collapse

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!


Author Topic: Eventually, only sports fans will pay for cable  (Read 769 times)

Tugg Speedman

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8836
Eventually, only sports fans will pay for cable
« on: October 22, 2015, 03:34:46 PM »

Eventually, only sports fans will pay for cable
October 22, 2015

http://www.businessinsider.com/the-number-of-us-households-paying-for-tv-declining-2015-10

Eventually, only sports fans will have cable.

In a new report released Thursday, Citi analysts Jason Bazinet, Thomas Singlehurst, Michael Rollings, Mark May, and Catherine O'Neill examine the future of media in a report titled, "The Curtain Falls: How Silicon Valley is Challenging Hollywood."

And one of the most alarming trends for cable TV's entrenched players is the percentage of US households that are paying for cable.

In the first quarter of 2011, about 84% of all US households were cable subscribers. By the first quarter of this year, that number had fallen to 80%.

And perhaps the most troubling part of this trend for cable providers is that over this period, household formation in the US has increased, indicating that new, millennial homeowners aren't cutting the cable cord but altogether skipping the bundle.



nd this isn't getting better anytime soon.

"Going forward, we expect pay TV penetration rates to continue to fall," the analysts write.

"Indeed, we expect more consumers to cut the cord entirely. Over the long-run, we expect the pay TV penetration in the US to mirror Europe: only sports enthusiasts will subscribe to pay TV. That's because sports isn’t available on [subscription video on demand] platforms."

And so as cable subscribers fall, Citi expects that the value of media companies could fall 20%-60%, with Viacom getting hit hardest.

The only winner? Disney.

Why? ESPN.

As Citi details, ESPN is just about the only cable channel that could command any sort of meaningful premium in an "over-the-top" or standalone offering outside the cable bundle.



As for why the media companies wouldn't do this, Citi thinks there are three main challenges.

For one, most media companies don't have the skills or capability to deal with functions like billing, customer services, and technical support.

Additionally, selling directly to consumers while also relying on distributors like Comcast and Time Warner Cable for affiliate fees is a tricky balance, as in effect you're undercutting your own content distribution partners by going over their heads.

But perhaps most challenging is that media companies like Disney and Viacom have increased the cost of carrying their networks by 8%-10%. Meanwhile, content distributors have only raised prices 3%-4% on consumers, meaning that were a company like Disney to go direct-to-consumer, they'd lose about half of their pricing power.


brandx

  • Guest
Re: Eventually, only sports fans will pay for cable
« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2015, 09:19:28 PM »
You're wrong again.

The sports networks will move to a standalone model as cable usage goes down.

ChicosBailBonds

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22695
  • #AllInnocentLivesMatter
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Eventually, only sports fans will pay for cable
« Reply #2 on: October 22, 2015, 10:03:55 PM »
Nielsen just revealed their long awaited (2 years in the making) total video ratings called Total Audience.

90% of video viewing is.......... on television.

http://informitv.com/2015/10/18/television-viewing-still-dominant/


By the way, those cable guys will own much of the OTT providers or control the pipes so they're not really going to care either way, the money will still be going to them.

Tugg Speedman

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8836
Re: Eventually, only sports fans will pay for cable
« Reply #3 on: October 23, 2015, 05:48:07 AM »
You're wrong again.

The sports networks will move to a standalone model as cable usage goes down.

You mean that Citibank is wrong as I did not write it.

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: Eventually, only sports fans will pay for cable
« Reply #4 on: October 23, 2015, 07:42:46 AM »
Nielsen just revealed their long awaited (2 years in the making) total video ratings called Total Audience.

90% of video viewing is.......... on television.

http://informitv.com/2015/10/18/television-viewing-still-dominant/


The history of innovation is littered with articles like this one.  They do a great job of describing the current state of affairs, but in retrospect many of them look rather foolish.

ChicosBailBonds

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22695
  • #AllInnocentLivesMatter
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Eventually, only sports fans will pay for cable
« Reply #5 on: October 23, 2015, 09:20:41 AM »
It's just the data, 90% are viewing television.

Yes, eventually things will change.....quite a long way down the road.  The OTT guys aren't making any real money right now sans Netflix, and they make a pittence compared to the other guys.

Here's the deal, many of those networks listed by Heisenburg, cannot survive a la carte because the only reason they even exist is because of the bundle.  Does Madmen ever get created on their network without existing in the bundle in the first place?  Unlikely.

The model will change, it always does. It has many times over in the 15+ years I've been in the gig, but people are failing to look at the bigger picture of how entertainment works, the seed money involved, the ENORMOUS amount of money to get a hit, market, etc.

 

feedback