Stevie, Justin, Oso, Omax & Tyler playing a lot of minutes as freshmen/sophomores

Though that group had Darryl, Gregg, & Kur to be a steadying presence. So the question to me is whether anyone who'd be an upper classmen could replicate the contributions those three gave us.

Instinct is no we'll be the same or worse in 26/27 as it stands now.

It would actually be incredibly hard to beat whatever record marquette finishes with this season. Surely they'll play a much weaker non conference.

CountryRoads

Need 8/9 rotational players:

1. Nigel
2.
3.
4.
5. Parham
6. Stevens
7. Sheek
8. Egbuono
9. Existing player on this team

List is basically minutes ranking or player ranking, whatever.

Nigel somewhere in the top 4. Ideally the others listed would be in the 5-8 range for next year. So, need 3 new players who would be in our top 4 to compete for a bid. Once you start promoting players who belong in 5-8 range up to 1-4 range, that's how you end up with seasons like this. Exactly what happened this year.

Looks expensive though. I guess that's the cost of completely whiffing on multiple recruiting classes.

BM1090

Quote from: Warrior of Law on Today at 03:06:50 PMNext year's team will be younger than this year's team particularly if Jones and Norman are not invited back. There has been minimal growth by Parham, Hamilton, and Owens and there's zero reason to believe they'll improve. Next year's team will be reliant the current frosh, recruits and redshirts. This may take a few seasons. Someone convince me otherwise before I renew for next season.

Parham has shown clear improvement. Owens shows flashes. Agree on Hamilton.

To answer your question, yes I think there is reason to believe they'll be better. They are better than they were 3 weeks ago, and I'd except they keep improving. How much? Who knows.

MarquetteMike1977

#10
Quote from: CountryRoads on Today at 04:02:54 PMNeed 8/9 rotational players:

1. Nigel
2.
3.
4.
5. Parham
6. Stevens
7. Sheek
8. Egbuono
9. Existing player on this team

List is basically minutes ranking or player ranking, whatever.

Nigel somewhere in the top 4. Ideally the others listed would be in the 5-8 range for next year. So, need 3 new players who would be in our top 4 to compete for a bid. Once you start promoting players who belong in 5-8 range up to 1-4 range, that's how you end up with seasons like this. Exactly what happened this year.

Looks expensive though. I guess that's the cost of completely whiffing on multiple recruiting classes.


Believe Marquette will be better since it is difficult to imagine us being any worse.
The people I know who have seen Sheek play are bullish on him and feel he may start.
Also feel Nash Walker will be a rotational player.

Previous topic - Next topic