collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Media Rights Update by StillAWarrior
[Today at 01:55:39 PM]


IU vs MU preview by Scoop Snoop
[Today at 12:30:25 PM]


More conference realignment talk by The Sultan
[Today at 08:26:22 AM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[July 07, 2025, 11:14:59 PM]


To the Rafters by sodakmu87
[July 07, 2025, 09:29:49 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by brewcity77
[July 07, 2025, 02:10:17 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by Jay Bee
[July 07, 2025, 11:51:18 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

NersEllenson

Was reviewing Pomroy today and just found it remarkable - what we all know - that our starting lineup is comprised of 4 guys who Pomroy defines as Limited Roles and Role Players.  Meanwhile, the one "Go to Guy" the highest rating Pomroy assigns - Deonte Burton - gets some DNP's.  "Major Contributor," Davante Gardner gets less than 30 minutes per game, and "Significant Contributor" Todd Mayo gets less than 30 minutes per game.  It's remarkable.  The guys Pomroy Defines in the lowest category "Limited Roles," Jake and Derrick get the highest percentage of minutes of any of our players - Derrick 74.9 and Jake 70.9.

At some point, why do you not just acknowledge reality and roll out:

Gardner
Jamil
Burton
Mayo
Derrick

Derrick's warts would be greatly limited if he was playing with the team's Go To, and Major Contributors....but to consistently pair him with the two lowest categories per Pomroy - it just amplifies the warts that much more.

In my view, the above lineup would give you the best combination of everything....Pomroy's data is unbelievably predictive...why ignore it any more??
"I'm not sure Cadougan would fix the problems on this team. I'm not even convinced he would be better for this team than DeWil is."

BrewCity77, December 8, 2013

NavinRJohnson

I'm glad to see a new thread started on this topic. It's about time it was discussed around here.

Windyplayer

Quote from: NavinRJohnson on March 04, 2014, 10:40:41 AM
I'm glad to see a new thread started on this topic. It's about time it was discussed around here.
The longer these silly starting line-ups are used, the more posts we'll have like these. And I'm perfectly OK with that as long as you bring in new data to highlight the lunacy of these line-ups, which Ners did.

g0lden3agle

Ners, could you help me understand how posession% can be used to dictate what lineups would be most effective?  The lineup you proposed currently has a collective posession% of 116.1%.  So to have those 5 out on the court all at the same time each player would generally end up with the ball less than what they are currently getting.  Isn't spreading the minutes out like we currently are allowing our main scorers (davante, jamil, mayo, to an extent burton) to get a high number of touches?

LAMUfan

Burton and Gardner should not play at the same time, having Burton on the floor takes Gardner out of the offense (anyone else notice that?).  Would love to see Burton start over Juan, and play all of the time that Chris is in (about 15 min).  That would give you some scoring with the "1st team", and continue Gardner's ability to score once you take Chris out. 

willie warrior

Quote from: LAMUfan on March 04, 2014, 11:16:17 AM
Burton and Gardner should not play at the same time, having Burton on the floor takes Gardner out of the offense (anyone else notice that?).  Would love to see Burton start over Juan, and play all of the time that Chris is in (about 15 min).  That would give you some scoring with the "1st team", and continue Gardner's ability to score once you take Chris out. 
Burton should be starting over Juan. Better scorer, shooter, rebounder and just as aggressive. Juan gets a slight nod on D, but not by much. Just another strange thing by Buzz, just like starting Otule over Gardner
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind. Rick Pitino: "You can either complain or adapt."

keefe

Quote from: Ners on March 04, 2014, 10:36:38 AM
Was reviewing Pomroy today and just found it remarkable - what we all know - that our starting lineup is comprised of 4 guys who Pomroy defines as Limited Roles and Role Players.  Meanwhile, the one "Go to Guy" the highest rating Pomroy assigns - Deonte Burton - gets some DNP's.  "Major Contributor," Davante Gardner gets less than 30 minutes per game, and "Significant Contributor" Todd Mayo gets less than 30 minutes per game.  It's remarkable.  The guys Pomroy Defines in the lowest category "Limited Roles," Jake and Derrick get the highest percentage of minutes of any of our players - Derrick 74.9 and Jake 70.9.

At some point, why do you not just acknowledge reality and roll out:

Gardner
Jamil
Burton
Mayo
Derrick

Derrick's warts would be greatly limited if he was playing with the team's Go To, and Major Contributors....but to consistently pair him with the two lowest categories per Pomroy - it just amplifies the warts that much more.

In my view, the above lineup would give you the best combination of everything....Pomroy's data is unbelievably predictive...why ignore it any more??

Yea, but what the hell does this Pomeroy guy know about college basketball?


Death on call

NersEllenson

Quote from: g0lden3agle on March 04, 2014, 11:03:34 AM
Ners, could you help me understand how posession% can be used to dictate what lineups would be most effective?  The lineup you proposed currently has a collective posession% of 116.1%.  So to have those 5 out on the court all at the same time each player would generally end up with the ball less than what they are currently getting.  Isn't spreading the minutes out like we currently are allowing our main scorers (davante, jamil, mayo, to an extent burton) to get a high number of touches?

That's a good question, and point that I can't speak to.  However, what is absolutely true is that while overall opportunities (possession %) might be reduced by 16% spread out over 4 guys (as Derrick is playing with this lineup and his usage wouldn't change), you essentially would be reducing each guy's usage 4%.  However, due to their much better efficiency than the alternative lineup - you would see a much better offensive team and Offensive Rating overall.

"I'm not sure Cadougan would fix the problems on this team. I'm not even convinced he would be better for this team than DeWil is."

BrewCity77, December 8, 2013

bilsu

The way Jamil has been playing, I would replace him with Burton.

keefe

Quote from: bilsu on March 04, 2014, 11:43:22 AM
The way Jamil has been playing, I would replace him with Burton.

No you wouldn't. We will really appreciate Jamil Wilson next year.


Death on call

jesmu84

Does using Pomeroy in this way make assumptions? For example, Burton is listed as a go-to guy, I'm guessing based on his scoring/min, but aren't you making the assumption that his pts/min would extrapolate from his current minute usage to 20-30 minutes?

PGsHeroes32

The starting lineup should be

Derrick
Todd
Jake
Jamil
Chris(extremely short leash)

Get Ox and Burton in soon. Give Dawson PT when need. Steve gets a little. Juan hopefully forgets we have a game. Try and get JJJ something.
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

GGGG

Quote from: willie warrior on March 04, 2014, 11:26:51 AM
Burton should be starting over Juan. Better scorer, shooter, rebounder and just as aggressive. Juan gets a slight nod on D, but not by much. Just another strange thing by Buzz, just like starting Otule over Gardner


I don't mind Burton starting over Juan.

But bringing offense off the bench in both Gardner and Mayo makes some sense.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

The posession% is a misguided stat. It only gives players credit for when they score, shoot, get fouled, or turn the ball over. All the "go to guy" label means for Burton is that when he gets the ball he is going to shoot (regardless of if it's a good idea or not) or turn it over.

But, I would like 30 minutes of Gardner a game, 30 minutes of Mayo, and at least 10-15 minutes of Burton a game.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


NersEllenson

Quote from: The Sultan of Slurpery on March 04, 2014, 11:53:45 AM

I don't mind Burton starting over Juan.

But bringing offense off the bench in both Gardner and Mayo makes some sense.

Agree...yet just don't see why Buzz continues to pair Derrick with such an offensively challenged lineup to start the game and halves...which if he inserted Burton into Juan's place, that would help alleviate some of the issue...and could still bring Gardner off bench..

And as pointed out...there is some merit to this point...which it would help to alleviate:

Quote from: LAMUfan on March 04, 2014, 11:16:17 AM
Burton and Gardner should not play at the same time, having Burton on the floor takes Gardner out of the offense (anyone else notice that?).  Would love to see Burton start over Juan, and play all of the time that Chris is in (about 15 min).  That would give you some scoring with the "1st team", and continue Gardner's ability to score once you take Chris out.  
"I'm not sure Cadougan would fix the problems on this team. I'm not even convinced he would be better for this team than DeWil is."

BrewCity77, December 8, 2013

AirPunches

Quote from: bilsu on March 04, 2014, 11:43:22 AM
The way Jamil has been playing, I would replace him with Burton.

I think this is the change they should make. Keep everything else the same. MU could use a scorer to open games and it would keep Jamil out of foul trouble earlier. I agree with others that burton and Gardner don't work well together. Based on body language, I don't think Gardner likes playing with burton too much.

Lennys Tap

Quote from: MARQ_13 on March 04, 2014, 02:11:49 PM
I think this is the change they should make. Keep everything else the same. MU could use a scorer to open games and it would keep Jamil out of foul trouble earlier. I agree with others that burton and Gardner don't work well together. Based on body language, I don't think Gardner likes playing with burton too much.

Davante is our best scorer and free throw shooter. And he's a very good passer. We need him to get lots of touches. When Deonte is in the ball stops with him. He's a dynamic and versatile scorer but he needs to learn to score within the offense a bit more.

MU82

Quote from: LAMUfan on March 04, 2014, 11:16:17 AM
Burton and Gardner should not play at the same time, having Burton on the floor takes Gardner out of the offense (anyone else notice that?). 

I have noticed it and commented on it in the past.

Gardner actually defers to Burton, moving out of the post so Burton can do his thing. It's interesting to watch.

If Burton learns a little more about shot selection, clock management and playing in control, he really is going to be a heck of an offensive player. His defense needs work, as is the case with most highly touted freshmen, but he gets lots of tips and steals that he can turn into fast-break buckets -- something we don't get a lot of. It's a trade-off.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

keefe

Quote from: MU82 on March 04, 2014, 02:56:06 PM
Gardner actually defers to Burton, moving out of the post so Burton can do his thing. It's interesting to watch.

So they synchronize their movements? The best athletes always do.



Death on call

jesmu84

Didn't we start DWil, JJJ, Burton, Jamil and Chris for a few games? What happened to that? I'd like to see that now for the first 4-6 minutes.

swoopem

Quote from: jesmu84 on March 04, 2014, 03:57:24 PM
Didn't we start DWil, JJJ, Burton, Jamil and Chris for a few games? What happened to that? I'd like to see that now for the first 4-6 minutes.

I'm pretty sure we got waxed by St. Johns and that was the end of that.
Bring back FFP!!!

4th and State

Quote from: swoopem on March 04, 2014, 04:38:10 PM
I'm pretty sure we got waxed by St. Johns and that was the end of that.

That game eventually got out of hand, but we did get an early lead with that lineup.  I also think it was the last game JJJ got some decent minutes.

jesmu84

#22
Quote from: swoopem on March 04, 2014, 04:38:10 PM
I'm pretty sure we got waxed by St. Johns and that was the end of that.

Not sure that it matters much, but the play-by-play shows we were up 6-0 and 8-3, before being tied 8-8 at the first TV timeout. THEN harrison proceeded to eviscerate us from 3. No idea when/who substituted into/out of the game

Probably also didn't help that from 15:34 to 7:24, we only scored 5 points...

Previous topic - Next topic