collapse

Resources

Stud of Georgetown Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Who are we holding out most hope for yet? by Pakuni
[Today at 08:14:55 AM]


2026 Transfer Portal Wishlist by WhiteTrash
[Today at 08:13:50 AM]


How many guys stay? by GoldenWarrior11
[Today at 08:07:55 AM]


Zaide Didn’t Travel With Team by NCMUFan
[Today at 08:02:37 AM]


MU/Creighton Game Thread by Billy Hoyle
[Today at 07:52:52 AM]


A question for the Scoop elders by WhiteTrash
[Today at 07:41:12 AM]


Ross Not Start? by CountryRoads
[Today at 07:22:39 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

MattVelazquezSays

Marquette win over Seton Hall provides glimpse at future

On Saturday afternoon, the Golden Eagles gave everyone a look at what that future might hold in a 57-54 win at Seton Hall.

Source: Marquette win over Seton Hall provides glimpse at future

UticaBusBarn

Quote from: MattVelazquezSays on February 07, 2015, 05:30:06 PM
Marquette win over Seton Hall provides glimpse at future

On Saturday afternoon, the Golden Eagles gave everyone a look at what that future might hold in a 57-54 win at Seton Hall.

Source: Marquette win over Seton Hall provides glimpse at future


As always, a thoughtful and well written article.

Sort of interesting that no one picked-up on how much better the production of the underclassmen was as compared to the seniors. Seems the flavour of the year during the 2013-14 season was, "the season is over NCAA wise, so play the underclassmen all the time."

Of course, the bench was a bit longer last season. :)

mu-rara

Quote from: UticaBusBarn on February 09, 2015, 08:15:55 AM

As always, a thoughtful and well written article.

Sort of interesting that no one picked-up on how much better the production of the underclassmen was as compared to the seniors. Seems the flavour of the year during the 2013-14 season was, "the season is over NCAA wise, so play the underclassmen all the time."

Of course, the bench was a bit longer last season. :)
No issues with playing the underclassmen if they are earning the time.

Previous topic - Next topic