collapse

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!


Author Topic: Texas Plumber Sues Car Dealer After His Truck Ends Up on Syria’s Front Lines  (Read 1037 times)

Tugg Speedman

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8836


Texas Plumber Sues Car Dealer After His Truck Ends Up on Syria’s Front Lines
By CHRISTINE HAUSERDEC. 14, 2015

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/15/us/texas-plumber-sues-car-dealer-after-his-truck-ends-up-on-syrias-front-lines.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur

A Texas plumber has filed a lawsuit against a car dealership after a used truck he sold showed up on the front lines in Syria being used by Islamist fighters. The logo and phone number of his company, Mark-1 Plumbing, were still visible on the doors.

After images of the truck appeared online, the plumber, Mark Oberholtzer of Galveston County, claims he lost business and received hundreds of threats that accused him of being a terrorist sympathizer. Mr. Oberholtzer is seeking more than $1 million in damages, in a lawsuit filed last week, according to his lawyer, Craig Eiland. A copy of the lawsuit was provided to The New York Times.

Mr. Oberholtzer’s truck began its strange journey from fixing leaky pipes in suburban Texas to the Syrian battlefield in 2013.

In October of that year, the lawsuit said, Mr. Oberholtzer handed over the 2005 Ford F-250 truck to AutoNation Ford Gulf Freeway in Houston as part of a trade-in deal for a newer model.

As the paperwork was being completed, Mr. Oberholtzer’s son started peeling off the decal on the truck that showed the phone number and name of the company, but the salesman told him to stop because it would harm the paint and said it would be removed later, the lawsuit said.

According to the lawsuit, the dealer sold the truck at auction in November 2013, and it was exported from Houston to Mersin, Turkey, the following month.

From Turkey, it apparently made its way to Syria and wound up being adapted to carry an antiaircraft gun in its flatbed manned by jihadi fighters, the lawsuit said.

Mr. Oberholtzer apparently thought little of it. But in December 2014, images of the truck and the weapon being fired were published on social media. The lawsuit included one such example, taken from the Twitter account of a writer in Illinois who reports on jihadist groups and who said a Chechen was “using plumbing truck against regime in Aleppo.”

Mr. Oberholtzer’s secretary called him on Dec. 17, 2014, and told him there were news stories about it. Coverage started to spread, including a widely viewed segment, as the lawsuit notes, on “The Colbert Report,” which made light of it.

“That country is going down the toilet,” Stephen Colbert, the host, said referring to Syria. “But for the first time, they know who to call to unclog it.”

By the end of that day, the lawsuit said, there were thousands of harassing and threatening phone calls to Mr. Oberholtzer’s office and other phone numbers with accusations that he supported terrorists. His staff and family members have also been subject to threatening calls, Mr. Eiland said.

Mr. Oberholtzer said his business had suffered. Department of Homeland Security and Federal Bureau of Investigation agents met with him and advised him to protect himself, the lawsuit said. He started carrying a handgun.

In September, after excerpts from the Colbert segment aired during an Emmy Awards ceremony, the calls to Mr. Oberholtzer flared up again, averaging 100 to 200 every day, the lawsuit said.

Nobody answered a phone call to the car dealership on Monday. Mr. Oberholtzer could not be reached either, but his lawyer, Mr. Eiland, said in a telephone interview that the family’s plumbing company, which has been in operation since 1984 and was also named as a plaintiff in the case, was still getting threats as news of the lawsuit spread.

According to Mr. Eiland, one of the callers said, “How can you call yourself American if you are supplying vehicles to ISIS?”



Skatastrophy

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5568
  • ✅ Verified Member
Politics

brandx

  • Guest
So?

MU Fan in Connecticut

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3468
Just a bizarre story.

Spotcheck Billy

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2239
The lawsuit is new but the story is over a year old (12/2014).

Tugg Speedman

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8836
Ok maybe this should now go into politics as this is an interesting angle.

The Unexpected Explanation How "That Ford Truck" Ended Up In ISIS Hands

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-12-15/stunning-explanation-how-infamous-ford-f250-truck-ended-isis-hands

<highlight>

And while NATO-member Turkey supplying ISIS with funding, supplies, weapons or equipment is hardly groundbreaking news, the Ford "clue" poses new and important questions, such as:

* who is the Turkish party that ordered and paid for the Ford truck's transfer to Turkey, and subsequently received compensation from the Islamic State in the subsequent resale?

* which is the US party which transacts with Turkish counterparts, who ultimately ship US products to Islamic State fighters?

* is the US party aware that its Turkish counterparty has dealings with ISIS

* what is the role of the US government in all of this, because it would be surprising that an administration that has sworn it would crack down on all outside assistance to the Islamic State would be unaware that "made in the USA" trucks ended up in the Islamic State by way of its faitful NATO ally, Turkey.

* how many other such vehicles sold  in the US and exported to Turkey, have  made their way to the Islamic State

We are confident that it will be relatively easy for any aspiring reporter to track down the US-based exporter of the Ford truck (and thus recipient of Turkish funds), just as it will be facile to uncover who was the Turkish buyer who signed the receipt invoice in Mersin, Turkey. What may be more difficult to uncover is whether the governments of the US and Turkey, respectively, were or are appraised about transactions such as this one, and if not, then why not?

We hope to be able to answer as many of the above as possible in the very near future.