collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by MU82
[Today at 11:04:51 AM]


NIL Money by MU82
[Today at 10:14:21 AM]


Marquette/Indiana Finalizing Agreement by PointWarrior
[Today at 09:52:07 AM]


Kam update by MUbiz
[Today at 09:44:14 AM]


Pearson to MU by mileskishnish72
[Today at 06:41:47 AM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by brewcity77
[May 12, 2025, 08:53:49 PM]


Proposed rule changes( coaching challenges) by romey
[May 12, 2025, 04:27:00 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!



MUBurrow

I have a stupid question.  Rather than trying to come up with an amount to throw at this, is it administratively feasible to say something along the lines of:  "the federal government will reimburse all qualifying businesses biweekly for 80% of all payroll expenses for employees making less than $100k and 80% of all rent for all qualifying businesses (<500 employees, etc.) until further notice, and promises to provide at least 2 weeks' notice before stopping reimbursements" ?

Then if businesses don't follow what the rules basically are now in terms of retaining employment levels, etc., they get hit with a tax + unique coronavirus program penalties on their 2020 returns for a proportion of what they received from the feds during the crisis. 

It just seems we're trying to just funnel as much money as we can into small businesses to keep people on payroll, but (i) trying to lob sidways numbers at it through congress on the front end plus (ii) setting this up as loans at little to no profit through conventional lenders in association with an understaffed SBA, is really mucking this whole thing up. 

jesmu84


Previous topic - Next topic