collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Pope Leo XIV by mug644
[Today at 04:05:44 PM]


OT MU adds swimming program by Uncle Rico
[Today at 01:59:06 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by Galway Eagle
[Today at 01:47:03 PM]


NIL Money by MU82
[Today at 08:54:49 AM]


Recruiting as of 4/15/25 by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[May 07, 2025, 10:37:23 PM]


Ethan Johnston to Marquette by Shooter McGavin
[May 07, 2025, 10:30:31 PM]


APR Updates by Jay Bee
[May 07, 2025, 10:26:24 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

Cheeks

"I hate everything about this job except the games, Everything. I don't even get affected anymore by the winning, by the ratings, those things. The trouble is, it will sound like an excuse because we've never won the national championship, but winning just isn't all that important to me." Al McGuire

wadesworld

Too early to be as valuable as they are later in the season.

Cheeks

Quote from: wadesworld on December 16, 2019, 08:36:30 AM
Too early to be as valuable as they are later in the season.

The question was whether it would be you, Lenny or someone else.  I had my money on you.

From the article I linked from the NCAA... "A larger sample size generally leads to more accurate analysis, so the extra two-plus weeks of data will presumably lead to less-apparent variance in the first edition of the NET rankings."


So yes, less valuable today then they will be in a few weeks.
"I hate everything about this job except the games, Everything. I don't even get affected anymore by the winning, by the ratings, those things. The trouble is, it will sound like an excuse because we've never won the national championship, but winning just isn't all that important to me." Al McGuire

wadesworld

Quote from: Cheeks on December 16, 2019, 08:40:11 AM
The question was whether it would be you, Lenny or someone else.  I had my money on you.

From the article I linked from the NCAA... "A larger sample size generally leads to more accurate analysis, so the extra two-plus weeks of data will presumably lead to less-apparent variance in the first edition of the NET rankings."


So yes, less valuable today then they will be in a few weeks.

You nailed it.  I'll get you some free Wifi, Six Flags tickets for you, the wife, and kids, and Miller High Life the next time you're in Milwaukee.

brewcity77

Marquette checks in at 53. Two behind 5-5 Wisconsin.


Pakuni

Duquesne, whose best win is over KenPom #118 Indiana State, checks in at #20. Next best win over #144 Radford.
NET is very dumb.

MU82

When Duquesne is in the Final Four, we'll laugh as we look back and fondly recall how valuable this NET ranking was.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Pakuni

Stanford, whose best win is over KenPom #50 Oklahoma, ranked 9th.
Again, the NET is very dumb.

UWW2MU

The NET was pretty wild with the rankings in December last year as well.  I thought it worked out fairly decent by the end, other than seemingly (to my eyes) favoring slower tempo teams.

Dr. Blackheart

Quote from: Pakuni on December 16, 2019, 10:19:42 AM
Duquesne, whose best win is over KenPom #118 Indiana State, checks in at #20. Next best win over #144 Radford.
NET is very dumb.

I assume Magic Dawson has returned to #19 Liberty.

UWW2MU

So we're 53 in NET.  That makes us a Q2a home game for our opponents.   Yet, WI team sheet has us listed as a Q3 win.   

Or am I missing something here?

Tha Hound


LloydsLegs

Big east with 9 teams in top 71.

Providence at 146.  Oooof. 

cheebs09

I believe Buzz's Texas A&M Team is the lowest major conference team at 281.

MuMark

NET isn't dumb....it's just dumb at the beginning of the year.....by the end of the season it will be a useful tool.....much better then the RPI was.......

shoothoops

#16
NM

Coleman

Wish they would wait until mid-January for the initial NET rankings, rather than mid-December.

Silkk the Shaka

Quote from: cheebs09 on December 16, 2019, 10:44:42 AM
I believe Buzz's Texas A&M Team is the lowest major conference team at 281.

LOL nice

Cheeks

Quote from: Pakuni on December 16, 2019, 10:19:42 AM
Duquesne, whose best win is over KenPom #118 Indiana State, checks in at #20. Next best win over #144 Radford.
NET is very dumb.

It's early and that is why it isn't that valuable at the moment.  It will normalize with more data as more games are played.

In effect it is very dumb (less valuable) this time of year, but beware saying that as it irks some here.
"I hate everything about this job except the games, Everything. I don't even get affected anymore by the winning, by the ratings, those things. The trouble is, it will sound like an excuse because we've never won the national championship, but winning just isn't all that important to me." Al McGuire

SaveOD238

Quote from: brewcity77 on December 16, 2019, 10:15:14 AM
Marquette checks in at 53. Two behind 5-5 Wisconsin.

This I do not understand.  Sure, Bucky beat us head-to-head, but their stats otherwise suck.

Wisconsin: 5-5, Q1 0-3, Q2 2-2, Q3 0-0, Q4 3-0
Marquette: 7-2, Q1 0-2, Q2 3-0, Q3 1-0, Q4 3-0

The only advantage Wisco has is in the average opponent rank.  Theirs is 12th best, but ours is "only" 36th best.

GB Warrior

Net Rankings before conference schedules are in full swing no matta. Intriguing data point and we get to all guffaw over being behind UW and DePaul. But at this point, it is as useful as which way the wind is blowing.

Cheeks

Quote from: cheebs09 on December 16, 2019, 10:44:42 AM
I believe Buzz's Texas A&M Team is the lowest major conference team at 281.

Correct, if we are talking P6 teams.

I believe they are the only P6 school even in the 200's and they are almost at 300.

The next worse school I think is Northwestern at 174.  I may have missed one, however.
"I hate everything about this job except the games, Everything. I don't even get affected anymore by the winning, by the ratings, those things. The trouble is, it will sound like an excuse because we've never won the national championship, but winning just isn't all that important to me." Al McGuire

Jay Bee

Quote from: Cheeks on December 16, 2019, 12:39:21 PM
Correct, if we are talking P6 teams.

I believe they are the only P6 school even in the 200's and they are almost at 300.

The next worse school I think is Northwestern at 174.  I may have missed one, however.

Cal, @ina?
The portal is NOT closed.

Cheeks

Quote from: Jay Bee on December 16, 2019, 12:41:42 PM
Cal, @ina?

Good call Jay Bee, I want out of this state so badly I didn't even see it on the list.  Cal slightly worse than Northwestern at 182.
"I hate everything about this job except the games, Everything. I don't even get affected anymore by the winning, by the ratings, those things. The trouble is, it will sound like an excuse because we've never won the national championship, but winning just isn't all that important to me." Al McGuire

Previous topic - Next topic