collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: [Cracked Sidewalks] Predicting the Top-16 Reveal  (Read 1950 times)

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26508
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
[Cracked Sidewalks] Predicting the Top-16 Reveal
« on: February 18, 2022, 06:54:50 AM »
The NCAA will reveal their official Top-16 seeds tomorrow. Today, Cracked Sidewalks looks back at the history of the Reveal to see how it lines up with the official NCAA metrics, both RPI and NET, and predicts what we'll see tomorrow. But unlike the Committee, we go all the way to 68 and beyond with a new S-Curve too.

https://www.crackedsidewalks.com/2022/02/predicting-top-16-reveal.html?m=1
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

Pepe Sylvia

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Predicting the Top-16 Reveal
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2022, 01:15:37 PM »
neato
twitterx: @HBOCEOofTits

TallTitan34

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9338
  • Gold N. Eagle (Ret.), Two Time SI Cover Model
    • Marquette Overload
Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Predicting the Top-16 Reveal
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2022, 01:19:16 PM »
0-6 Q1 Iowa sucks.  Give me Rutgers instead.

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26508
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Predicting the Top-16 Reveal
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2022, 02:09:35 PM »
0-6 Q1 Iowa sucks.  Give me Rutgers instead.

They are tough to evaluate. The Q1 record sucks, but leaving a top-25 high major team in the NET is really hard to do.
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

cheebs09

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4598
Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Predicting the Top-16 Reveal
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2022, 02:23:48 PM »
They are tough to evaluate. The Q1 record sucks, but leaving a top-25 high major team in the NET is really hard to do.

They will be a nice litmus test for MU. I think MU’s Q1 wins could get them higher than their NET would indicate. However, if Iowa is fairly high, that might indicate it’s not weighted as much as NET by the committee.

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26508
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Predicting the Top-16 Reveal
« Reply #5 on: February 19, 2022, 08:01:58 AM »
The Reveal will be today at 11:30 on CBS.
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

We R Final Four

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6618
Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Predicting the Top-16 Reveal
« Reply #6 on: February 19, 2022, 08:35:55 AM »
Brew—-If we had a 6-8 point lead against GT throughout the game and in the final 3 minutes extended the lead to win by 13……..would our NET have dropped? Im trying to understand the reasoning. Would we have been better served not to have a big lead at all? It seems we are being punished for getting out to such a big lead (only to lose it). I get the Butler loss, but GT is difficult to understand.

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26508
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Predicting the Top-16 Reveal
« Reply #7 on: February 19, 2022, 09:09:25 AM »
Brew—-If we had a 6-8 point lead against GT throughout the game and in the final 3 minutes extended the lead to win by 13……..would our NET have dropped? Im trying to understand the reasoning. Would we have been better served not to have a big lead at all? It seems we are being punished for getting out to such a big lead (only to lose it). I get the Butler loss, but GT is difficult to understand.

No. Final efficiency margin is all it measures. I've heard a proposal that game control should be the primary foundation of the NCAA metric, but as it stands, NET is what we have.

The reason I'm disappointed here is because of what holding the lead like we did in DC would've done. We were on track to improve with the 26-point lead, by a roughly equivalent margin to what we ultimately lost.
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

PGsHeroes32

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 13813
Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Predicting the Top-16 Reveal
« Reply #8 on: February 19, 2022, 09:16:39 AM »
No. Final efficiency margin is all it measures. I've heard a proposal that game control should be the primary foundation of the NCAA metric, but as it stands, NET is what we have.

The reason I'm disappointed here is because of what holding the lead like we did in DC would've done. We were on track to improve with the 26-point lead, by a roughly equivalent margin to what we ultimately lost.

Yeah it was rough.

Hopefully we find a way to win out the last 4 to make up for it. I'd imagine if we were to win all 4 at least one of those games would have us massively exceeding efficiency margins.

But it does stink. Shaka has done great this year at managing late game blowouts(whether up or down) to help efficiency. This one got away. We were on track to win that game by 30+.
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

Uncle Rico

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10109
    • Mazos Hamburgers
Ramsey head thoroughly up his ass.

We R Final Four

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6618
Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Predicting the Top-16 Reveal
« Reply #10 on: February 19, 2022, 09:30:50 AM »
No. Final efficiency margin is all it measures. I've heard a proposal that game control should be the primary foundation of the NCAA metric, but as it stands, NET is what we have.

The reason I'm disappointed here is because of what holding the lead like we did in DC would've done. We were on track to improve with the 26-point lead, by a roughly equivalent margin to what we ultimately lost.
Gotcha—its the final score relative to pre game prediction.
However, this team has been both up huge and down huge throughout the season.
In a lot of those games teams make a run….including our own. Because we were up 26 points early in the second half doesn’t necessarily mean a 30 point win……..regardless of personnel.

SaveOD238

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1504
Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Predicting the Top-16 Reveal
« Reply #11 on: February 19, 2022, 06:59:11 PM »
While we didn't appear in the top 16 reveal, the reveal did show that Marquette will be a tough team to seed this year.  If we end up on the 5 or 6 line the committee might have trouble placing us by virtue of us having played five of the eight 3 and 4 seeds.  Only Texas, Texas Tech, and Tennessee are available as round of 32 matchups.

Prediction: we either get the Texas-Marquette Shaka battle or get bumped to a 7.

 

feedback