Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

MU/UCONN Game Thread by panda
[Today at 08:36:55 PM]


Beat X on Wednesday by tower912
[Today at 08:34:02 PM]


The Altercation by Elonsmusk
[Today at 08:31:42 PM]


New Strategy? by tower912
[Today at 08:30:24 PM]


Nationally Televised Games by NCMUFan
[Today at 08:26:38 PM]


Sean Jones- coaching salary? by jesmu84
[Today at 08:26:11 PM]


[Paint Touches] Marquette Minutes Projections for 2026 by DoctorV
[Today at 08:25:59 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


jesmu84

https://www.youtube.com/v/yfGOJKbqrWk

When it comes to topics like this, how should we as a society approach it? Should it be a free market response - ie, consumers get sick, companies get punished (financially or otherwise) and then companies change? Or should this be government intervention ahead of time - ie, restrictions, inspections, regulations, etc? It's a tough line to walk.

I understand that companies are out to make a profit, and therefore aren't necessarily going to do things to protect/benefit consumer if the costs outweigh the benefits. In that case, however, don't we rely on the government to protect us? If so, why are we so woefully underfunded and undermanned when it comes to our regulatory bodies (in this case, UDSA, FDA, etc)

Previous topic - Next topic