collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: Louisville leaving for ACC  (Read 18304 times)

Litehouse

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2211
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #50 on: November 28, 2012, 10:04:47 AM »
BE is every bit as culpable if you go back years ago when they added Miami, Va. Tech, WVU, etc

I thought those three were independents before they joined the Big East?

Canned Goods n Ammo

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5008
  • Ammo, clean shaven Ammo.
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #51 on: November 28, 2012, 10:10:28 AM »
Congress needs to stay away.  Not a federal matter in the least.

I'm no fan of congress getting involved in most matters, but it is interesting if you consider that tax dollars are directly or indirectly funding a lot of this movement/buy-out stuff.

I'm sure there is creative accounting to get around it, but if I'm a Maryland tax payer, and I find out they are using my money to buy themselves out of the ACC, I'm going to be pretty pissed and start hammering my congressman.

I know it's a long-shot, but anytime tax dollars and grandstanding are involved, Congress isn't too far off.

PBRme

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 529
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #52 on: November 28, 2012, 10:14:22 AM »
Georgia and UNC to B1G
Peace, Love, and Rye Whiskey...May your life and your glass always be full

wiscwarrior

  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 155
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #53 on: November 28, 2012, 10:16:15 AM »
Congress needs to stay away.  Not a federal matter in the least.

Anti Trust implications are not a Federal matter?

Litehouse

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2211
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #54 on: November 28, 2012, 10:18:45 AM »
Or the fact that these athletic departments and conferences are really multi-million dollar corporations in partnerships with television networks masquerading as a wing of a tax exempt university.  If all these schools want to say the athletic departments are separate and self-funding and don't use public tax money to support themselves, then let's really treat them as separate and tax them as a separate entity, disallow charitable deductions for athletic donations, and make them pay property taxes on their facilities.

From a state perspective, if the university is able to make all this money through athletics, they should use this money as a profit center to fund the rest of the university and stop asking state tax-payers to support everything else.

M@RQUETTEW@RRIORS

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 253
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #55 on: November 28, 2012, 10:23:28 AM »
Or the fact that these athletic departments and conferences are really multi-million dollar corporations in partnerships with television networks masquerading as a wing of a tax exempt university.  If all these schools want to say the athletic departments are separate and self-funding and don't use public tax money to support themselves, then let's really treat them as separate and tax them as a separate entity, disallow charitable deductions for athletic donations, and make them pay property taxes on their facilities.

From a state perspective, if the university is able to make all this money through athletics, they should use this money as a profit center to fund the rest of the university and stop asking state tax-payers to support everything else.
Especially when you consider the cost of attending these institutions keeps rising at the rate it does.

jficke13

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1372
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #56 on: November 28, 2012, 10:25:41 AM »
Georgia and UNC to B1G

Are you just typing things? Predicting what you think will happen? Or have you read this somewhere like it's actually imminent? Links would be helpful.

Tommy Brice for Coach

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 386
  • Tommy Brice is my hero
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #57 on: November 28, 2012, 10:29:45 AM »
Are you just typing things? Predicting what you think will happen? Or have you read this somewhere like it's actually imminent? Links would be helpful.

+1

JTBMU7

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 555
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #58 on: November 28, 2012, 10:40:59 AM »
My point was why join that conference when you can just pick off the best pieces and begin anew.
you can't reasonably just "begin anew" when talking about a conference. it's just not realistic. the A10 has good tradition, solid programs, a better fit with the other universitys, east coast exposure, Brooklyn for their tourney... basically we would be moving to stable ground, despite the lower half of the league being weak (though which league doesnt have a weak bottom half?)

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #59 on: November 28, 2012, 10:46:10 AM »
Anti Trust implications are not a Federal matter?


Where is the anti-trust issue here?

nyg

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7500
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #60 on: November 28, 2012, 10:46:47 AM »
Georgia and UNC to B1G

Georgia to leave SEC, I don't think so.  No one leaving SEC, they might raid the ACC though.  

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #61 on: November 28, 2012, 10:47:17 AM »
Or the fact that these athletic departments and conferences are really multi-million dollar corporations in partnerships with television networks masquerading as a wing of a tax exempt university.  If all these schools want to say the athletic departments are separate and self-funding and don't use public tax money to support themselves, then let's really treat them as separate and tax them as a separate entity, disallow charitable deductions for athletic donations, and make them pay property taxes on their facilities.


That's fine.  You can do all of this.  But you realize that is just going to make the grab for money all that more intense right?

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #62 on: November 28, 2012, 10:50:07 AM »
I'm no fan of congress getting involved in most matters, but it is interesting if you consider that tax dollars are directly or indirectly funding a lot of this movement/buy-out stuff.

I'm sure there is creative accounting to get around it, but if I'm a Maryland tax payer, and I find out they are using my money to buy themselves out of the ACC, I'm going to be pretty pissed and start hammering my congressman.

I know it's a long-shot, but anytime tax dollars and grandstanding are involved, Congress isn't too far off.


It would be more useful to hammer your state legislator.  Congress isn't going to get involved in state tax dollars being used for these purposes.  It is a state issue.

Dawson Rental

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10456
  • I prefer a team that's eligible, not paid for
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #63 on: November 28, 2012, 10:51:50 AM »
I'm no fan of congress getting involved in most matters, but it is interesting if you consider that tax dollars are directly or indirectly funding a lot of this movement/buy-out stuff.

I'm sure there is creative accounting to get around it, but if I'm a Maryland tax payer, and I find out they are using my money to buy themselves out of the ACC, I'm going to be pretty pissed and start hammering my congressman.

I know it's a long-shot, but anytime tax dollars and grandstanding are involved, Congress isn't too far off.


Why should Congress get involved with how the State of Maryland spends its tax dollars?  If they did get involved which side do you think the members of Congress from Minnesota, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, etc will be on?
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

PBRme

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 529
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #64 on: November 28, 2012, 10:53:57 AM »
Georgia to leave SEC, I don't think so.  No one leaving SEC, they might raid the ACC though.  

I think Georgia is looking for more Academic prestige.  They already view themselves as Vandy like in their student population.  Virginia is out because it would need to be a VaTech package deal.  The B1G is a lot more money and would be even more with the Atlanta market.  The next logical choices are Mizzou, Fla State, and Miami.
Peace, Love, and Rye Whiskey...May your life and your glass always be full

Dawson Rental

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10456
  • I prefer a team that's eligible, not paid for
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #65 on: November 28, 2012, 10:54:50 AM »

That's fine.  You can do all of this.  But you realize that is just going to make the grab for money all that more intense right?

I get your point.  But, can the money grab really get any more intense?
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

Canned Goods n Ammo

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5008
  • Ammo, clean shaven Ammo.
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #66 on: November 28, 2012, 10:55:37 AM »

It would be more useful to hammer your state legislator.  Congress isn't going to get involved in state tax dollars being used for these purposes.  It is a state issue.

Yea, you're right, to start.

I'm not saying congress should get involved, but anytime there are millions of tax dollars and an opportunity to grandstand, you can bet somebody in the federal government is going to take some action.


Canned Goods n Ammo

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5008
  • Ammo, clean shaven Ammo.
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #67 on: November 28, 2012, 10:59:16 AM »
Why should Congress get involved with how the State of Maryland spends its tax dollars?  If they did get involved which side do you think the members of Congress from Minnesota, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, etc will be on?

It's certainly a state issue to start. I'm not an expert of federal finance protocol, so maybe it would never reach the fed. level.

I'm just assuming with this volume of $ moving around, and this amount of publicity, somebody at the Fed. level will eventually want to get involved.


T-Bone

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2133
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #68 on: November 28, 2012, 11:04:03 AM »
Why should Congress get involved with how the State of Maryland spends its tax dollars?  If they did get involved which side do you think the members of Congress from Minnesota, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, etc will be on?

There are substantial federal dollars that go to funding education (along with state taxes).

University of Illinois 15.3% of their funding comes from "US Grants and Contracts/Federal Appropriations"  (18.3 from state)
Wisconsin System is about 26% coming from Federal Grants and Contracts.  ($871 million -- $397 comes from state) 

(Look up any school + annual report to get data)
« Last Edit: November 28, 2012, 11:07:07 AM by T-Bone »
I'm like a turtle, sometimes I get run over by a semi.

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #69 on: November 28, 2012, 11:05:29 AM »
I get your point.  But, can the money grab really get any more intense?


Sure.  You ramp up the costs even more, which is what taxation will do, and schools are going to get more desperate.

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #70 on: November 28, 2012, 11:05:54 AM »
There are substantial federal dollars that go to funding education (along with state taxes).

University of Illinois 15.3% of their funding comes from "US Grants and Contracts/Federal Appropriations"
Wisconsin System is about 26% coming from Federal Grants and Contracts.  ($871 million)

(Look up any school + annual report to get data)


But that money is used for research, student financial aid, etc.  It isn't used for athletics.

Litehouse

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2211
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #71 on: November 28, 2012, 11:06:43 AM »
I don't see any way an SEC team leaves for the Big Ten, the money isn't that much different.  They have such a good thing going right now and the quality of football still matters to their fans, no way they give that up to play in the Big Ten and watch their attendance decrease.  Maybe Missouri, but they just got there and I doubt they feel like paying another exit fee this soon.

Tums Festival

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1284
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #72 on: November 28, 2012, 11:08:06 AM »
Georgia (or any other school) is not leaving the SEC. I agree with some of the posts here that the ACC could be ripe for picking by both the SEC and B1G.
"Every day ends with a Tums festival!"

Dawson Rental

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10456
  • I prefer a team that's eligible, not paid for
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #73 on: November 28, 2012, 11:09:01 AM »
I don't see any way an SEC team leaves for the Big Ten, the money isn't that much different.  They have such a good thing going right now and the quality of football still matters to their fans, no way they give that up to play in the Big Ten and watch their attendance decrease.  Maybe Missouri, but they just got there and I doubt they feel like paying another exit fee this soon.

The SEC exit fee is zero.  They know where they sit in this game.
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

Groin_pull

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1861
Re: Louisville leaving for ACC
« Reply #74 on: November 28, 2012, 11:10:06 AM »
Georgia (or any other school) is not leaving the SEC. I agree with some of the posts here that the ACC could be ripe for picking by both the SEC and B1G.


How about we just have a 40-team Big 10 and be done with all this crap?

 

feedback