collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

2025-26 Schedule by Mr. Nielsen
[September 13, 2025, 09:57:00 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

Otule's Glass Eye

#50
From what I have read we have Cohen all but locked up, and we are in good standing with Harris. Cohen is a likely consensus top 100, and Harris is on the rise and around the top 100. I would be happy landing two borderline top 100 players along with a possibly another player or two. Who knows, maybe Cohen and Harris will both shoot up in the rankings just as our 2013 recruits did and be around the top 50. However, I would still be very disappointed if we failed to land either Looney (already lost him) or Stone (if KW's sources are correct,  ::) ). Buzz has done a great job turning unheralded guys into stars, and we have seen plenty of success the past few years, but getting a 5 star top 10 player such as Looney or Stone would likely push us over the top and into Final Four territory. This year's team looks very solid again and has the potential to climb into the top 10, and I expect nothing less than another Sweet Sixteen. Part of the reason I was mad at Vander for leaving was due to the fact that with him we are a top 10 preseason team with a very good chance at a Final Four. It's his decision in the end, so I can't fault him for making it. Getting to a F4 would make more 5 stars look at us, no matter what conference we are in.

MtAiryGoldenEagle

http://insider.espn.go.com/college-sports/recruiting/basketball/mens/story/_/id/9420472/2014-big-east-basketball-recruiting-primer

Marquette Golden Eagles
Who they have: No 2014 recruits so far.

"Who they want: The 2013 class brought Marquette's backcourt of the future, with three ESPN 100 prospects in Duane Wilson, JaJuan Johnson and Deonte Burton, so conventional wisdom is that the Eagles would focus on their interior spots in 2014. While they could certainly use a true big man, the reality is that their 2013 class is filled with enough versatility to allow them to add the best available prospects in 2014. Shooting guard Ahmed Hill falls under that best-available category, while centers Sean O'Mara and Johnathon Wilkins would both help out up front.

Storyline to watch: Head coach Buzz Williams himself is the story, and specifically his growing reputation among recruits as someone they want to play for. If he can capitalize and deliver another strong class, it will be just the latest step in Marquette's budding national momentum.

Bold prediction: Don't be surprised to see two ESPN 100-caliber additions join the Eagles in 2014, one along the front line and another versatile wing.

Overall recruiting trend: Up. The "Buzz" is all positive about Williams these days, and recruits are taking notice. The 2013 class was his best since taking over at Marquette, and he shows no signs of slowing down in 2014."

According to Adam Finkelstein, all of the Big East teams are doing pretty well recruiting.

GGGG

Nice article MtAiry....

Remember the default mode for most Scoopers is somewhere between "mind-numbing worry" and "hysterical panic."

Golden Avalanche

Quote from: keefe on June 26, 2013, 12:07:17 PM
Though better than Marquette over the past 20 years

That's like a Japanese lager bomb.

Canned Goods n Ammo

Quote from: MtAiryGoldenEagle on June 26, 2013, 03:18:06 PM

According to Adam Finkelstein, all of the Big East teams are doing pretty well recruiting.


Pfttt. I'll stick with KW's sources, thank you very much.


keefe

Quote from: Golden Avalanche on June 26, 2013, 03:35:39 PM
That's like a Japanese lager bomb.

Perhaps after you have lived in both Japan and Germany, speak either language and have first hand knowledge of their respective lagers then perhaps you can have some meaningful perspective from which to be so dismissive.



Death on call

tower912

But MU managed to land another 4 star forward.   Just imagine what MU could do in a land of pink ponies where there was no shifting conference landscapes. 
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

ChicosBailBonds

Quote from: keefe on June 26, 2013, 01:26:16 PM
Since Roy Williams and Bill Self have registered similar records in Big 12 play at KU one could argue thusly about the weakness of that conference too. 


I don't think so, because KU has proven it out of conference as well as other areas more consistently than Gonzaga has.  Plus, other schools in the Big12 have done very well, whereas it is hard to envision anyone other than perhaps St. Mary's being of any quality in the WCC for most of those years Gonzaga has dominated.  I realize BYU is now part of the conference, but that is a very recent undertaking.

We really shouldn't be comparing KU's domination in the Big 12 to what Gonzaga has done.  Strength of schedule so much different, various successes by Texas, Texas A&M (when they were in the league), Oklahoma State, Oklahoma, Baylor, Missouri, Kansas State, Iowa State....it just doesn't come close to comparing to USD, St. Mary's, LMU, Pepperdine, Portland, Santa Clara, USF and BYU (just the last few years).  Night and day IMO.

MuMark


Harris is well inside the top 100 now....Scout just updated and he came in at 76 and Bossi just said he will be inside the top 75 when Rivals updates tomorrow.

Quote from: MUFanatic4Life on June 26, 2013, 03:08:21 PM
From what I have read we have Cohen all but locked up, and we are in good standing with Harris. Cohen is a likely consensus top 100, and Harris is on the rise and around the top 100. I would be happy landing two borderline top 100 players along with a possibly another player or two. Who knows, maybe Cohen and Harris will both shoot up in the rankings just as our 2013 recruits did and be around the top 50. However, I would still be very disappointed if we failed to land either Looney (already lost him) or Stone (if KW's sources are correct,  ::) ). Buzz has done a great job turning unheralded guys into stars, and we have seen plenty of success the past few years, but getting a 5 star top 10 player such as Looney or Stone would likely push us over the top and into Final Four territory. This year's team looks very solid again and has the potential to climb into the top 10, and I expect nothing less than another Sweet Sixteen. Part of the reason I was mad at Vander for leaving was due to the fact that with him we are a top 10 preseason team with a very good chance at a Final Four. It's his decision in the end, so I can't fault him for making it. Getting to a F4 would make more 5 stars look at us, no matter what conference we are in.

Groin_pull

Quote from: MUFanatic4Life on June 26, 2013, 03:08:21 PM
From what I have read we have Cohen all but locked up, and we are in good standing with Harris. Cohen is a likely consensus top 100, and Harris is on the rise and around the top 100. I would be happy landing two borderline top 100 players along with a possibly another player or two. Who knows, maybe Cohen and Harris will both shoot up in the rankings just as our 2013 recruits did and be around the top 50. However, I would still be very disappointed if we failed to land either Looney (already lost him) or Stone (if KW's sources are correct,  ::) ). Buzz has done a great job turning unheralded guys into stars, and we have seen plenty of success the past few years, but getting a 5 star top 10 player such as Looney or Stone would likely push us over the top and into Final Four territory. This year's team looks very solid again and has the potential to climb into the top 10, and I expect nothing less than another Sweet Sixteen. Part of the reason I was mad at Vander for leaving was due to the fact that with him we are a top 10 preseason team with a very good chance at a Final Four. It's his decision in the end, so I can't fault him for making it. Getting to a F4 would make more 5 stars look at us, no matter what conference we are in.

There are no "must-get" recruits. No single player will make or break MU's program. MU isn't getting Looney...and they may not land Stone. But guess what? Buzz will find talented, capable players who want to be at MU. Getting all worked up over one player is only a recipe for heartache.

keefe

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on June 26, 2013, 06:35:47 PM

I don't think so, because KU has proven it out of conference as well as other areas more consistently than Gonzaga has.  Plus, other schools in the Big12 have done very well, whereas it is hard to envision anyone other than perhaps St. Mary's being of any quality in the WCC for most of those years Gonzaga has dominated.  I realize BYU is now part of the conference, but that is a very recent undertaking.

We really shouldn't be comparing KU's domination in the Big 12 to what Gonzaga has done.  Strength of schedule so much different, various successes by Texas, Texas A&M (when they were in the league), Oklahoma State, Oklahoma, Baylor, Missouri, Kansas State, Iowa State....it just doesn't come close to comparing to USD, St. Mary's, LMU, Pepperdine, Portland, Santa Clara, USF and BYU (just the last few years).  Night and day IMO.

Well, it's all moot once Gonzaga joins the Big East!


Death on call

Mr. Nielsen

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on June 26, 2013, 10:04:20 AM
Oh, they know.  Very much so.
They might think they know. Right now they are hearing about the bad PR of "The Big East is over as we know it". I must have heard it over 100 times on TV.
If we are all thinking alike, we're not thinking at all. It's OK to disagree. Just don't be disagreeable.
-Bill Walton

ChicosBailBonds

Quote from: mupanther on June 26, 2013, 07:18:09 PM
They might think they know. Right now they are hearing about the bad PR of "The Big East is over as we know it". I must have heard it over 100 times on TV.

The new conference is going to take a few years to earn some cred, that's just a way of life.  Some good coaches, good programs with recent quality success will continue to help in the short run.  Yes, there will be those out there that will negatively recruit against the conference, that's a way of life.  I'm not too worried about the recruiting, quite frankly.  I do believe the original statement that recruits don't know about conferences is silly....they definitely do in hoops, hockey, baseball, football and many other sports as well. 

Mr. Nielsen

Quote from: icheights on June 26, 2013, 11:24:21 AM
If you believe kids don't recognize what conference a school is in and what competition it will bring then you are just plain ignorant.  


They can name the heavyweights. Most would say about the ACC, Duke & UNC and struggle with the rest.
If we are all thinking alike, we're not thinking at all. It's OK to disagree. Just don't be disagreeable.
-Bill Walton

Mr. Nielsen

#64
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on June 26, 2013, 07:21:19 PM
The new conference is going to take a few years to earn some cred, that's just a way of life.  Some good coaches, good programs with recent quality success will continue to help in the short run.  Yes, there will be those out there that will negatively recruit against the conference, that's a way of life.  I'm not too worried about the recruiting, quite frankly.  I do believe the original statement that recruits don't know about conferences is silly....they definitely do in hoops, hockey, baseball, football and many other sports as well.  
Correct! This will pass, once the football season starts and the American Conference (AAC) gets playing.

Great to hear MU & Nova got nice pick ups for 2014!

If we are all thinking alike, we're not thinking at all. It's OK to disagree. Just don't be disagreeable.
-Bill Walton

wadesworld

Quote from: KenoshaWarrior on June 26, 2013, 11:24:29 AM
Im okay with it, but if 5 star players are going to look at UW over Marquette because of a conference than I think we are in trouble

Yeah we might start losing out on all the 5 star recruits we've so commonly picked up.

Oh wait...

Aughnanure

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on June 26, 2013, 06:35:47 PM

I don't think so, because KU has proven it out of conference as well as other areas more consistently than Gonzaga has.  Plus, other schools in the Big12 have done very well, whereas it is hard to envision anyone other than perhaps St. Mary's being of any quality in the WCC for most of those years Gonzaga has dominated.  I realize BYU is now part of the conference, but that is a very recent undertaking.

We really shouldn't be comparing KU's domination in the Big 12 to what Gonzaga has done.  Strength of schedule so much different, various successes by Texas, Texas A&M (when they were in the league), Oklahoma State, Oklahoma, Baylor, Missouri, Kansas State, Iowa State....it just doesn't come close to comparing to USD, St. Mary's, LMU, Pepperdine, Portland, Santa Clara, USF and BYU (just the last few years).  Night and day IMO.

Yeah. I mean, the Big XII really has kinda been a mediocre and sometimes overrated conference (a reason, I have always thought, to why KU has had trouble in the tourney under both Self and Williams - not soo much anymore)  but come on. The WCC is such a poor conference (unfortunately). And BYU is what, only 2 years in?
“All men dream; but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.” - T.E. Lawrence

Atticus

Im not a recruitnik because the transfer rate is so high and it's tough for me to get excited about every single recruit. That said, if this conference is off to a bad start, can anybody tell me how Pitt, UConn, UL, and Cuse are doing now that they are in new conferences?  If the ACC has become such a huge draw, are their top schools doing even better....? Too early to tell?


KenoshaWarrior

#68
Quote from: keefe on June 26, 2013, 12:07:17 PM
Though better than Marquette over the past 20 years
Disagree.  Marquette has  a final 4.  Tied with Gonzaga for Elite 8 appearances.

We are a bigger draw than Gonzaga.

Gonzaga lived off it's 1999 tourney run, and it's goofy name that was able to sell a ton of jerseys

bilsu

Quote from: tower912 on June 26, 2013, 06:16:54 PM
But MU managed to land another 4 star forward.   Just imagine what MU could do in a land of pink ponies where there was no shifting conference landscapes. 
Change MU to Buzz and your statement would be correct.

Silkk the Shaka

So getting back to the topic of the thread.  We have gotten 2 commits since the announcement of the new conference.  One a top 75 SF/PF, the other a top 60 PG/2G.  We're 2/2.  No evidence whatsoever that the conference is hurting recruiting, except the evidence that exists in badger fans' fantasies.

Pakuni

Quote from: Jajuannaman on June 27, 2013, 08:52:27 AM
So getting back to the topic of the thread.  We have gotten 2 commits since the announcement of the new conference.  One a top 75 SF/PF, the other a top 60 PG/2G.  We're 2/2.  No evidence whatsoever that the conference is hurting recruiting, except the evidence that exists in badger fans' fantasies and sky-is-falling Scoopers.

Fixed.


The Equalizer

Quote from: Atticus on June 27, 2013, 02:20:36 AM
Im not a recruitnik because the transfer rate is so high and it's tough for me to get excited about every single recruit. That said, if this conference is off to a bad start, can anybody tell me how Pitt, UConn, UL, and Cuse are doing now that they are in new conferences?  If the ACC has become such a huge draw, are their top schools doing even better....? Too early to tell?


21 of the top 50 (using ESPN's list) have made commitments.  Only 1 to the new Big East (#47 Issac Copeland)

Of the teams you called out:
--UL landed ESPN #22 JaQuan Lyle, #28 Quentin Snyder and #53 Shaqquan Aaron
--SU landed ESPN #7 Chris McCullough
--UConn (not going to the ACC) has landed ESPN #17 Daniel Hamilton.
--Pitt has no ESPN top 100 recruits yet. 

As an aside, the team that seems to be leveraging its new conference situation is Maryland.  They have top top 50 2014 commits.

Pakuni

#74
Quote from: The Equalizer on June 27, 2013, 10:46:21 AM
21 of the top 50 (using ESPN's list) have made commitments.  Only 1 to the new Big East (#47 Issac Copeland)

Of the teams you called out:
--UL landed ESPN #22 JaQuan Lyle, #28 Quentin Snyder and #53 Shaqquan Aaron
--SU landed ESPN #7 Chris McCullough
--UConn (not going to the ACC) has landed ESPN #17 Daniel Hamilton.
--Pitt has no ESPN top 100 recruits yet.  

As an aside, the team that seems to be leveraging its new conference situation is Maryland.  They have top top 50 2014 commits.


Maryland's been strong on the recruiting trail since hiring Turgeon. He landed Alex Len just after getting the job and landed a couple top 100 players (including #30 overall) in the class of 2012. Also, they were a close second to Kentucky for the Harrison twins.

Previous topic - Next topic