collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 7/15/25 by MuMark
[Today at 04:24:22 PM]


Pearson to MU by tower912
[Today at 03:45:05 PM]


Marquette freshmen at Goolsby's 7/12 by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[Today at 11:18:55 AM]


Marquette NBA Thread by MuggsyB
[Today at 08:06:27 AM]


Nash Walker commits to MU by Captain Quette
[July 11, 2025, 02:40:11 PM]


Congrats to Royce by tower912
[July 10, 2025, 09:00:17 PM]


Kam update by seakm4
[July 10, 2025, 07:40:03 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

frozena pizza

Quote from: Avenue Commons on May 18, 2013, 10:47:25 PM
Look at some of these mocks. If you we're an NBA GM, would you risk your career on Vander or a 5'10" Shane Larkin? Vander by far.

Show me one guy Larkin's size in the league. Nate Robinson is only 5'8", but he's all muscle and as wide as he is short and tough as nails.

Ty Lawson.  More muscular than Larkin but pretty comparable in size.  

Canned Goods n Ammo

Maybe we have been looking at this wrong.

What appreciable skill(s) would Vander have to display to be a 1st rounder?

Better shooting? OK
Better distribution? OK.

Everything else, he's already pretty good at, and he's arguably ok at the 2 things listed above.

I guess if a GM thinks Vander can improve his shooting, he's worth at least a second round pick. He should be able to defend both guard positions, and provide nice role-player minutes. If he develops a decent 3pter, he'll be a rotational player. If he doesn't, he'll be in the d-league.

I guess he should def. be a second rounder.


forgetful

Quote from: Guns n Ammo on May 21, 2013, 04:59:49 PM
Maybe we have been looking at this wrong.

What appreciable skill(s) would Vander have to display to be a 1st rounder?

Better shooting? OK
Better distribution? OK.

Everything else, he's already pretty good at, and he's arguably ok at the 2 things listed above.

I guess if a GM thinks Vander can improve his shooting, he's worth at least a second round pick. He should be able to defend both guard positions, and provide nice role-player minutes. If he develops a decent 3pter, he'll be a rotational player. If he doesn't, he'll be in the d-league.

I guess he should def. be a second rounder.



What evidence do we have of Vander being a good distributor.  His 1.8 assists per game (2.3 turnovers) last year is not really indicative of being even arguably ok given that he intends on playing point.

Avenue Commons

Quote from: frozena pizza on May 21, 2013, 04:46:22 PM
Ty Lawson.  More muscular than Larkin but pretty comparable in size.  

Lawson is listed as 5'11" and 195 lbs. Larkin is 170 lbs. Larkin apparently had freakish numbers at the combine, though. Still think he'll get beat up in league.
We Are Marquette

jficke13

Quote from: forgetful on May 21, 2013, 06:42:55 PM
What evidence do we have of Vander being a good distributor.  His 1.8 assists per game (2.3 turnovers) last year is not really indicative of being even arguably ok given that he intends on playing point.

Vander's assist/turnover #s don't mean anything from a year he was relied upon to be a primary scorer. He didn't play pg and he was counted on having a high offensive usage, that = low assists and might skew turnovers up in situations he's trying to force scoring when nobody else is.

MuMark

How successful could his day have been for him to drop out of all the mocks?

keefe

Quote from: RawdogDX on May 18, 2013, 02:31:50 PM
Last year tony wroten went 25th over all after hitting on 16% of his threes.  It could happen.
http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/player/washington/tony-wroten


Wroten is the real deal. Not only was he 1st Team Pac 12 & Pac 12 Freshman of the Year but his bloodlines are impeccable. His parents were stars at U Dub, with his father playing for the Bucs as a TE. Mother and aunt were both All Americans. His cousin is Nate Robinson. Wroten struggled from deep but he averaged 17/5/3 in his one season at U Dub.


Death on call

forgetful

Quote from: lawwarrior12 on May 21, 2013, 08:07:07 PM
Vander's assist/turnover #s don't mean anything from a year he was relied upon to be a primary scorer. He didn't play pg and he was counted on having a high offensive usage, that = low assists and might skew turnovers up in situations he's trying to force scoring when nobody else is.

Understood, but that means we have 0 evidence of his being able to distribute at even a passable level, which was my point.

As others have noted Jerel McNeal put up 20 pts per game and 4 assists his senior year and people questioned his ability to distribute well enough to play point.  Vander's numbers in a similar offensive role were significantly worse. 

Again I wish the kid the best, and think he has the potential to be a good player in the league, but he really needs someone to bite on potential, the stats don't support a draft pick at this point.

MU82

Vander will have to wow a team in workouts to demonstrate he can be even a passable point guard. At MU, he rarely if ever displayed PG skills and intangibles: penetrate and kick; distribute on break; make teammates better; organize the offense; beat pressure in the backcourt; court sense; great ballhandling; etc. That's not his fault because that's not how he was used, but it is a fact.

It would be a real leap of faith for a team at the highest level of basketball to look at Vander's body of work and say: "Of course he can be an NBA point guard."

Still, as many have said, all it takes is one team. One only needs to look at some of the horrible players drafted in the first round over the years to say, "Hey, Vander's better this year than they were in their years."
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

keefe



Death on call

Canned Goods n Ammo

Quote from: forgetful on May 21, 2013, 06:42:55 PM
What evidence do we have of Vander being a good distributor.  His 1.8 assists per game (2.3 turnovers) last year is not really indicative of being even arguably ok given that he intends on playing point.

It's a fair point.

I don't really have a statistic to back up my claim that he is an "ok" distributor.

I'm really just using the eye test. The kid isn't Magic Johnson, but he's also not a black hole either. Also, I think if MU had a knock-down 3pt shooter on the wing, Vander's (and Junior's) assist numbers would look better. How many times did MU drive and kick the ball to a guy who either missed the jumpshot, or didn't even take the jumpshot?

I think he might be good enough to be a combo guard off of the bench. Still a longshot, but I'm coming around to the idea.


lurch91

Bleacher Report has Vander going with the 53 pick in the draft (second round) to the Indianapolis Pacers.

Lennys Tap

Where was I when the New Orleans Hornets became the Pelicans?

GGGG

Quote from: Lennys Tap on May 22, 2013, 03:04:05 PM
Where was I when the New Orleans Hornets became the Pelicans?


Officially?  A couple months ago.  Rumors came out late last year.

MuMark

Seth Davis ‏@SethDavisHoops  3h 
Vander Blue playing some point but doesn't look natural. It's why he should have gone back to Marquette for one more year

Jonathan Givony ‏@DraftExpress  3h 
Lots of everything from Vander Blue today. Made tough shots, also made some very poor decisions. Great athlete. All in all a solid showing.


RawdogDX

Quote from: keefe on May 21, 2013, 09:26:14 PM
Wroten is the real deal. Not only was he 1st Team Pac 12 & Pac 12 Freshman of the Year but his bloodlines are impeccable. His parents were stars at U Dub, with his father playing for the Bucs as a TE. Mother and aunt were both All Americans. His cousin is Nate Robinson. Wroten struggled from deep but he averaged 17/5/3 in his one season at U Dub.

Wow.  Moomoo bashed me for mentioning high school rankings as a potential factor in a draft and you are going with extended family.

Previous topic - Next topic