collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 3/15/24 by wadesworld
[Today at 04:39:02 PM]


Maximilian Langenfeld by brewcity77
[Today at 04:32:19 PM]


Big East 2024 Offseason by mugrad_89
[Today at 04:13:05 PM]


2024 Transfer Portal by Spotcheck Billy
[Today at 04:10:59 PM]


NIL Future by Uncle Rico
[Today at 03:56:29 PM]


Shaka's 2023-2024 Season Accomplishments by LloydsLegs
[Today at 02:48:52 PM]


MU Gear by MUfan12
[Today at 01:31:51 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?  (Read 55584 times)

Billy Hoyle

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2667
  • Retire #34
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #100 on: June 16, 2017, 02:59:44 PM »
Jumpin' Jesuits, while a good name, would never pass muster in todays PC. It would offend the atheists and other religions. Could not be tolerated. Makes one wonder how Providence gets away with Friars.
Now how about the MU Three Point Holy Trinities?

The thing with most of you anti-PC folks is that you just assume something it going to offend other groups and then blame everything on "PC." I guarantee you no atheist or member of another religion has complained about "Friars." As one myself I'd never even thought of being "offended."
« Last Edit: June 16, 2017, 05:09:27 PM by Billy Hoyle »
“You either smoke or you get smoked. And you got smoked.”

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #101 on: June 16, 2017, 03:01:16 PM »
The thing with most of you anti-PC folks is that you just assume something it going to offend other groups and then blame everything on "PC." I guarantee you no atheist or member of another religion has complained about "Friars." As on myself I'd never even thought of being "offended."


Those who complain the most about "PC" are often the biggest snowflakes among us.

oldwarrior81

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1004
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #102 on: June 16, 2017, 04:30:44 PM »
I have a friend named Bill that was extremely offended after Buffalo lost 4 straight Super Bowls.
Even threatened to loot Grand Avenue.

TSmith34, Inc.

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5143
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #103 on: June 16, 2017, 09:11:13 PM »
The thing with most of you anti-PC folks is that you just assume something it going to offend other groups and then blame everything on "PC." I guarantee you no atheist or member of another religion has complained about "Friars." As one myself I'd never even thought of being "offended."
Don't ruin willie's narrative.  It makes him feel better about himself when he can blame imagined sleights on horrible, horrible "PCs".
If you think for one second that I am comparing the USA to China you have bumped your hard.

willie warrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9576
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #104 on: June 17, 2017, 11:45:33 AM »

Those who complain the most about "PC" are often the biggest snowflakes among us.
Yeah, thats right Sultan. I learned all about snowflakes from my 3 years in the USMC.
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22132
  • Meat Eater certified
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #105 on: June 17, 2017, 11:52:37 AM »
Yeah, thats right Sultan. I learned all about snowflakes from my 3 years in the USMC.

Being a snowflake in this context has nothing to do with physical toughness. Its about the inability to deal with opinions and ideas that you don't agree with.
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26439
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #106 on: June 17, 2017, 03:33:31 PM »
What's amusing is contemporary use of "snowflake" originated with Fight Club, written by Chuck Pahlaniuk. It was spoken by the narrator's alter ego, Tyler Durden, talking about how the fight club members were not unique or special.

So basically, the term was coined by a gay writer's paranoid delusion terrorist that blew up buildings to mask his sexual inadequacies.

Sounds like the fragile description of most everyone that tries to use the term  ;D
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

buckchuckler

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 922
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #107 on: June 17, 2017, 06:37:57 PM »
Well this is a crap show.

WellsstreetWanderer

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2108
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #108 on: June 17, 2017, 06:46:23 PM »
What's amusing is contemporary use of "snowflake" originated with Fight Club, written by Chuck Pahlaniuk. It was spoken by the narrator's alter ego, Tyler Durden, talking about how the fight club members were not unique or special.

So basically, the term was coined by a gay writer's paranoid delusion terrorist that blew up buildings to mask his sexual inadequacies.

Sounds like the fragile description of most everyone that tries to use the term  ;D
No its a term thst adequately describes people who demand to ne able to escape to safe places when exposed to ideas they can't  shout down.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22132
  • Meat Eater certified
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #109 on: June 17, 2017, 10:01:40 PM »
No its a term thst adequately describes people who demand to ne able to escape to safe places when exposed to ideas they can't  shout down.

Exactly.  The most common of which is people who complain about being PC.  They want to go to a safe space where they do have to think about being pc
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26439
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #110 on: June 18, 2017, 02:07:50 AM »
No its a term thst adequately describes people who demand to ne able to escape to safe places when exposed to ideas they can't  shout down.

No, it's a term used by Neo-Nazis that was popularized by a gay writer's fictional delusion.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.ibtimes.com/what-snowflake-origin-insult-alt-right-leaders-who-support-trump-2492485%3Famp%3D1

The level of irony that drips off the term is thicker than crude oil.
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

willie warrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9576
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #111 on: June 18, 2017, 12:11:30 PM »
Being a snowflake in this context has nothing to do with physical toughness. Its about the inability to deal with opinions and ideas that you don't agree with.
Like I said, learned all of that in the military. And your definition certainly describes the many intolerant "snowflakes" out there, especially the PC warriors.
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22132
  • Meat Eater certified
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #112 on: June 18, 2017, 01:41:31 PM »
Like I said, learned all of that in the military. And your definition certainly describes the many intolerant "snowflakes" out there, especially the PC warriors.

How is challenging something you find offensive being a snowflake? I feel like a snowflake would just melt and say nothing. And the term isn't PC Warrior. Its social justice warrior. As in the most badass nickname in sports history, that fights for social justice, something we all learned to aspire to from the Jesuits at Marquette.
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10012
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #113 on: June 18, 2017, 02:16:07 PM »
Like I said, learned all of that in the military. And your definition certainly describes the many intolerant "snowflakes" out there, especially the PC warriors.

Someone seems triggered.

GooooMarquette

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9489
  • We got this.
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #114 on: June 18, 2017, 02:58:29 PM »
I'm anti-PC.

I use a MacBook.

B. McBannerson

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 274
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #115 on: June 18, 2017, 06:58:30 PM »
No, it's a term used by Neo-Nazis that was popularized by a gay writer's fictional delusion.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.ibtimes.com/what-snowflake-origin-insult-alt-right-leaders-who-support-trump-2492485%3Famp%3D1

The level of irony that drips off the term is thicker than crude oil.

The irony drips heavier knowing Snopes says this claim is not true


http://www.snopes.com/snowflake-nazi-term-holocaust/

Newsdreams

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9574
  • Goal - Win BE
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #116 on: June 18, 2017, 09:22:25 PM »
Like I said, learned all of that in the military. And your definition certainly describes the many intolerant "snowflakes" out there, especially the PC warriors.
So because you "learned it" in the military makes it right. Most of what is learned in the military is BS if you just accept it as fact. All militaries teach follow, don't ask else they don't work. And don't preach me on military, born on an army base, son of an army pilot And Colonel, been ROTC and Ranger camp. The I learend all in military is BS.
Goal is National Championship

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22870
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #117 on: June 18, 2017, 09:42:54 PM »
No, it's a term used by Neo-Nazis that was popularized by a gay writer's fictional delusion.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.ibtimes.com/what-snowflake-origin-insult-alt-right-leaders-who-support-trump-2492485%3Famp%3D1

The level of irony that drips off the term is thicker than crude oil.

I don't know what the true origin is, but I'm quite certain it pre-dated the Orange Menace's presidential run.
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

Tugg Speedman

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8836
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #118 on: June 19, 2017, 09:42:23 AM »
Why do/did people hate Gold? Is it purely because of the way it was rolled out, or the name itself.

Personally, I liked it a lot.  It would put MU in the company of these schools that use colors as their names.  Also, no one uses Gold so we would have been unique.

Dartmouth = Big Green
Cornell - Big Red
Wellesley = Blue
Unversity of Chicago = Maroons
Roanoke = Maroons
Harvard = Crimson
Syracuse = Orange (color, not food)
Stanford = Cardinal (color, not bird)


Conversely, here are all the Golden Eagles.  Nothing desirable about his list.

Cal State Los Angeles (Los Angeles)
Charleston (West Virginia) (Charleston, West Virginia)
Cincinnati Christian (Cincinnati)
Clarion (Pennsylvania) (Clarion, Pennsylvania)
College at Brockport: SUNY (Brockport, New York)
Cornerstone University (Grand Rapids, Michigan)
John Brown University (Siloam Springs, Arkansas)
La Sierra (Riverside, California)
Marquette (Milwaukee)
Minnesota, Crookston (Crookston, Minnesota)
Oral Roberts (Tulsa, Oklahoma)
Rock Valley College (Rockford, Illinois)
Southern Miss (Hattiesburg, Mississippi)
Tennessee Tech (Cookeville, Tennessee)

« Last Edit: June 19, 2017, 09:43:54 AM by 1.21 Jigawatts »

Bocephys

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2016
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #119 on: June 19, 2017, 10:03:12 AM »
Why do/did people hate Gold? Is it purely because of the way it was rolled out, or the name itself.

Personally, I liked it a lot.  It would put MU in the company of these schools that use colors as their names.  Also, no one uses Gold so we would have been unique.

Dartmouth = Big Green
Cornell - Big Red
Wellesley = Blue
Unversity of Chicago = Maroons
Roanoke = Maroons
Harvard = Crimson
Syracuse = Orange (color, not food)
Stanford = Cardinal (color, not bird)


Conversely, here are all the Golden Eagles.  Nothing desirable about his list.

Cal State Los Angeles (Los Angeles)
Charleston (West Virginia) (Charleston, West Virginia)
Cincinnati Christian (Cincinnati)
Clarion (Pennsylvania) (Clarion, Pennsylvania)
College at Brockport: SUNY (Brockport, New York)
Cornerstone University (Grand Rapids, Michigan)
John Brown University (Siloam Springs, Arkansas)
La Sierra (Riverside, California)
Marquette (Milwaukee)
Minnesota, Crookston (Crookston, Minnesota)
Oral Roberts (Tulsa, Oklahoma)
Rock Valley College (Rockford, Illinois)
Southern Miss (Hattiesburg, Mississippi)
Tennessee Tech (Cookeville, Tennessee)

Pretty sure you're confusing Dartmouth with the catcher from The Sandlot 


Lennys Tap

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12272
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #120 on: June 19, 2017, 10:12:36 AM »
How is challenging something you find offensive being a snowflake? I feel like a snowflake would just melt and say nothing. And the term isn't PC Warrior. Its social justice warrior. As in the most badass nickname in sports history, that fights for social justice, something we all learned to aspire to from the Jesuits at Marquette.

Challenging something you find offensive in open, inclusive discussion and debate is not being a snowflake. Retreating to safe spaces where political orthodoxy and a predetermined one sided definition of social justice is the only one tolerated is. That's not "badass" at all and nothing I learned to aspire to at Marquette.




TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22132
  • Meat Eater certified
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #121 on: June 19, 2017, 10:13:14 AM »
Honestly didn't hate Gold. But whatever name they picked was doomed to be hated.  Maybe Hilltoppers would have been OK. But that's the only non warrior name that I could have seen being embraced by a significant amount of alumni.
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22132
  • Meat Eater certified
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #122 on: June 19, 2017, 10:15:37 AM »
Challenging something you find offensive in open, inclusive discussion and debate is not being a snowflake. Retreating to safe spaces where political orthodoxy and a predetermined one sided definition of social justice is the only one tolerated is. That's not "badass" at all and nothingI learned to aspire to at Marquette.

You'll need to give me examples. I hear this all the time but other than a few isolated incidents I have never seen evidence of the snowflake epidemic that many seem to think  is happening in our country.
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


Bocephys

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2016
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #123 on: June 19, 2017, 10:21:59 AM »
This thread took a turn


Billy Hoyle

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2667
  • Retire #34
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #124 on: June 19, 2017, 11:41:12 AM »
Why do/did people hate Gold? Is it purely because of the way it was rolled out, or the name itself.

Personally, I liked it a lot.  It would put MU in the company of these schools that use colors as their names.  Also, no one uses Gold so we would have been unique.

Dartmouth = Big Green
Cornell - Big Red
Wellesley = Blue
Unversity of Chicago = Maroons
Roanoke = Maroons
Harvard = Crimson
Syracuse = Orange (color, not food)
Stanford = Cardinal (color, not bird)


Conversely, here are all the Golden Eagles.  Nothing desirable about his list.

Cal State Los Angeles (Los Angeles)
Charleston (West Virginia) (Charleston, West Virginia)
Cincinnati Christian (Cincinnati)
Clarion (Pennsylvania) (Clarion, Pennsylvania)
College at Brockport: SUNY (Brockport, New York)
Cornerstone University (Grand Rapids, Michigan)
John Brown University (Siloam Springs, Arkansas)
La Sierra (Riverside, California)
Marquette (Milwaukee)
Minnesota, Crookston (Crookston, Minnesota)
Oral Roberts (Tulsa, Oklahoma)
Rock Valley College (Rockford, Illinois)
Southern Miss (Hattiesburg, Mississippi)
Tennessee Tech (Cookeville, Tennessee)

So what if other schools have it?  How many are Wildcats or Bulldogs or Tigers?  It doesn't seem to affect Kentucky, Butler or LSU.

The way the Warrior crowd gets wrapped up in a nickname and mascot isn't much different than Wisconsin and their Bucky worship. The chant is "We Are Marquette," not "We are Warriors/Golden Eagles." None of us chose Warrior College or Golden Eagle University, we chose Marquette.

Oh, and an excellent point about "Gold." I think it was the rollout. It came out of nowhere.
“You either smoke or you get smoked. And you got smoked.”