Creighton

[MUfan12]

That would be voted upon by the scoop media, not present inductees.

Veterans committee, homie. Congrats.

[Tyler COLEk]

Veterans committee, homie. Congrats.

Please, I've barely been retired two seasons.

[TAMU, Knower of Ball]

Except I was discussing the difference between the overall 4 seed and the overall 5 seed not all 1 seeds. If you frame the question as covering all 1 seeds and all 2 seeds as if they are all equal that is something different.

If you aren't interested in discussing how much of an advantage that one spot on the seed list provides, that's fine. But, I would bet that if you tracked the results of the number 1 overall seed versus against the results of the number 4 overall seed, the overall 1 would do significantly better.

You have already dismissed my attempt to quantify my opinion that the probability of a good team beating a 4 seed is not any different than the same team beating a 3 seed. The specific matchup is a much bigger factor than the number of the seed.

Because it doesnt matter if we're talking the 4th 1seed or the top 1 seed. Both of them get the same advantage over a 2 seed. At the start of the tournament a 1 seed always has the easier path over a 2 seed.