collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Congrats to Royce by cheebs09
[May 21, 2025, 08:35:29 PM]


More conference realignment talk by WhiteTrash
[May 21, 2025, 02:05:42 PM]


Scouting Report: Ian Miletic by mug644
[May 20, 2025, 06:40:19 PM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by MuggsyB
[May 20, 2025, 06:27:04 PM]


NM by marqfan22
[May 20, 2025, 05:53:46 PM]


Marquette vs Oklahoma by dgies9156
[May 20, 2025, 12:25:50 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

Warrior of Law

Gone is the 4-1 series with UWM and UWGB. UW-Madison will never lower themselves to playing a road game at UWM or UWGB.  Of course, when MU does it, the horror!

Badgers men's basketball: Wisconsin will no longer play at UW-Milwaukee, UW-Green Bay http://host.madison.com/sports/college/basketball/men/article_8cf7dbcc-044f-5fe6-85b3-2e0bbd124536.html
"You can only protect your liberties in this world by protecting the other man's freedom. You can only be free if I am free."  Clarence Darrow

Nukem2


brewcity77

This takes any negotiating power those schools had with us as well. I don't care what UWM and UWGB do, but they can't play the "UW-Madison plays at our gym" card. Could allow us to offer them as buy games going forward. That's the only way we should consider playing them.

fjm

Well according to MUFNY and his very close sources, we will definitely be the ones filling that void left by the Badgers with a 3-1 deal.

wadesworld

It's because they lost to UWM this year.

Herman Cain

Quote from: brewcity77 on August 26, 2016, 05:12:51 PM
This takes any negotiating power those schools had with us as well. I don't care what UWM and UWGB do, but they can't play the "UW-Madison plays at our gym" card. Could allow us to offer them as buy games going forward. That's the only way we should consider playing them.
This is excellent news for us. It definitely brings UWM and UWGB to a more reasonable position. I still believe there is upside for us to scheduling these two at home in the period when the kids are out of school. For them they will get to play in our fancy new arena when it is built.
"It was a Great Day until it wasn't"
    ——Rory McIlroy on Final Round at Pinehurst

chapman

Article makes it seem like Gard is driving the decision.  Can't blame him for taking the position.  Most years make me fine with a 4-1 if we could have gotten it, but if the scheduling improves to look more like this year than last, it won't be necessary to be making five year commitments with anyone.

Spotcheck Billy

Might the BIG? expanding the conference season to 20 be a factor in this?

GGGG

Quote from: chapman on August 26, 2016, 08:47:03 PM
Article makes it seem like Gard is driving the decision. 


I might be wrong, but I don't think UW played at Milwaukee or Green Bay prior to Bo (or Bennett?) being the coach, and I always thought it was a nod to the other state schools where both Bo and Bennett had their roots.

While Gard has those same roots, I think the 4-1 idea just isn't feasible for them any longer.  Just like for Marquette.

MarquetteDano

I am sure papers all over the state will be saying how bad this is for basketball in the state of Wisconsin and how UW-Madison is "ducking" UWM.

::)

WarriorFan

I still want an "all Wisconsin" early season tournament with the 4 D1 teams getting 2 games each and maybe incorporating the best 2 of the D3 teams.  It needs to alternate between Madison and Milwaukee.  I'd much rather see MU play UWSP / UWGB / Madison than Grambling State and Presbyterian.  This would be a sell-out every year.
"The meaning of life isn't gnashing our bicuspids over what comes after death but tasting the tiny moments that come before it."

Brewtown Andy

Quote from: WarriorFan on August 29, 2016, 12:19:46 AM
I still want an "all Wisconsin" early season tournament with the 4 D1 teams getting 2 games each and maybe incorporating the best 2 of the D3 teams.  It needs to alternate between Madison and Milwaukee.  I'd much rather see MU play UWSP / UWGB / Madison than Grambling State and Presbyterian.  This would be a sell-out every year.

Since Marquette didn't sell out the BC against UWM or UWGB, I fail to see how UWSP would be any better.
Twitter - @brewtownandy
Anonymous Eagle

Brewtown Andy

Quote from: Waldo Jeffers on August 27, 2016, 10:24:15 AM
Might the BIG? expanding the conference season to 20 be a factor in this?

That's not an official thing yet, is it?

Either way, it's definitely a reason why they wouldn't want to be locked in for two specific non-con games for the next five years.
Twitter - @brewtownandy
Anonymous Eagle

Galway Eagle

Quote from: WarriorFan on August 29, 2016, 12:19:46 AM
I still want an "all Wisconsin" early season tournament with the 4 D1 teams getting 2 games each and maybe incorporating the best 2 of the D3 teams.  It needs to alternate between Madison and Milwaukee.  I'd much rather see MU play UWSP / UWGB / Madison than Grambling State and Presbyterian.  This would be a sell-out every year.

I'd agree if we're going to do exhibitions it should be against a UW-WW or UW-SP rather than msoe or St. John's MI but to say we should have those D3 schools in the regular season is wayyy out there.
Retire Terry Rand's jersey!

jsglow

Some of you young guys might not know this.  As evidence of how truly far scheduling has come as a science, Marquette and Wisconsin used to play twice per year including the traditional home/home that remains on the schedule. 

In addition, UW traveled to Milwaukee EVERY year to participate in Marquette's Milwaukee Classic. I attended many of those holiday opening night doubleheaders where WI would open the night with their respective cupcake followed by the nightcap featuring Marquette and its victim.  Of course the goal was to have MU/WI face off for the championship the following night.  (I have this very vague recollection that one years somebody screwed up and didn't win that opening cupcake game.)

Bucky finally pulled out when Marquette refused to allow the Classic to rotate to Madison's court every other year.  thereafter, some rando 'quality' opponent filled the Badger slot but it was never the same.

GGGG

Quote from: WarriorFan on August 29, 2016, 12:19:46 AM
I still want an "all Wisconsin" early season tournament with the 4 D1 teams getting 2 games each and maybe incorporating the best 2 of the D3 teams.  It needs to alternate between Madison and Milwaukee.  I'd much rather see MU play UWSP / UWGB / Madison than Grambling State and Presbyterian.  This would be a sell-out every year.


That is just an awful idea.  We already play Madison every year.  Milwaukee and Green Bay are in the same conference.  And D3 schools are basically good enough to be exhibition fodder and that's about it.

Benny B

Quote from: The Sultan of Sunshine on August 27, 2016, 10:33:22 AM

I might be wrong, but I don't think UW played at Milwaukee or Green Bay prior to Bo (or Bennett?) being the coach, and I always thought it was a nod to the other state schools where both Bo and Bennett had their roots.

While Gard has those same roots, I think the 4-1 idea just isn't feasible for them any longer.  Just like for Marquette.

It likely didn't start out this way, but this is most likely the reason it was happening just before it ended.
Quote from: LittleMurs on January 08, 2015, 07:10:33 PM
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

Previous topic - Next topic