collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Where's Sam? by JakeBarnes
[Today at 12:07:59 AM]


Marquette NBA Thread by Jay Bee
[May 14, 2025, 10:02:47 PM]


2026 Bracketology by Johnny B
[May 14, 2025, 09:45:54 PM]


Marquette vs Oklahoma by Jay Bee
[May 14, 2025, 07:48:47 PM]


Kam update by wadesworld
[May 14, 2025, 07:18:42 PM]


Pearson to MU by BCHoopster
[May 14, 2025, 06:07:37 PM]


Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by Hards Alumni
[May 14, 2025, 02:13:17 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

PaintTouches

The Sam Hauser slander (by omission) is killing me this offseason. Time to put some respeck on his name.

https://painttouches.com/2018/05/24/stop-sleeping-on-sam-hauser/

brewcity77

Good article with one notable caveat. There is no slander in any of the Twitter statements or published articles you refer to. Slander refers only to false spoken statements. As these are written statements, it has to be considered libel. I always think of it as "S" is for spoken and slander, "L" is for literature and libel.


PaintTouches

Quote from: brewcity77 on May 24, 2018, 02:47:33 PM
Good article with one notable caveat. There is no slander in any of the Twitter statements or published articles you refer to. Slander refers only to false spoken statements. As these are written statements, it has to be considered libel. I always think of it as "S" is for spoken and slander, "L" is for literature and libel.

There's no slander or libel, I'm just a sucker for alliteration. Forgive me. 

MUCam

Quote from: pux90mex on May 25, 2018, 09:39:37 AM
There's no slander or libel, I'm just a sucker for alliteration. Forgive me.

I think you just defamed yourself.

Dawson Rental

You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

Class71

Back to the issue. Should Sam be on the 1st team?  I love seeing Marcus on the list but Sam does more than shoot the ball well from distance. Passing, defense, low turnover rate and rebounding needs to be factored in. Sam is not flashy but maybe that is why he is so good. He is a team player.
⛵⛵⛵⛵⛵

Jay Bee

Quote from: Class71 on May 27, 2018, 08:45:46 PM
Back to the issue. Should Sam be on the 1st team?  I love seeing Marcus on the list but Sam does more than shoot the ball well from distance. Passing, defense, low turnover rate and rebounding needs to be factored in. Sam is not flashy but maybe that is why he is so good. He is a team player.

A look at usage and %Shots...

Markus 28.8% / 32.7%
Ponds 32.0% / 32.6%
Spellman 17.8% / 19.8% (as a freshman with great teammates)
Govan 24.8% / 28.3%
Powell 21.9% / 24.2%

Sam... 18.1% / 20.8%

The question is where do you project Sam for 2018-19... I'd like to see 22% / 24%... will he get there? If so, he's probably in. If not, there's a reasonable "low-usage" argument for him being out.
The portal is NOT closed.

Jockey

I laughed when I read the article last week.

I think this guy may have a Hauser complex. He didn't mention Joey with the Newcomers, either.

brewcity77

Quote from: Jay Bee on May 28, 2018, 09:16:37 AM
A look at usage and %Shots...

Markus 28.8% / 32.7%
Ponds 32.0% / 32.6%
Spellman 17.8% / 19.8% (as a freshman with great teammates)
Govan 24.8% / 28.3%
Powell 21.9% / 24.2%

Sam... 18.1% / 20.8%

The question is where do you project Sam for 2018-19... I'd like to see 22% / 24%... will he get there? If so, he's probably in. If not, there's a reasonable "low-usage" argument for him being out.

One of the questions will be where he can maintain his efficiency. Last year he increased both his usage and efficiency. That will be tough to do again. I think 22/24 would make him likely first team, even with a slight dip in efficiency. 24/26 would probably get him into the BEPOY/National All-American conversation. If he can push those numbers into the 28-30 range, he's a national POY candidate. Though making the jump from where he was at to that type of usage is probably more realistic for his senior year.

MomofMUltiples

Quote from: Jockey on May 28, 2018, 10:38:36 AM
I laughed when I read the article last week.

I think this guy may have a Hauser complex. He didn't mention Joey with the Newcomers, either.

It seems that Joey got lost between last year and this year.  When he matriculated in January, he was reclassified to 2017, so he is no longer included in the 2018 lists of top players (all the guys who moved up a notch as a result say thank-you).  Technically he will begin this season as a redshirt freshman, not a newcomer.  Same with Brendan, who was counted as part of Marquette's 2016 class (although he will be a regular freshman).  With these "forgotten boys" + Morrow and Chartouny, I don't think the rest of the Big East will know what hit them.
I mean, OK, maybe he's secretly a serial killer who's pulled the wool over our eyes with his good deeds and smooth jumper - Pakuni (on Markus Howard)

Previous topic - Next topic