collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

25 YEARS OF THE AP TOP 25 by Galway Eagle
[July 05, 2025, 09:04:08 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by TAMU, Knower of Ball
[July 05, 2025, 08:30:08 PM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by DoctorV
[July 05, 2025, 01:45:54 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by Billy Hoyle
[July 04, 2025, 09:32:02 PM]


More conference realignment talk by DFW HOYA
[July 03, 2025, 07:58:45 PM]


Marquette freshmen at Goolsby's 7/12 by MU Fan in Connecticut
[July 03, 2025, 04:04:32 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

MUFlutieEffect

Currently sitting at 5-0, but likely to make it 6-1 by night's end (I'll assume the Hoyas win, but it appears Nova is goin' down).  Of course, regardless of tomorrow's outcome, we'll see one win and one loss with Marquette taking on Butler tomorrow evening.

NCAA: 3-0
Marquette: 1-0 (Marquette 59, Davidson 58)
Butler: 1-0 (Butler 68, Bucknell 56)
Creighton: 1-0 (Creighton 67, Cincinnati 63)
Georgetown: In-progress v. FGCU
Villanova: In-progress v. UNC

NIT: 2-0
St. John's: 1-0 (St. John's 63, St. Joseph's 61)
Providence: 1-0 (Providence 75, Charlotte 66)

No Postseason
Xavier
DePaul
Seton Hall
The Flutie Effect: "A significant and positive correlation between a university having a successful team and higher quality of incoming freshmen, alumni donations, and graduation rates."

- The Economist, January 3rd, 2007

mu_hilltopper

Quote from: MUFlutieEffect on March 22, 2013, 07:08:00 PM
Currently sitting at 5-0, but likely to make it 6-1 by night's end (I'll assume the Hoyas win, but it appears Nova is goin' down). 


Yeahhhhhh .. about Georgetown...

nathanziarek

Marquette Basketball on Reddit: http://reddit.com/r/mubb

Blackhat

Weird seeing Xavier sitting out a tournament.   Hopefully Chris Mack isn't tanking that program.


Georgetown again underachieving as it stands currently.

MUFlutieEffect

Updated at the conclusion of the Round of 64:

NCAA: 3-2
Marquette: 1-0 (Marquette 59, Davidson 58)
Butler: 1-0 (Butler 68, Bucknell 56)
Creighton: 1-0 (Creighton 67, Cincinnati 63)
Georgetown: 0-1 (Florida Gulf Coast 78, Georgetown 68)
Villanova: 0-1 (North Carolina 78, Villanova 71)

NIT: 2-0
St. John's: 1-0 (St. John's 63, St. Joseph's 61)
Providence: 1-0 (Providence 75, Charlotte 66)

No Postseason
Xavier
DePaul
Seton Hall
The Flutie Effect: "A significant and positive correlation between a university having a successful team and higher quality of incoming freshmen, alumni donations, and graduation rates."

- The Economist, January 3rd, 2007

mu_hilltopper


Eldon

Do most teams even play their starters in the NIT?

Litehouse


LastWarrior

Quote from: Litehouse on March 22, 2013, 09:41:40 PM
Why would X turn down the CBI?

I don't know but if you don't make the NCAA or NIT, how bad are you and do you really want to admit being in the CBI? 
"The Lord is a Warrior" - Exodus 15:3

Litehouse

Texas, Purdue and Richmond accepted invites. Does Xavier think they're too good to play with Texas?  Get the kids some more experience and build toward next year.

MUFlutieEffect

Quote from: Litehouse on March 23, 2013, 06:57:11 AM
Texas, Purdue and Richmond accepted invites. Does Xavier think they're too good to play with Texas?  Get the kids some more experience and build toward next year.

Agreed - seems as though X is feeling a sense of superiority.  On the other hand, how furious would MU fans be if Marquette won the CBI and wanted to hang a banner for it?
The Flutie Effect: "A significant and positive correlation between a university having a successful team and higher quality of incoming freshmen, alumni donations, and graduation rates."

- The Economist, January 3rd, 2007

mu_hilltopper

Quote from: MUFlutieEffect on March 23, 2013, 07:38:04 AM
.. how furious would MU fans be if Marquette won the CBI and wanted to hang a banner for it?

They would be 3% furious.  The other 97% who aren't internet nerds would be fine with it.

keefe

Quote from: MUFlutieEffect on March 23, 2013, 07:38:04 AM
how furious would MU fans be if Marquette won the CBI and wanted to hang a banner for it?

The guy who would have done that was fired in 2008. Fired for cause, I might add.


Death on call

Litehouse

So, if we win the conference tournament next year, does it get it's own banner? or do we just add another year to the existing National Catholic Tournament banner?

Mr. Nielsen

Quote from: Litehouse on March 22, 2013, 09:41:40 PM
Why would X turn down the CBI?
The CBI is a pay to play tourney. If you get a home game you better get 3,000 in attendance just to break even on the cost.
If we are all thinking alike, we're not thinking at all. It's OK to disagree. Just don't be disagreeable.
-Bill Walton

Villacats

UNC was a terrible matchup for Nova. Would have rather played any other 3-8 seed in the field last night except maybe VCU. Cats have got a lot of fight in them though, I liked that. Looking forward to next year. Good luck tonight.

Mr. Nielsen

I was very happy how Nova showed alot fight to come back and take the lead. It was very ugly for them. I think it was 32-13 UNC at one point.
If we are all thinking alike, we're not thinking at all. It's OK to disagree. Just don't be disagreeable.
-Bill Walton

MUFlutieEffect

And then there were two (only Marquette and Providence are left playing)...

Updated at the conclusion of the Round of 64:

NCAA: 4-4
Marquette: 2-0 (Marquette 59, Davidson 58; Marquette 74, Butler 72)
Butler: 1-1 (Butler 68, Bucknell 56; Marquette 74, Butler 72)
Creighton: 1-1 (Creighton 67, Cincinnati 63; Duke 66, Creighton 50)
Georgetown: 0-1 (Florida Gulf Coast 78, Georgetown 68)
Villanova: 0-1 (North Carolina 78, Villanova 71)

NIT: 2-1
St. John's: 1-1 (St. John's 63, St. Joseph's 61; Virginia 68, St. John's 50)
Providence: 1-0 (Providence 75, Charlotte 66)

No Postseason
Xavier
DePaul
Seton Hall
The Flutie Effect: "A significant and positive correlation between a university having a successful team and higher quality of incoming freshmen, alumni donations, and graduation rates."

- The Economist, January 3rd, 2007

Coleman

So, assuming no more wins for the rest of the conference this year, what's the NCAA and NIT credit situation going into the new league? How much do we collectively bring together, including past credits and credits earned this year?

Eldon

Quote from: Victor McCormick on March 25, 2013, 09:56:09 AM
So, assuming no more wins for the rest of the conference this year, what's the NCAA and NIT credit situation going into the new league? How much do we collectively bring together, including past credits and credits earned this year?

I was wondering the same thing.  Should I be rooting for Cuse because we get more money?  Or did we forego all of that for the BE name?

Coleman

I believe we don't get Cuse or L'ville's money. Its just the C7 that goes with us, along with Creighton and Xavier's credits. Its my understanding Butler's credits stay with the A-10.

Litehouse

I'm pretty sure we don't get Xavier or Creighton's credits either.  The credits stay with the conference.

Coleman

Dang. I know generally that's how it works but I thought I remembered reading that Creighton and X had special arrangements with the MVC and A-10 respectively (I thought Xavier in particular kept all NCAA credits earned, it was not shared amongst the conference). Maybe that was just exit fees though.

Litehouse

Each conference can distribute the credits however they want.  I believe the A10 had an arrangement where they would distibute half the money from any credits to the team that earned them first, then the other half got split with everyon else.  But it's still up to the conference to distribute it, and I seriously doubt they'll give any to a school after they leave.  Just like how we left behind the credits for our 2003 run with C-USA.

chapman

Believe the A-10 rule, or X's situation specifically was that they keep most or all of their own credits - but it was conditional on still being a member of the conference.  

The UL, Cuse, exit fees and credits are with the football schools.  Our cash takeaway in the split was a lump sum of $10M, so the reward of the additional credits earned, and the risk that goes along with any issues they might have collecting the exit fee money, etc. are all on them.

Previous topic - Next topic