collapse

Resources

Stud of Seton Hall Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Losing the Fight by panda
[Today at 08:44:29 PM]


What We Knew Is Now Official by wisblue
[Today at 07:59:17 PM]


A Collective Failure by SOSW
[Today at 07:48:11 PM]


Path to Success 2025-26 in 2026: Rotations by SOSW
[Today at 07:01:28 PM]


Ben Gold Post Game 12/30 by WhiteTrash
[Today at 05:36:16 PM]


The Altercation by wadesworld
[Today at 03:43:17 PM]


Happy New Year by Viper
[Today at 01:29:16 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: @ UConn

Marquette
73
Marquette @
UConn
Date/Time: Jan 4, 2026, 1:00pm
TV: NBC
Schedule for 2025-26
Seton Hall
79

Viper

Quote from: HutchwasClutch on Today at 09:26:13 AMThis continues to be said here now and then and it's astounding.  If someone was brought in here with the express intent to ruin this program, they couldn't have done better.  Because anyone can see things are not looking up for future seasons because we've got players sitting out with major injuries or have 2 or 3 or whatever top 30 recruits coming on board. 

No competent coach does what Shaka's done to bring us where we sit today.  And that place is one of, if not THE worst team in modern program history.  There's no excuse for what he's done.  It's not just an off season or rebuilding year, it's egregiously bad and negligent handling of a major college program. 
well said
Support CBP 🇺🇸

Viper

Quote from: HutchwasClutch on Today at 09:57:37 AMRight, it's 💯 on every player their underperformance.  Shaka got "burned" by each and every one of them.  Do you hear yourself and how nonsensical that is?? He's the one after all that came up with RGV.  The G part of that is most certainly his to impact.  Some kids won't live up to expectations.  That's the reality of college sports.  But when everyone falls short, sort of indicative of a much deeper problem, right?

 That and his and his staff evaluations of a few guys were completely off base.  Which Shaka owns completely.  It's not the kids fault if they were brought in and have no business playing at this level (Tre Norman). 
also well said
Support CBP 🇺🇸

Viper

Quote from: HutchwasClutch on Today at 02:19:38 PMI never said nor implied it's a "dream program".  And you know that.  I merely stated what reality is and that is it's a very good job with plenty of resources to win at consistently.  Period.  I feel confident that would be a widely held consensus opinion of our program for those that follow college basketball outside our program.

I would probably still give Shaka one more chance to start using the portal. But there's always coaches who are good but no longer feeling the love where they are or other circumstances going on and that largely is unknown until the coaching turnover cycle gets in full motion.  Did Villanova fans really think they'd poach Willard out of Maryland last year at this time? Or did anyone predict Buzz would be ready to move on again from his home state already?

There's possibilities no one sees coming and we're more than of enough stature in the landscape to take advantage. It's the old COLE mindset that Shaka's the best we can ever do.  Especially how badly he's managed things that have led to this season.

hat trick!!!
Support CBP 🇺🇸

Vander Blue Man Group

#28
Quote from: rocky_warrior on December 31, 2025, 08:59:56 PMThe idea of NOT pulling redshirts is extremely dumb if those players have a higher ceiling.  Shaka's players that could have had a fifth year have either transferred, or left for the NBA.

No, it remains extremely dumb.  There's a reason those guys are redshirting and it's because they were not ready to help this team win from a physical or skills perspective. 

Even if the possibility of Miletic or Sheek being here for a 5th year is low they may want to play a 5th year elsewhere.

There's no benefit to wasting a year of eligibility in a lost season.  None. 

Farley36

Quote from: rocky_warrior on December 31, 2025, 08:59:56 PMThe idea of NOT pulling redshirts is extremely dumb if those players have a higher ceiling.  Shaka's players that could have had a fifth year have either transferred, or left for the NBA.

Don't bother, VBMG is the dumbest of the dumb.

Biggie Clausen

Quote from: Vander Blue Man Group on Today at 02:54:01 PMNo, it remains extremely dumb.  There's a reason those guys are redshirting and it's because they were not ready to help this team win from a physical or skills perspective. 

Even if the possibility of Miletic or Sheek being here for a 5th year is low they may want to play a 5th year elsewhere.

There's no benefit to wasting a year of eligibility in a lost season.  None. 

It seems extremely dumb to me, especially in this brave new world of college basketball, to recruit and pay guys who don't have the physicality or skills to help you right away.  When has Marquette *ever* had three non-injured players redshirting during the same season?  I mean, teams are signing NBA draft picks mid-season while we have three 18 year olds contributing nothing to the current roster other than "pouring into each other" and "getting lost in the fight" in practice, where it has been said the players are way ahead of where they are in games because they "fly around" or something.  What genius thought redshirting three guys in a single year would be a good idea?

mug644

Quote from: Biggie Clausen on Today at 04:58:01 PMIt seems extremely dumb to me, especially in this brave new world of college basketball, to recruit and pay guys who don't have the physicality or skills to help you right away.  When has Marquette *ever* had three non-injured players redshirting during the same season?  I mean, teams are signing NBA draft picks mid-season while we have three 18 year olds contributing nothing to the current roster other than "pouring into each other" and "getting lost in the fight" in practice, where it has been said the players are way ahead of where they are in games because they "fly around" or something.  What genius thought redshirting three guys in a single year would be a good idea?

It's worth noting that roster limits increased from 13 to 15 for this season. That might help explain why a program might choose to have 3 redshirt players on their roster.

Pakuni

#32
Quote from: Elonsmusk on Today at 09:44:23 AMLook, Shaka got burned by pretty much this whole returning team underperforming reasonable expectations of growth.  Zaide didn't take the next step despite seemingly getting it done in practice/but not able to translate to gamedays.  Sean largely has been a difference maker in the wrong direction. Ben Gold's shooting has regressed.  Royce started the year very slowly. Damarious hasn't taken much of a step forward.  Chase started the year looking like he'd made improvement but he's fizzled as Royce and Nigel have started to really improve.

The in game coaching has not been great, yet I also feel the crappy performance of pretty much every player (poor shooting, careless turnovers, missed layups), put Shaka into the spin cycle of wholesale substitutions, grasping for straws.

Stop trying to make Shaka a victim. He's not the victim. He's the perp.

The players who can't make layups, who turn over the ball and play matador defense? Those are players he chose to bring into the program.
They haven't developed? It's the job of Shaka and his staff to develop them. The players' failure to develop is also a failure of coaching.

And justifying the haphazard rotations as grasping at straws makes me wonder what Shaka's been doing the past six months. Why are we now in the third month of the season and he still hasn't figured out what his players are capable of?

SOSW

Quote from: mug644 on Today at 06:25:18 PMIt's worth noting that roster limits increased from 13 to 15 for this season. That might help explain why a program might choose to have 3 redshirt players on their roster.

15 players allow for you to take flyers on projects. Nothing wrong with that. But when you over estimate those flyers ability to compete, that's a problem.

WhiteTrash

Quote from: SOSW on Today at 06:46:38 PM15 players allow for you to take flyers on projects. Nothing wrong with that. But when you over estimate those flyers ability to compete, that's a problem.
Or recruiting 13 flyers, not 2 or 3?

Pakuni

Quote from: SOSW on Today at 06:46:38 PM15 players allow for you to take flyers on projects. Nothing wrong with that. But when you over estimate those flyers ability to compete, that's a problem.

15 scholarship players, 5 of whom will never/rarely see the floor, is a wasteful thinning of NIL resources.

SOSW

Quote from: Pakuni on Today at 06:54:49 PM15 scholarship players, 5 of whom will never/rarely see the floor, is a wasteful thinning of NIL resources.

Taking projects means taking players who aren't going to demand much NIL. But I get your point.

Previous topic - Next topic