collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

More conference realignment talk by WhiteTrash
[Today at 02:05:42 PM]


Congrats to Royce by Its DJOver
[Today at 12:25:34 PM]


Scouting Report: Ian Miletic by mug644
[May 20, 2025, 06:40:19 PM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by MuggsyB
[May 20, 2025, 06:27:04 PM]


NM by marqfan22
[May 20, 2025, 05:53:46 PM]


Marquette vs Oklahoma by dgies9156
[May 20, 2025, 12:25:50 PM]


What is the actual gap between Marquette and the top of the Big East by MU82
[May 20, 2025, 11:09:52 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


Vander Blue Man Group

Quote from: wadesworld on May 06, 2017, 03:07:39 PM
Says the only guy on the board, Packers fan, Bears fan, or otherwise, who thinks the Bears needed to trade away 4 draft picks to move up 1 spot to draft a guy who started 1 year at a bad football program at a position they paid $14M to a free agent this same offseason for, despite even a guy that worked in the Bears FO and still has a number of inside contacts saying it was a horrible and unnecessary move.

And by the way, I never said it was a great trade or even a good trade.  My initial reaction was shock and disgust but I've since softened on it. 

Yes, I'm clearly in the minority on that subject as well. And that's fine. But I'm not the only person that believes the *possibility* existed.

My issue is when people speak with absolute certainty when I don't think it's possible for them to have absolute certainty, even if it's highly likely they are correct.

Previous topic - Next topic