collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Nash Walker commits to MU by tower912
[Today at 05:44:02 PM]


Recruiting as of 7/15/25 by JTJ3
[Today at 03:31:05 PM]


More conference realignment talk by WhiteTrash
[Today at 12:16:36 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by Shaka Shart
[Today at 01:36:32 AM]


Marquette freshmen at Goolsby's 7/12 by BCHoopster
[July 09, 2025, 10:13:46 PM]


Kam update by MuggsyB
[July 09, 2025, 02:51:24 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

The Equalizer

Quote from: Goose on May 01, 2013, 03:49:34 PM
Chico's


I said on here months ago that I heard Vander was going pro this year regardless of his performance. Person that told me this I trust a great deal and he stated that was common knowledge within the program. Love Buzz big time, but he is sly guy. Expectations were probably at very high level for next year and this helps put the chip on the shoulder back into play. He might have known Blue was going but like everyone on here believe it is mistake. I stood steady on Blue leaving for months yet I was hoping he would hang around.

Given what we heard about Todd Mayo's non-relationship with Buzz last year, I don't completely buy in to the fact that Buzz knew about Vander's plans.

Perhaps he heard that Vander was thinking about leaving early, but the surprise came from the fact that he actually did it--in the interviews it comes across as  news to him.

Coleman

Been thinking about this a lot lately. Vander will go in the 2nd round. I hated to see him leave, but this was the right choice for him.

Aughnanure

Quote from: Terror Skink on May 02, 2013, 07:40:38 AM

DJO had a terrible handle.  Dribbled way too high.  He was a better finisher, but Vander made leaps and bounds in that area over the past year.

Never been impressed w/ Vander's either.
“All men dream; but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.” - T.E. Lawrence

ChicosBailBonds

Quote from: Victor McCormick on May 02, 2013, 08:57:49 AM
Been thinking about this a lot lately. Vander will go in the 2nd round. I hated to see him leave, but this was the right choice for him.

If he would have gone in 1st round next year with guaranteed money, different answer.  We'll never know.

mu-rara

I don't think htis will work out well for VB, but if he was mentally checked out of school, it is for the best.

BM1090

Quote from: Aughnanure on May 01, 2013, 10:42:07 PM
What are you talking about? You seem to have a very short and selective memory about Vander. Do you have no memory of the many times DJO drove, stopped, and made a fade-away jumper to halt a run?

DJO scored much more points, shot the ball more, had a better effective FG%, True shooting %, player efficiency rating, 3 point %, and in all but 1 year a better FG% (by .07%). In Vander's best year, his efficiency doesn't come close to DJO's worst.

To clarify, I meant that Vander's mid range game from his JR year was better than DJO's. If we are comparing careers then yes, DJO's was significantly better. DJO was also a much better three point shooter.

Coleman

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on May 02, 2013, 09:15:34 AM
If he would have gone in 1st round next year with guaranteed money, different answer.  We'll never know.

Agreed, but what if he fell off or had an injury next year, and went undrafted after next year? He is striking while the iron is hot and you can't fault him for that.

Skatastrophy

Quote from: The Equalizer on May 02, 2013, 08:55:39 AM
Given what we heard about Todd Mayo's non-relationship with Buzz last year, I don't completely buy in to the fact that Buzz knew about Vander's plans.

Perhaps he heard that Vander was thinking about leaving early, but the surprise came from the fact that he actually did it--in the interviews it comes across as  news to him.

That's hard for me to believe.  Everyone knew that Vander's only goal was to go pro as quickly as possible.  If I knew that, the coaching staff knew it.

Aughnanure

Quote from: Victor McCormick on May 02, 2013, 10:49:50 AM
Agreed, but what if he fell off or had an injury next year, and went undrafted after next year? He is striking while the iron is hot and you can't fault him for that.

I think the larger point is that the iron is not as hot as he and some here believe it is.
“All men dream; but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.” - T.E. Lawrence

Hards Alumni

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on May 02, 2013, 09:15:34 AM
If he would have gone in 1st round next year with guaranteed money, different answer.  We'll never know.

You're right we'll never know.  But the odds seem better that he will get drafted this year.

swoopem

Quote from: Victor McCormick on May 02, 2013, 10:49:50 AM
Agreed, but what if he fell off or had an injury next year, and went undrafted after next year? He is striking while the iron is hot and you can't fault him for that.

I can fault him because I want my National Championship. Kind of like how Bud Kilmer wants his district title in Varsity Blues
Bring back FFP!!!

ChicosBailBonds

#36
Quote from: Victor McCormick on May 02, 2013, 10:49:50 AM
Agreed, but what if he fell off or had an injury next year, and went undrafted after next year? He is striking while the iron is hot and you can't fault him for that.

Yup.  Though I would argue he's striking while HE thinks the iron is hot, whether the market place does (the teams), remains to be seen.  Always risk and reward with decisions in life, this is just at an elevated scale than 99% of the public has to go through.  Hope it works out for him.

Aughnanure

Quote from: MUEagle1090 on May 02, 2013, 10:32:43 AM
To clarify, I meant that Vander's mid range game from his JR year was better than DJO's. If we are comparing careers then yes, DJO's was significantly better. DJO was also a much better three point shooter.

But it wasn't. Ever.
“All men dream; but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.” - T.E. Lawrence

WarriorFan

It's tough to compare DJO and VB for NBA potential, simply because DJO is 6'1 maybe and VB is a long 6'4.  DJO definitely had and has more skills, but the height could make the difference for Vander. 
"The meaning of life isn't gnashing our bicuspids over what comes after death but tasting the tiny moments that come before it."

GGGG

Quote from: Aughnanure on May 04, 2013, 10:19:01 AM
But it wasn't. Ever.


Vander Blue's 2 pt. FG% last year was 14 points higher than DJO's his last season.

Vander's mid range game was clearly better than DJO's last year.

GGGG

Quote from: jtbh6b1 on May 04, 2013, 07:09:07 PM
It's tough to compare DJO and VB for NBA potential, simply because DJO is 6'1 maybe and VB is a long 6'4.  DJO definitely had and has more skills, but the height could make the difference for Vander. 


Skills?  DJO could do one thing better than Vander - long range shooting.  That's about it.

MUSF

Quote from: Terror Skink on May 04, 2013, 07:17:49 PM

Skills?  DJO could do one thing better than Vander - long range shooting.  That's about it.

Yup.

I'm surprised how many people here think DJO was a better pro prospect than Vander. I think it's Vander and I don't think it's that close.

GGGG

Quote from: MUSF on May 04, 2013, 08:16:15 PM
Yup.

I'm surprised how many people here think DJO was a better pro prospect than Vander. I think it's Vander and I don't think it's that close.


Half this board thinks the only thing that makes a player worthwhile is scoring.

MUSF

Quote from: Terror Skink on May 04, 2013, 08:21:37 PM

Half this board thinks the only thing that makes a player worthwhile is scoring.

Yeah, I love it when we start playing the stat comparison game to figure out who the better pro prospect is.

mu_hilltopper

Quote from: Terror Skink on May 04, 2013, 07:16:50 PM

Vander Blue's 2 pt. FG% last year was 14 points higher than DJO's his last season.

Vander's mid range game was clearly better than DJO's last year.

Where are you getting those numbers?  Statsheet has FG and 3FG, so I computed 2FG%.

Vander's junior year vs. DJO's Senior year 2fg%:
Vander: 52.8% .. DJO 49.3%. 

Both numbers are great, but separated by 3.5, not 14 points. 

77ncaachamps

Quote from: Terror Skink on May 02, 2013, 07:41:27 AM

???  No NBA team wants him.

I know he's in Russia, but those were my sentiments before he was drafted.
I still think he'll return to the League someday.

Like I posted earlier, DJO's ceiling seemed limited (compared to Vander's). NBA teams want to see some ceiling in their investment.
SS Marquette

GGGG

Quote from: mu_hilltopper on May 05, 2013, 09:35:45 AM
Where are you getting those numbers?  Statsheet has FG and 3FG, so I computed 2FG%.

Vander's junior year vs. DJO's Senior year 2fg%:
Vander: 52.8% .. DJO 49.3%. 

Both numbers are great, but separated by 3.5, not 14 points. 


You are correct.  I looked at the wrong number for DJO.

GGGG

Quote from: 77ncaachamps on May 05, 2013, 09:41:01 AM
I know he's in Russia, but those were my sentiments before he was drafted.
I still think he'll return to the League someday.

Like I posted earlier, DJO's ceiling seemed limited (compared to Vander's). NBA teams want to see some ceiling in their investment.


Unless DJO can significantly improve his outside shot, I just don't see it.

I think Buycks makes the NBA before DJO does.

Dish

The more I think about this and analyze it, I think Vander winds up a first round pick. Might not be totally apples/apples, but I think teams will look at Vander and see Iman Shumpert (ironically). I think the more success Shumpert has in the playoffs, helps Vander's stock rise (even though they are mutually exclusive).

Dish

Mea Culpa, I didn't see Sultan's thread on the Vander/Shumpert comparison until now, my bad.

Previous topic - Next topic