Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Why RGV? Maybe $400 million donors at other Power 4 schools? by Zog from Margo
[Today at 11:19:17 PM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by MuggsyB
[Today at 10:44:38 PM]


Is Shaka doubling down or just protecting his guys? by 1SE
[Today at 10:16:08 PM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by MU82
[Today at 09:47:07 PM]


Update your win total by WhiteTrash
[Today at 07:14:30 PM]


OT: Seven students revived with Narcam by Jay Bee
[Today at 03:45:54 PM]


Stats by UncleOliver
[Today at 03:18:36 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


jesmu84

https://www.youtube.com/v/yfGOJKbqrWk

When it comes to topics like this, how should we as a society approach it? Should it be a free market response - ie, consumers get sick, companies get punished (financially or otherwise) and then companies change? Or should this be government intervention ahead of time - ie, restrictions, inspections, regulations, etc? It's a tough line to walk.

I understand that companies are out to make a profit, and therefore aren't necessarily going to do things to protect/benefit consumer if the costs outweigh the benefits. In that case, however, don't we rely on the government to protect us? If so, why are we so woefully underfunded and undermanned when it comes to our regulatory bodies (in this case, UDSA, FDA, etc)

Previous topic - Next topic