collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 7/15/25 by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[Today at 09:40:43 AM]


Open practice by Skatastrophy
[Today at 08:36:03 AM]


NM by MU Fan in Connecticut
[Today at 08:06:27 AM]


TBT by #UnleashSean
[July 18, 2025, 07:01:47 PM]


Pearson to MU by Jay Bee
[July 18, 2025, 05:17:54 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by JakeBarnes
[July 17, 2025, 10:06:35 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

Aughnanure

“All men dream; but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.” - T.E. Lawrence

Coleman

Nice breakdown. But no mention of Duane Wilson?

CAGASS24

Creighton; come on. With the success of back to back tourney appearances with wins, you'd think they could do a little better than that. I mean they're 70 spots back from the next closest big east member in the composites...

GoldenBoy16

I was thinking the same thing about Duane, but Im liking all the love about JaJuan.

GGGG

Quote from: CAGASS24 on July 10, 2013, 11:48:28 AM
Creighton; come on. With the success of back to back tourney appearances with wins, you'd think they could do a little better than that. I mean they're 70 spots back from the next closest big east member in the composites...

Creighton without the coaches kid could end up to be a bottom feeder.

Dawson Rental

Quote from: CAGASS24 on July 10, 2013, 11:48:28 AM
Creighton; come on. With the success of back to back tourney appearances with wins, you'd think they could do a little better than that. I mean they're 70 spots back from the next closest big east member in the composites...

Yet, there are some on this board that would prefer that MU have Creighton's class.  I mean they got two big men!  One's 6'9" and one's 6'10".

Look's like another year of recruiting failure by Buzz!
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

ResidentBrown

Best Defender: JaJuan Johnson

I thought I read that his defense was something he needed to work on. If his defense really is that good, to go along with his offensive prowess... watch out! We may have no need for Vander after all.

Also, not in the article but:

Best Dunker: Duane Wilson (or Deonte Burton - they both mass produce highlight slams)

Les Nessman

The SEC breakdown is laughable. It's all Kentucky, except for a few accolades.

MUMonster03

Quote from: tommyc6 on July 10, 2013, 05:50:32 PM
The SEC breakdown is laughable. It's all Kentucky, except for a few accolades.

What do you expect when they sign the top player in the nation at 4 of 5 positions and the 5th one is right up there as well? Everyone in the SEC (even the entire nation) got schooled by Kentucky in recruiting for this year. Now we will see if they can actually make a team out of that many highly rated players.

bilsu

#9
Big 12
Kansas has best recruit a 4 positions. Embid rated #2 center in country.

The Equalizer

Quote from: tommyc6 on July 10, 2013, 05:50:32 PM
The SEC breakdown is laughable. It's all Kentucky, except for a few accolades.

I don't get this comment.  I count six SEC teams other than Kentucky that are ranked ahead of our second best class in 247's team rankings:

1. SEC - UK
5. SEC - LSU
10. BE - Marquette
15. SEC - Florida
16. SEC - Missouri
21. SEC - Arkansas
22. SEC - So. Carolina
26. SEC - Alabama
29. BE - Villanova
38. SEC - Tennessee
43. BE - Providence
49. BE - DePaul
53. BE - Xavier

55. SEC - Texas A&M
57. BE - Butler
59. SEC - Vanderbilt
55. SEC - Georgia
71. BE - St. Johns
74. SEC - Ole Miss
78. SEC - Auburn
86. BE - Seton Hall
97. SEC - MSU
151 BE - Creighton.

Obviously team performance is based on multiple classes of players--but for anyone to say that the 2013 SEC recruiting was "laughable" either can't be comparing them to the Big East, or they think that Big East recruiting is even more laughable.

Coleman

Quote from: The Equalizer on July 11, 2013, 09:25:33 AM
I don't get this comment.  I count six SEC teams other than Kentucky that are ranked ahead of our second best class in 247's team rankings:

1. SEC - UK
5. SEC - LSU
10. BE - Marquette
15. SEC - Florida
16. SEC - Missouri
21. SEC - Arkansas
22. SEC - So. Carolina
26. SEC - Alabama
29. BE - Villanova
38. SEC - Tennessee
43. BE - Providence
49. BE - DePaul
53. BE - Xavier

55. SEC - Texas A&M
57. BE - Butler
59. SEC - Vanderbilt
55. SEC - Georgia
71. BE - St. Johns
74. SEC - Ole Miss
78. SEC - Auburn
86. BE - Seton Hall
97. SEC - MSU
151 BE - Creighton.

Obviously team performance is based on multiple classes of players--but for anyone to say that the 2013 SEC recruiting was "laughable" either can't be comparing them to the Big East, or they think that Big East recruiting is even more laughable.

I think that was his point. It was laughable that Kentucky got all the accolades in that article when the rest of the conference had a very good year recruiting.

Aughnanure

Quote from: The Equalizer on July 11, 2013, 09:25:33 AM
I don't get this comment.  I count six SEC teams other than Kentucky that are ranked ahead of our second best class in 247's team rankings:

1. SEC - UK
5. SEC - LSU
10. BE - Marquette
15. SEC - Florida
16. SEC - Missouri
21. SEC - Arkansas
22. SEC - So. Carolina
26. SEC - Alabama
29. BE - Villanova
38. SEC - Tennessee
43. BE - Providence
49. BE - DePaul
53. BE - Xavier

55. SEC - Texas A&M
57. BE - Butler
59. SEC - Vanderbilt
55. SEC - Georgia
71. BE - St. Johns
74. SEC - Ole Miss
78. SEC - Auburn
86. BE - Seton Hall
97. SEC - MSU
151 BE - Creighton.

Obviously team performance is based on multiple classes of players--but for anyone to say that the 2013 SEC recruiting was "laughable" either can't be comparing them to the Big East, or they think that Big East recruiting is even more laughable.

Jesus Creighton. I know that class had probably committed before the Big East, but still. Yikes.
“All men dream; but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.” - T.E. Lawrence

Les Nessman

Quote from: Bleuteaux on July 11, 2013, 09:43:28 AM
I think that was his point. It was laughable that Kentucky got all the accolades in that article when the rest of the conference had a very good year recruiting.

Thank you. That was my point exactly. Kentucky's recruiting was so good that they have, for each position, the number one recruit in the conference coming in this year. That is insane.



willie warrior

I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind. Rick Pitino: "You can either complain or adapt."

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Don't sleep on Creighton quite yet. They have had years of success (by success I mean MVC success) with these kinds of recruiting classes. They only had three scholarships to give this year. And the gems of their class are JUCOs who we should know better than anyone are consistently underranked.

Give them some time to recruit with the bonus of being in the BEast and they will be a decent team. Yes they will suck next year after McDermott leaves, but they will be back in a few years.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


wiscwarrior


Aughnanure

Quote from: Analytical Eagle on July 11, 2013, 11:38:58 AM
Don't sleep on Creighton quite yet. They have had years of success (by success I mean MVC success) with these kinds of recruiting classes. They only had three scholarships to give this year. And the gems of their class are JUCOs who we should know better than anyone are consistently underranked.

Give them some time to recruit with the bonus of being in the BEast and they will be a decent team. Yes they will suck next year after McDermott leaves, but they will be back in a few years.

Their main problem is going to be the reality that Greg McDermott is not Dana Altman.
“All men dream; but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.” - T.E. Lawrence

damuts222

QuoteDon't sleep on Creighton quite yet. They have had years of success (by success I mean MVC success) with these kinds of recruiting classes. They only had three scholarships to give this year. And the gems of their class are JUCOs who we should know better than anyone are consistently underranked.

Give them some time to recruit with the bonus of being in the BEast and they will be a decent team. Yes they will suck next year after McDermott leaves, but they will be back in a few years.

That's exactly the problem, the NEW Big East doesn't have a couple years.  The precedent has to be set quickly that the Big East is a conference to be reckoned with in basketball, consistently getting 44-5 teams in the dance.  Also I wouldn't be surprised to see McDermott's father leave for greener pastures after his son graduates leaving Creighton in a bad spot.
Twitta Tracka of the Year Award Recipient 2016

The Equalizer

#21
Quote from: tommyc6 on July 11, 2013, 10:04:53 AM
Thank you. That was my point exactly. Kentucky's recruiting was so good that they have, for each position, the number one recruit in the conference coming in this year. That is insane.

Sorry--thought the implication was that rest of the league's recruting is a joke, as in not up to the Big East standards.

I've read enough comments here that put down the SEC, B12 and P12, implying that aside from UK or Kansas or Arizona, those leagues have nobody worthwhile, and will likely be ranked behind the new Big East.

Les Nessman

Quote from: The Equalizer on July 11, 2013, 09:13:08 PM
Sorry--thought the implication was that rest of the league's recruting is a joke, as in not up to the Big East standards.

I've read enough comments here that put down the SEC, B12 and P12, implying that aside from UK or Kansas or Arizona, those leagues have nobody worthwhile, and will likely be ranked behind the new Big East.


Not a problem.

Aughnanure

Quote from: The Equalizer on July 11, 2013, 09:13:08 PM
Sorry--thought the implication was that rest of the league's recruting is a joke, as in not up to the Big East standards.

I've read enough comments here that put down the SEC, B12 and P12, implying that aside from UK or Kansas or Arizona, those leagues have nobody worthwhile, and will likely be ranked behind the new Big East.



While I kind of agree with you, the Pac-12 deserves its reputation. The Big XII has solid but unspectacular quality, only one star (they really missed out on Louisville), but not a ton of awful teams (TTech, TCU). SEC has a bunch of garbage teams, but they also have 14 total so they should have more bottom feeders. They're much deeper that people give them credit for. If most of Tennessee, Vanderbilt, Arkansas, LSU and Missouri can get rolling their top half will rival any league.
“All men dream; but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.” - T.E. Lawrence

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: damuts222 on July 11, 2013, 12:24:50 PM
That's exactly the problem, the NEW Big East doesn't have a couple years.  The precedent has to be set quickly that the Big East is a conference to be reckoned with in basketball, consistently getting 44-5 teams in the dance.  Also I wouldn't be surprised to see McDermott's father leave for greener pastures after his son graduates leaving Creighton in a bad spot.

True, but we don't need Creighton to be one of those 4-5 teams in the coming years. Marquette, Georgetown, and Villanova should be good to get in the tourney every year. St. John's is on a huge upswing this year, Providence is on the up and up, Butler will be down next season but should be up again in a year or two, and Xavier was the most dominant midmajor outside of Gonzaga. When Creighton falls, some collection of these teams will rise to take their place.

Also, we will probably expand in the next year or two. On one hand, that will raise expectations to 5-6 teams a year, but on the other hand, those teams could be VCU and Gonzaga.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


Previous topic - Next topic