collapse

Resources

Stud of Georgetown Game

Nigel James Jr.

20 points, 6 rebounds,
6 assists, 3 steals,
36 minutes

2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross5
James Jr4
Parham1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

The CB Crown Tournament - 2026 by Scoop Snoop
[Today at 02:19:46 PM]


2026 Coaching Carousel by Hards Alumni
[Today at 02:04:25 PM]


Important Win by wiscwarrior
[Today at 01:48:46 PM]


James/Stevens by PointWarrior
[Today at 01:08:16 PM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by DFW HOYA
[Today at 11:57:30 AM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by MU82
[Today at 12:30:05 AM]


Offensive Four Factors Outlook 2025-26 by Newsdreams
[February 25, 2026, 10:30:16 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  DePaul

Marquette
76
Marquette vs
DePaul
Date/Time: Mar 1, 2026, 3:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Georgetown
60

PaintTouchesSays

Player Grades: Marquette vs DePaul
      


Written by: Andrei Greska
            


Vander Blue (18 pts, 3 reb, 2 ast) You can tell Blue has taken it to the next level when he has a quiet game and still scores 18. Vander had one nice pull-up jumper in the first but did ... Continue reading →


            

http://painttouches.com/2013/02/09/player-grades-marquette-vs-depaul/
      

BM1090

Thanks.

Just fyi there is no blurb on Jamil and Mayo had more than three points.

PaintTouches


wadesworld

I like the idea, but nobody below a C in a game that we beat 1-9 DePaul by 11?  I'd say as a team we were at a C-, which would mean a few players would be (well) below that.

AZWarrior

#4
Quote from: wadesworld on February 09, 2013, 04:24:48 PM
I like the idea, but nobody below a C in a game that we beat 1-9 DePaul by 11?  I'd say as a team we were at a C-, which would mean a few players would be (well) below that.

One could make an argument our D could have been better, but we shot 56% from the field, 89% from the line (making more FTs than they attempted) while out rebounding them as well.

C-, eh?  You're a tough grader.
All this talk of rights.  So little talk of responsibilities.

wadesworld

Quote from: AZWarrior on February 09, 2013, 04:29:16 PM
One could make an argument our D could have been better, but we shot 56% from the field, 89% from the line (making more FTs than they attempted) while out rebounding them as well.

C-, eh?You're a tough grader.

Our defense absolutely should have been better.  There is no doubt about that.  The offensive numbers were great, but so is every teams' who plays DePaul.

Nukem2

The grades should have been much lower given that no one played defense.

Previous topic - Next topic