Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Pearson to MU by willie warrior
[Today at 06:07:05 PM]


Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by wiscwarrior
[Today at 06:06:26 PM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by brewcity77
[Today at 04:37:52 PM]


Mid-season grades by Jay Bee
[Today at 02:05:55 PM]


Kam update by MUbiz
[Today at 01:53:14 PM]


NIL Money by The Sultan
[Today at 01:03:40 PM]


Marquette/Indiana Finalizing Agreement by PointWarrior
[Today at 09:52:07 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


Chicos' Buzz Scandal Countdown

An oft-cited article by those west of Milwaukee is this gem from 2004 which claimed that Wisconsin generated more fortune 500 CEOs than any other university.

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2004/8/6/wisconsin-harvard-have-most-ceos-harvard/

I came across an updated article, however, and UW doesn't make the top 38 institutions among the same metric.

http://www.bestcolleges.com/features/colleges-with-highest-number-fortune-500-ceo-graduates/

Doing my best to try and understand how both could be even partially true... unless there has been a mass-exodus of 100% of UW CEOs, how else could this be the case?
"Half a billion we used to do about every two months...or as my old boss would say, 'you're on the hook for $8 million a day come hell or high water-.    Never missed in 6 years." - Chico apropos of nothing

GGGG

It's not the same metric.  The 2004 article is S&P 500, which are 500 public companies that represent various sectors of the US economy.

The second is Fortune 500, which are the 500 largest public and private corporations in the US.

http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/033115/what-difference-between-sp-500-and-fortune-500.asp

The overlap between the two is about 280 or so.  Also 11 years is a long time in corporate governance.  I wouldn't doubt that 80% of the CEOs on either list have turned over during that timeframe. 


Chicos' Buzz Scandal Countdown

Quote from: The Sultan of Sunshine on September 25, 2015, 03:27:40 PM
It's not the same metric.  The 2004 article is S&P 500, which are 500 public companies that represent various sectors of the US economy.

The second is Fortune 500, which are the 500 largest public and private corporations in the US.

http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/033115/what-difference-between-sp-500-and-fortune-500.asp

The overlap between the two is about 280 or so.  Also 11 years is a long time in corporate governance.  I wouldn't doubt that 80% of the CEOs on either list have turned over during that timeframe.
AHA! Genuinely missed that one.... too many groups of 500

gracias
"Half a billion we used to do about every two months...or as my old boss would say, 'you're on the hook for $8 million a day come hell or high water-.    Never missed in 6 years." - Chico apropos of nothing

4everwarriors

Free the Indianapolis 500, hey?
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

Previous topic - Next topic