collapse

* Recent Posts

2024 Transfer Portal by MU82
[Today at 09:55:19 PM]


[Paint Touches] Big East programs ranked by NBA representation by jfp61
[Today at 09:52:58 PM]


So....What are we ranked on Monday - 11/1/2024? by MuggsyB
[Today at 08:11:50 PM]


Banquet by Skatastrophy
[Today at 06:50:03 PM]


Recruiting as of 3/15/24 by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[Today at 06:37:34 PM]


Big East 2024 Offseason by MU82
[Today at 06:32:11 PM]


D-I Logo Quiz by SoCalEagle
[Today at 01:23:01 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!


Author Topic: 2014-15 college football thread  (Read 36364 times)

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: 2014-15 college football thread
« Reply #125 on: January 02, 2015, 01:41:13 PM »
TCU and Baylor were conference co-champions.

OSU's SOS was marginally better but their one loss was significantly worse.


It doesn't matter if their one loss was worse - there was no provision for "not having a worse loss" in the selection process.

Ohio State's overall schedule was stronger, and since each team had equal records (OSU with the extra game), it makes perfect sense why they were chosen - they played overall a stronger schedule. 

4everwarriors

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 16017
Re: 2014-15 college football thread
« Reply #126 on: January 02, 2015, 01:58:00 PM »
So, did Winston intentionally fumble toward O's goal?
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

MerrittsMustache

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4676
Re: 2014-15 college football thread
« Reply #127 on: January 05, 2015, 07:57:31 AM »

It doesn't matter if their one loss was worse - there was no provision for "not having a worse loss" in the selection process.

Ohio State's overall schedule was stronger, and since each team had equal records (OSU with the extra game), it makes perfect sense why they were chosen - they played overall a stronger schedule. 

Any system that drops a team 3 places after winning a conference game by 52 points is a seriously flawed system.

In the end, it once again all came down to money.

wadesworld

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 17549
Re: 2014-15 college football thread
« Reply #128 on: January 05, 2015, 08:40:27 AM »
Any system that drops a team 3 places after winning a conference game by 52 points is a seriously flawed system.

In the end, it once again all came down to money.


Well stated.
Rocket Trigger Warning (wild that saying this would trigger anyone, but it's the world we live in): Black Lives Matter

 

feedback