collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Fru to Mu by wadesworld
[Today at 06:39:36 AM]


2026 Transfer Portal by tower912
[Today at 06:26:31 AM]


Recruiting as of 4/15/26 by TallTitan34
[April 18, 2026, 11:22:38 PM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by Its DJOver
[April 18, 2026, 07:11:26 PM]


Good luck to Chase at Portsmouth by #UnleashThePortal
[April 18, 2026, 06:36:37 PM]


NM by MU82
[April 18, 2026, 05:04:51 PM]


MIA MINESSALE COMMITTS by burger
[April 18, 2026, 03:23:08 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


jesmu84

https://www.youtube.com/v/yfGOJKbqrWk

When it comes to topics like this, how should we as a society approach it? Should it be a free market response - ie, consumers get sick, companies get punished (financially or otherwise) and then companies change? Or should this be government intervention ahead of time - ie, restrictions, inspections, regulations, etc? It's a tough line to walk.

I understand that companies are out to make a profit, and therefore aren't necessarily going to do things to protect/benefit consumer if the costs outweigh the benefits. In that case, however, don't we rely on the government to protect us? If so, why are we so woefully underfunded and undermanned when it comes to our regulatory bodies (in this case, UDSA, FDA, etc)

Previous topic - Next topic