collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by JTJ3
[May 25, 2025, 08:57:19 PM]


NIL Money by tower912
[May 25, 2025, 04:50:49 PM]


Congrats to Royce by DoctorV
[May 24, 2025, 10:38:33 PM]


Let's talk about the roster/recruits w/Shaka by Jay Bee
[May 23, 2025, 08:31:14 PM]


Pearson to MU by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[May 23, 2025, 08:12:08 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

dgies9156

Quote from: jsglow on February 24, 2017, 09:15:34 AM
You mean it's sad for the victim at the hands of an alleged rapist.

It's sad for the victim for obvious reasons (have a daughter here, so I can appreciate the anger).

It's sad for the university because their name is sullied because of this.

It's sad for the young man because somehow he did not realize the consequences of his actions.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: jsglow on February 24, 2017, 09:17:51 AM
So TAMU, you're our expert.  Creighton's role at this point is simply full cooperation with the ongoing criminal complaint.  Totally out of their hands at this point, yes?

No. Criminal and school process are completely separate. Creighton has an obligation to investigate and hold their own conduct process....of course, if Mr. Watson is in jail, that process will be permanently suspended. If he were to ever return to Creighton, they would be obligated to resume the process. The other option is that most schools have some sort of student rule that says that students are obligated to follow state and federal laws and failure to do so could result in expulsion. They could enact that rule and all they would have to prove is that he was convicted and then he would be gone.

Of course, this is assuming there are no major changes to Title IX in the near future. DOE just issued a major edit of Title IX yesterday. Didn't impact this area, but its the first time in history that the DOE has ever contradicted a previous DCL on Title IX. Creates a concerning precedent.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


warriorchick

Quote from: wadesworld on February 24, 2017, 09:40:24 AM
If he was leading them to a 25-3 record rather than sitting on the bench with his leg in a cast things might've been very different with their handling of the situation.

Let's hope not. 

You could also argue that since he wasn't able to play anyway (thus eliminating having to make that decision), what's the big deal about letting him participate in Senior Day?
Have some patience, FFS.

jsglow

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on February 24, 2017, 09:58:52 AM
No. Criminal and school process are completely separate. Creighton has an obligation to investigate and hold their own conduct process....of course, if Mr. Watson is in jail, that process will be permanently suspended. If he were to ever return to Creighton, they would be obligated to resume the process. The other option is that most schools have some sort of student rule that says that students are obligated to follow state and federal laws and failure to do so could result in expulsion. They could enact that rule and all they would have to prove is that he was convicted and then he would be gone.

Of course, this is assuming there are no major changes to Title IX in the near future. DOE just issued a major edit of Title IX yesterday. Didn't impact this area, but its the first time in history that the DOE has ever contradicted a previous DCL on Title IX. Creates a concerning precedent.

I gotcha. Makes sense.  Of course Watson isn't so worried about being tossed out of school right now.

jsglow

Quote from: wadesworld on February 24, 2017, 09:40:24 AM
If he was leading them to a 25-3 record rather than sitting on the bench with his leg in a cast things might've been very different with their handling of the situation.

Let's hope not.  I'm glad you used Might've rather that Woulda.

4everwarriors

I'm tired of athletes, politicians, actors and actresses, etc. who think they're important or above da law 'cuz of the completely worthless chit dey get paid for and/or publicity for doin'. Hour society's complete adoration for deez folks is watts sad. Dey all squat like da rest of us.
As for Watson, if da mofo is so damn stupid as to not no wen ta hold it and wen ta squirt it, den he duzzn't deserve the head start and break in life he just pissed down his leg for in an act of a little gratification. Life's a bitch and den ya die. Just tryin' ta keep da pinballs movin', ai na?
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

jsglow

Quote from: dgies9156 on February 24, 2017, 09:43:56 AM
It's sad for the victim for obvious reasons (have a daughter here, so I can appreciate the anger).

It's sad for the university because their name is sullied because of this.

It's sad for the young man because somehow he did not realize the consequences of his actions.

You and I part ways on that one.

jsglow

Quote from: 4everwarriors on February 24, 2017, 10:04:21 AM
I'm tired of athletes, politicians, actors and actresses, etc. who think they're important or above da law 'cuz of the completely worthless chit dey get paid for and/or publicity for doin'. Hour society's complete adoration for deez folks is watts sad. Dey all squat like da rest of us.
As for Watson, if da mofo is so damn stupid as to not no wen ta hold it and wen ta squirt it, den he duzzn't deserve the head start and break in life he just pissed down his leg for in an act of a little gratification. Life's a bitch and den ya die. Just tryin' ta keep da pinballs movin', ai na?

That was some der challenging reading but my view on the matter.

wadesworld

Quote from: jsglow on February 24, 2017, 10:03:22 AM
Let's hope not.  I'm glad you used Might've rather that Woulda.

Quote from: warriorchick on February 24, 2017, 09:59:39 AM
Let's hope not. 

You could also argue that since he wasn't able to play anyway (thus eliminating having to make that decision), what's the big deal about letting him participate in Senior Day?

No doubt.  I hope that nothing would've changed, but winning often talks in big time athletics.

jsglow

Quote from: wadesworld on February 24, 2017, 10:14:36 AM
No doubt.  I hope that nothing would've changed, but winning often talks in big time athletics.

I have more faith in Dan Hendrickson than that.

MerrittsMustache

Quote from: wadesworld on February 24, 2017, 10:14:36 AM
No doubt.  I hope that nothing would've changed, but winning often talks in big time athletics.

I have confidence that a Jesuit institution like Creighton would have suspended Watson regardless.

Also, had he been healthy, it's reasonable to believe that he wouldn't have been out at 3am on a game day to begin with.


MerrittsMustache

Quote from: jsglow on February 24, 2017, 10:05:20 AM
You and I part ways on that one.

If he's guilty, I'd feel no sympathy for Watson. However, I do believe that it's a sad situation when a young man who appeared to be a good kid and model citizen commits an awful, potentially life-ruining act.


jsglow

Quote from: MerrittsMustache on February 24, 2017, 10:25:53 AM
If he's guilty, I'd feel no sympathy for Watson. However, I do believe that it's a sad situation when a young man who appeared to be a good kid and model citizen commits an awful, potentially life-ruining act.

Fair enough.  I'll feel sad for his family.

forgetful

Quote from: MerrittsMustache on February 24, 2017, 10:20:18 AM
I have confidence that a Jesuit institution like Creighton would have suspended Watson regardless.

Also, had he been healthy, it's reasonable to believe that he wouldn't have been out at 3am on a game day to begin with.

Careful, not saying they wouldn't have, but one of the reasons they are coming down on this particularly hard may stem from a case earlier this year where they were accused of mishandling a sexual assault claim.

http://www.omaha.com/news/education/unhappy-with-creighton-s-sexual-consent-policy-students-hold-yes/article_38176e06-f545-11e6-addf-87af933c8bb2.html

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: warriorchick on February 24, 2017, 09:14:12 AM
And kudos to Creighton for taking it seriously as well.  There are more than a few schools who would have pulled the "innocent until proven guilty" nonsense regardless of the evidence.

Yes....but the cynic in me wonders that if Mo Watson wasn't hurt would Creighton be stalling on this investigation.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: forgetful on February 24, 2017, 10:29:52 AM
Careful, not saying they wouldn't have, but one of the reasons they are coming down on this particularly hard may stem from a case earlier this year where they were accused of mishandling a sexual assault claim.

http://www.omaha.com/news/education/unhappy-with-creighton-s-sexual-consent-policy-students-hold-yes/article_38176e06-f545-11e6-addf-87af933c8bb2.html

Possible, but to be honest, just about every school has been accused of mishandling a sexual assault case in the past 6 years. Its become a part of the process.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


jsglow

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on February 24, 2017, 10:37:41 AM
Yes....but the cynic in me wonders that if Mo Watson wasn't hurt would Creighton be stalling on this investigation.

Personally, I already think he got special treatment when he was allowed to leave the state.  This morning's article indicates that he's not in custody just yet.  I'm sure he faces a very strict deadline to turn himself in.

GGGG

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on February 24, 2017, 09:58:52 AM
No. Criminal and school process are completely separate. Creighton has an obligation to investigate and hold their own conduct process....of course, if Mr. Watson is in jail, that process will be permanently suspended. If he were to ever return to Creighton, they would be obligated to resume the process. The other option is that most schools have some sort of student rule that says that students are obligated to follow state and federal laws and failure to do so could result in expulsion. They could enact that rule and all they would have to prove is that he was convicted and then he would be gone.

Of course, this is assuming there are no major changes to Title IX in the near future. DOE just issued a major edit of Title IX yesterday. Didn't impact this area, but its the first time in history that the DOE has ever contradicted a previous DCL on Title IX. Creates a concerning precedent.


In addition, I think a couple things need to be made clear to Watson's teammates.  First, under no way are they to have contact with the alleged victim or encourage others to do so.  Second, while they may wish to be supportive of their teammate, such support cannot include obstructing the investigation by the local police or University officials in any manner.

jsglow

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on February 24, 2017, 10:41:13 AM
Possible, but to be honest, just about every school has been accused of mishandling a sexual assault case in the past 6 years. Its become a part of the process.

I agree with TAMU here.  Morning regret doesn't necessarily constitute a crime.  But in this day of social media.......

I bet you deal with that all the time.  Hard to judge sometimes for sure.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: jsglow on February 24, 2017, 10:01:23 AM
I gotcha. Makes sense.  Of course Watson isn't so worried about being tossed out of school right now.

That's often the rub in these situations. Students have much more pressing matters that they just forfeit their conduct case. For example, I work closely with the conduct office and sometimes serve on conduct panels. Most of the time I end up hearing drug cases (though one time I got to hear a case on a prank involving a hand grenade. That was fun). Students hire lawyers to advise them on both their criminal drug case and their conduct case. The lawyers 9 times out of 10, tell them to plead the 5th for the conduct case to avoid any possibility of it damaging their criminal case. Unfortunately, that means the panel only has the police and conduct reports to consider when making their decision.

But it doesn't really matter I guess, all of the drug cases I have heard where there are also criminal charges have ended up with the student in jail.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


mu03eng

Fist degree sexual assault charges aren't a "run of the mill" he said/she said situation that sits in this grey area we are trying to make less grey right now. To bring that type of charge is a serious issue and one would think a significant amount of direct evidence (DNA, medical, witnesses, etc)

I would hope that any university would take direct and overt action in these types of situations as there should be no grey. I would certainly expect Marquette to do so.

"A Plan? Oh man, I hate plans. That means were gonna have to do stuff. Can't we just have a strategy......or a mission statement."

4everwarriors

Quote from: jsglow on February 24, 2017, 10:29:16 AM
Fair enough.  I'll feel sad for his family.


Den somewear along da wey, maybe kin shoulda taught 'im wright from wrong, ai na?
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

Mods, Delete me please. 8/26/2020

Quote from: warriorchick on February 24, 2017, 09:14:12 AM
And kudos to Creighton for taking it seriously as well.  There are more than a few schools who would have pulled the "innocent until proven guilty" nonsense regardless of the evidence.

Nonsense???   I don't know the details of this particular case, but are you sure you want to throw out due process in the era of Duke Lacrosse/UVA Jackie/Lena Dunham?

GGGG

Quote from: MUunderpants on February 24, 2017, 11:48:53 AM
Nonsense???   I don't know the details of this particular case, but are you sure you want to throw out due process in the era of Duke Lacrosse/UVA Jackie/Lena Dunham?


Creighton has every right to limit Watson's ability to participate in athletic activities under its code of conduct. They do not have to meet the "innocent until proven guilty" standard.

mu03eng

Quote from: Dr. Vinnie Boombatz on February 24, 2017, 11:59:18 AM

Creighton has every right to limit Watson's ability to participate in athletic activities under its code of conduct. They do not have to meet the "innocent until proven guilty" standard.

This.

Universities can and should take an aggressive position on their code of conduct enforcement. Just like all students should take an aggressive position on trying to avoid situations that could put you in jeopardy of a code violation of this magnitude.
"A Plan? Oh man, I hate plans. That means were gonna have to do stuff. Can't we just have a strategy......or a mission statement."

Previous topic - Next topic