MU at wiscy

[hojm]

Just an FYI, tickets for the game 12/4 at Madison go on sale to the public at 9am tomorrow 10/6 at the UW athletics website. You can buy up to 12 seats. Let's get all of the unused tickets for the game!

[MUDPT]

Still plenty available this morning. FYI, they are listing the game starting at 11:30.

Game is on FOX.

[Juan Anderson's Mixtape]

Wait until game day. I bet you'll be able to tickets under $10 on StubHub.

[Viper]

Just an FYI, tickets for the game 12/4 at Madison go on sale to the public at 9am tomorrow 10/6 at the UW athletics website. You can buy up to 12 seats. Let's get all of the unused tickets for the game!

[We R Final Four]

Picked up 5 tix this am.

[Mr. Nielsen]

Here is the link.

https://uwbadgers.evenue.net/cgi-bin/ncommerce3/SEGetEventInfo?ticketCode=GS%3AWISC%3AB21%3AB05%3A&linkID=wisc&shopperContext=&pc=&caller=&appCode=&groupCode=BSINGLE&cgc=&dataAccId=987&locale=en_US&siteId=ev_wisc

[Billy Hoyle]

Wait until game day. I bet you'll be able to tickets under $10 on StubHub.

definitely, especially in the student section. I saw Big Ten games in 2019-20 where the top two levels were completely empty.

[mubb3434]

We usually pickup really good lowers 2-3 weeks before the game on a 3rd party side for a very reasonable price.

[We R Final Four]

Only a handful of single seats remain for Dec 4th in Madison.

[WarriorPride68]

i forgot how lonely this place gets during the summer / football season

[Herman Cain]

i forgot how lonely this place gets during the summer / football season

Have to spend your time in The Superbar ,and NM ,during the dead time of the offseason. 

[Dr. Blackheart]

Marquette are 6 point underdogs. Expected to lose 68-62 at 73% probability.

https://www.barttorvik.com/team.php?team=Wisconsin&year=2022

[panda]

Marquette are 6 point underdogs. Expected to lose 68-62 at 73% probability.

https://www.barttorvik.com/team.php?team=Wisconsin&year=2022

I wouldn’t put a ton of stock into the pre season predictions from BT. It’s a great resource but much more accurate as the season progresses.

[Dr. Blackheart]

I wouldn’t put a ton of stock into the pre season predictions from BT. It’s a great resource but much more accurate as the season progresses.

Okay. Let's not talk basketball then.

[panda]

Okay. Let's not talk basketball then.

I’ve been talking plenty of hoops recently.

You just copy and pasted a stat from a website which isn’t reliable at this time of year.

BT is fantastic as the season progresses, but is a complete crapshoot pre season. Taking a quick glance at UW’s PRPG! (which is how the game predictions take shape) and they’re very strange. Chris Vogt as a .4 with 18% of the mins played is inaccurate.  Chucky Hepburn coming in as a 3 star and garnering almost a 2.0 is a gross miscalculation and I’d be willing to bet Johnny Davis will be much higher than a low 2 something by seasons end.

Looking over the roster, Wisconsin is extremely lucky Davison returned. He should help them stay out of the b10’s basement. Their roster is ugly.

[Stretchdeltsig]

Marquette are 6 point underdogs. Expected to lose 68-62 at 73% probability.

https://www.barttorvik.com/team.php?team=Wisconsin&year=2022

Haha. You're joking right. Our talent is far superior and now so is our coaching. Warriors by 10.

[Dr. Blackheart]

I’ve been talking plenty of hoops recently.

You just copy and pasted a stat from a website which isn’t reliable at this time of year.

BT is fantastic as the season progresses, but is a complete crapshoot pre season. Taking a quick glance at UW’s PRPG! (which is how the game predictions take shape) and they’re very strange. Chris Vogt as a .4 with 18% of the mins played is inaccurate.  Chucky Hepburn coming in as a 3 star and garnering almost a 2.0 is a gross miscalculation and I’d be willing to bet Johnny Davis will be much higher than a low 2 something by seasons end.

Looking over the roster, Wisconsin is extremely lucky Davison returned. He should help them stay out of the b10’s basement. Their roster is ugly.

BT or KPom preseason are good starting points for discussion versus your or my eye tests, especially if the criteria is "crap".

I see you don't mention Davis who is the most talented player on either team. Davidson is by the far most experienced floor leader on either team as you point out. Carlson is a good fit for The Swing in that role.

On Marquette's side, our best player has practiced one day. We also hear rumors of great improvement from Lewis (from his very inefficient first year and his 22% trey shooting). Kur fits Shaka's D need and can dunk. MU might be starting a freshman at PG or mid-major transfer. Greg is in and out of the blue tent but could offer an advantage as 6th man

BT calls both teams middling to start the year. Sounds right to me.  Playing at home and considering the significant questions marks on both teams, I can see why Wisconsin is favored. Many here seem to have some blue and gold colored glasses on with MU's immediate future.

I do agree MU will be much better defensively than BT calls, and worse offensively. But, it will be a sea saw middling year.

[panda]

BT or KPom preseason are good starting points for discussion versus your or my eye tests, especially if the criteria is "crap".

I see you don't mention Davis who is the most talented player on either team. Davidson is by the far most experienced floor leader on either team as you point out. Carlson is a good fit for The Swing in that role.

On Marquette's side, our best player has practiced one day. We also hear rumors of great improvement from Lewis (from his very inefficient first year and his 22% trey shooting). Kur fits Shaka's D need and can dunk. MU might be starting a freshman at PG or mid-major transfer. Greg is in and out of the blue tent but could offer an advantage as 6th man

BT calls both teams middling to start the year. Sounds right to me.  Playing at home and considering the significant questions marks on both teams, I can see why Wisconsin is favored. Many here seem to have some blue and gold colored glasses on with MU's immediate future.

I do agree MU will be much better defensively than BT calls, and worse offensively. But, it will be a sea saw middling year.

My point is that BT is a results based analytics model. The predictive portion of the algorithm is not remotely accurate without any results to base it off of. Especially with two teams with a lot of new pieces.