collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

2025 Coaching Carousel by MU82
[Today at 04:10:24 PM]


Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by MuMark
[Today at 03:54:46 PM]


NCAA settlement approved - schools now can (and will) directly pay athletes by The Sultan
[Today at 03:39:16 PM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by MuMark
[Today at 03:33:28 PM]


NM by MU82
[June 08, 2025, 05:27:37 PM]


New Uniform Numbers by cheebs09
[June 08, 2025, 12:28:55 PM]


NCAA Tournament expansion as early as next season. by Mutaman
[June 07, 2025, 10:06:33 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75


WarriorDad

Is this guy saying Ken Pom doesn't matter and only RPI does when it comes to the data rankings?
"No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth."
— Plato

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: WarriorDad on March 04, 2018, 12:26:59 AM
Is this guy saying Ken Pom doesn't matter and only RPI does when it comes to the data rankings?

A team's KenPom is considered along with the other metrics. But the only metric the committee uses when grouping a team's wins and losses is RPI.

For example, Marquette's Q1 record using RPI is 4-7. Using KenPom it's 6-9. The committee don't care about that second one.

On a whim, I decided to calculate our quadrants using the much more accurate KenPom:

Q1: 6-9
Q2: 3-3
Q3: 3-0
Q4: 5-0

Dang, I wish they used KenPom for the quadrants
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


GB Warrior

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on March 04, 2018, 12:58:49 AM
A team's KenPom is considered along with the other metrics. But the only metric the committee uses when grouping a team's wins and losses is RPI.

For example, Marquette's Q1 record using RPI is 4-7. Using KenPom it's 6-9. The committee don't care about that second one.

On a whim, I decided to calculate our quadrants using the much more accurate KenPom:

Q1: 6-9
Q2: 3-3
Q3: 3-0
Q4: 5-0

Dang, I wish they used KenPom for the quadrants

Are there any losses that fall out of Q2 with  RPI?

brewcity77

Quote from: GB Warrior on March 04, 2018, 07:03:39 AM
Are there any losses that fall out of Q2 with  RPI?

DePaul and Georgia are both currently Q3 losses.

MU82

Thanks for providing that, auburn. Very useful to know what they're looking at.

This sentence caught my eye in Palm's explanation:

games in November mean just as much as games in March
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Spaniel with a Short Tail

When determining quadrant record, do they use gameday RPI or end of season RPI?

brewcity77

Quote from: MU82 on March 04, 2018, 09:43:18 AM
Thanks for providing that, auburn. Very useful to know what they're looking at.

This sentence caught my eye in Palm's explanation:

games in November mean just as much as games in March

This is why the DePaul loss, while bad, isn't as bad as people think. In terms of recency bias, we think "crap that's a huge loss right as the committee is deciding bids!" In reality, it's no more detrimental now than if we swapped it with a loss 1 or 3 months earlier. The key for us is the quality at the top of our resume.

The biggest teams for us to cheer for this week will be Creighton and Georgia (aside from against bid thieves). Those teams with a win or two could move up from a Q2 to Q1 win and a Q3 to Q2 loss. That would really polish the resume a bit.

WhiteTrash

I also noticed injuries are NOT considered. ND fans take notice.

JamilJaeJamailJrJuan

Quote from: Goose on February 09, 2017, 11:06:04 AM
I would take the Rick SLU program right now.

brewcity77

Quote from: WhiteTrash on March 04, 2018, 10:07:33 AM
I also noticed injuries are NOT considered. ND fans take notice.

ND will be very interesting. The computer numbers are pretty good (even RPI isn't terrible) but the lack of Q1 wins along with 3 Q3 losses seems like a killer. Hard to justify their inclusion but I've seen stranger things.

MU82

Hard to imagine that all human element is eliminated. Hard to imagine that there will not be at least some committee members talking about how a team finished, injuries, superstars on roster, etc. Selection committee members ARE only human. No?
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

WhiteTrash

Quote from: brewcity77 on March 04, 2018, 10:11:12 AM
ND will be very interesting. The computer numbers are pretty good (even RPI isn't terrible) but the lack of Q1 wins along with 3 Q3 losses seems like a killer. Hard to justify their inclusion but I've seen stranger things.

I don't care if ND is in or out, but by the numbers and stated criteria it really should not be that interesting. They should be out. I guess what will be interesting will be watching Bilas, Williams, Greenberg and the rest of ESPN pleading the case for ND. But everyone knows that your not going to get unbiased reporting from ESPN any more when it comes to the ACC.

Juan Anderson's Mixtape

I want the Seton Hall vs  Creighton winner to win the BET.  That would make our sweep much more impressive.

muguru

Quote from: Lazar's Punk'd Headband on March 04, 2018, 11:02:20 AM
]I want the Seton Hall vs  Creighton winner Marquette to win the BET.  That would make our sweep much more impressive.

FTFY
"Being realistic is the most common path to mediocrity." Will Smith

We live in a society that rewards mediocrity , I detest mediocrity - David Goggi

I want this quote to serve as a reminder to the vast majority of scoop posters in regards to the MU BB program.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: MU82 on March 04, 2018, 10:43:05 AM
Hard to imagine that all human element is eliminated. Hard to imagine that there will not be at least some committee members talking about how a team finished, injuries, superstars on roster, etc. Selection committee members ARE only human. No?

You're absolutely correct 82. When we hire people at TAMU we use a rubric to score them. But there's no escaping that there are elements that aren't on the rubric that end up subconsciously (or consciously in some cases) end up affecting our score.

For example, Creighton's AD is on the committee and he might find our sweep of Creighton more impressive than others  ;D
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


fjm

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on March 04, 2018, 12:15:52 PM
You're absolutely correct 82. When we hire people at TAMU we use a rubric to score them. But there's no escaping that there are elements that aren't on the rubric that end up subconsciously (or consciously in some cases) end up affecting our score.

For example, Creighton's AD is on the committee and he might find our sweep of Creighton more impressive than others  ;D

That or he'll hate us and keep
Us out because obviously when both creighton and MU make it to the sweet 16 this year, he won't want us to play them and win.  :o

WarriorDad

Quote from: MU82 on March 04, 2018, 09:43:18 AM
Thanks for providing that, auburn. Very useful to know what they're looking at.

This sentence caught my eye in Palm's explanation:

games in November mean just as much as games in March

Caught my eye as well.  Someone said yesterday here that games in November don't count, but apparently that couldn't be more wrong.
"No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth."
— Plato

SaveOD238

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on March 04, 2018, 12:15:52 PM
You're absolutely correct 82. When we hire people at TAMU we use a rubric to score them. But there's no escaping that there are elements that aren't on the rubric that end up subconsciously (or consciously in some cases) end up affecting our score.

For example, Creighton's AD is on the committee and he might find our sweep of Creighton more impressive than others  ;D

Don't Creighton and MU have a pretty good administrative relationship too?  Maybe the Creighton AD can pay us back for getting them into the Big East

Previous topic - Next topic