collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

2025-26 Schedule by Mr. Nielsen
[September 13, 2025, 09:57:00 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

GGGG

According to Mark Miller.

He says it is a great home court advantage, and I am sure it is, but at a capacity of 3,400, it is the smallest arena in the Horizon League. 

Stronghold

Any idea what their average attendance has been in recent years at the U.S. Cellular?  I doubt it was much higher than 3,400 so they should be able to pack the Klotsche and actually get some of those drunk UWM kids to support the team.  Will create a better buzz about the team around campus for sure.

GGGG

Actually, according to the NCAA database, it was 4,154.  Their long term goal is an on campus arena for basketball so maybe they view this as a necessary step toward that.

MerrittsMustache

UWM averaged 2,883 in 2010 and 4,154 in 2011.

Seems like a good move, although you'd think that if they had a 5,000 or 6,000-seat arena on campus, they'd be able to fill it. It's a shame that UWM athletics don't have much of a following - most of the UWM alums that I know are Badger fans.

Canned Goods n Ammo

Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on June 26, 2012, 03:50:49 PM
Actually, according to the NCAA database, it was 4,154.  Their long term goal is an on campus arena for basketball so maybe they view this as a necessary step toward that.

Yea, my guess might be that if they can sell-out 3400 on their campus week-in, week-out, they can then try to justify expanding or building a new on-campus facility (maybe 6k?).

Hard to justify it when they are only drawing 4k downtown.


MUfan12

Quote from: MerrittsMustache on June 26, 2012, 03:54:18 PM
UWM averaged 2,883 in 2010 and 4,154 in 2011.

They hosted UW in 2011, which drew around 9k. So it skewed the numbers a bit.

Mr. Nielsen

The UW-UWM was over 10,000.

It's a good move for the Panthers, ONLY because the rent is too high and the WCD get $2 off of every ticket UWM sells.

If we are all thinking alike, we're not thinking at all. It's OK to disagree. Just don't be disagreeable.
-Bill Walton

jmayer1

Quote from: mupanther on June 26, 2012, 07:35:24 PM
The UW-UWM was over 10,000.

It's a good move for the Panthers, ONLY because the rent is too high and the WCD get $2 off of every ticket UWM sells.



Disagree. This furthers the idea that UW-Milwaukee is a low major. Ticket sales will shrink as fewer people want to trek to the Eastside without near as many dining/drinking options and they will lose any momentum they had towards building a new arena. It would not surprise me to see UW-Milwaukee step back down to D2 or D3 in the next 5 to 10 years.

martyconlonontherun

Quote from: jmayer1 on June 26, 2012, 10:08:41 PM
Disagree. This furthers the idea that UW-Milwaukee is a low major. Ticket sales will shrink as fewer people want to trek to the Eastside without near as many dining/drinking options and they will lose any momentum they had towards building a new arena. It would not surprise me to see UW-Milwaukee step back down to D2 or D3 in the next 5 to 10 years.
Are you trying to say that the 3,000 (minus the UW game) fans a game went because the game was played downtown? I bet most were families with children looking for a cheap game, alums, or students. For the first two groups, I don't think it matters much where it is played. The students attending would go up a lot out of pure convenience. There are plenty of places to eat on Oakland/North and I'm sure businesses would look at starting shuttle service.

Dawson Rental

MU should do the neighborly thing and offer them the McGuire Center at a discount.
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

Hards Alumni

Quote from: jmayer1 on June 26, 2012, 10:08:41 PM
Disagree. This furthers the idea that UW-Milwaukee is a low major. Ticket sales will shrink as fewer people want to trek to the Eastside without near as many dining/drinking options and they will lose any momentum they had towards building a new arena. It would not surprise me to see UW-Milwaukee step back down to D2 or D3 in the next 5 to 10 years.

I think you're totally off your nut.

GGGG

Quote from: jmayer1 on June 26, 2012, 10:08:41 PM
Disagree. This furthers the idea that UW-Milwaukee is a low major. Ticket sales will shrink as fewer people want to trek to the Eastside without near as many dining/drinking options and they will lose any momentum they had towards building a new arena. It would not surprise me to see UW-Milwaukee step back down to D2 or D3 in the next 5 to 10 years.


Absolutely not.  Klotsche is not a great arena by any stretch, but it is a cheaper place for them to play and will guaranty more student support.  And I have no idea what "momentum" they have been building recently, because they have by and large been mediocre, but playing in front of less than a half-full building doesn't help.

And I can guaranty you that UWM will not be stepping down to D2 or D3.  You don't hire the former Ohio State AD as an interim with the thought that they are downgrading their program.

jmayer1

Quote from: martyconlonontherun on June 26, 2012, 10:24:31 PM
Are you trying to say that the 3,000 (minus the UW game) fans a game went because the game was played downtown? I bet most were families with children looking for a cheap game, alums, or students. For the first two groups, I don't think it matters much where it is played. The students attending would go up a lot out of pure convenience. There are plenty of places to eat on Oakland/North and I'm sure businesses would look at starting shuttle service.

There are people that either work downtown or drive downtown, grab something to eat/drink and head to the game. There aren't any places to walk from by the KC. Shuttles are great, but that's not nearly as convenient for a fanbase that is already quite apathetic. Reading their board and looking at the comments on JS, there are already a handful of people saying they won't renew. When only 3,000 people are coming to games it doesn't take many people not coming to have a drop in attendance.

jmayer1

#13
Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on June 27, 2012, 07:21:25 AM

Absolutely not.  Klotsche is not a great arena by any stretch, but it is a cheaper place for them to play and will guaranty more student support.  And I have no idea what "momentum" they have been building recently, because they have by and large been mediocre, but playing in front of less than a half-full building doesn't help.

And I can guaranty you that UWM will not be stepping down to D2 or D3.  You don't hire the former Ohio State AD as an interim with the thought that they are downgrading their program.

Everybody keeps bringing up $$ savings but they were only paying $230k a year plus $2 a ticket and I'm sure splitting concession money in some way. At most I'd think you're talking about $400k (assuming they keep prices the same and pocket the extra $2 a ticket). Is the program in such dire straits that $400k a year hurts them that bad? If so, they don't ever have to worry about getting a new arena (maybe they need that $$ to pay an AD that is way overqualified for the position).

I was only referencing any momentum they had in regards to building a new arena with the announcemnt they had started looking into it and were supposedly looking at some locations, not on the court (where they've been mediocre as you said). Playing in, and not being able to sell out, a glorified high school gym won't look good for any hope of a new arena in my opinion.

This is all just my opinion, I could be totally off-base, but I don't think this move has many positives (maybe more students attend, maybe), especially in regards to attendanace and perception, including by recruits.

PBRme

Which UW-M are we discussing Milwaukee or Madison ;D
Peace, Love, and Rye Whiskey...May your life and your glass always be full

GGGG

Quote from: jmayer1 on June 27, 2012, 07:54:54 AM
Everybody keeps bringing up $$ savings but they were only paying $230k a year plus $2 a ticket and I'm sure splitting concession money in some way. At most I'd think you're talking about $400k (assuming they keep prices the same and pocket the extra $2 a ticket). Is the program in such dire straits that $400k a year hurts them that bad? If so, they don't ever have to worry about getting a new arena (maybe they need that $$ to pay an AD that is way overqualified for the position).

I was only referencing any momentum they had in regards to building a new arena with the announcemnt they had started looking into it and were supposedly looking at some locations, not on the court (where they've been mediocre as you said). Playing in, and not being able to sell out, a glorified high school gym won't look good for any hope of a new arena in my opinion.

This is all just my opinion, I could be totally off-base, but I don't think this move has many positives (maybe more students attend, maybe), especially in regards to attendanace and perception, including by recruits.


Geiger is a short-timer.  He is going to be gone in 12-18 months.  But I know that one of their priorities is a new, on-campus arena.

But I understand what you are saying.  I guess after the year is done we can figure out if it made sense for them.

MerrittsMustache

Quote from: jmayer1 on June 27, 2012, 07:54:54 AM
I was only referencing any momentum they had in regards to building a new arena with the announcemnt they had started looking into it and were supposedly looking at some locations, not on the court (where they've been mediocre as you said). Playing in, and not being able to sell out, a glorified high school gym won't look good for any hope of a new arena in my opinion.

This is all just my opinion, I could be totally off-base, but I don't think this move has many positives (maybe more students attend, maybe), especially in regards to attendanace and perception, including by recruits.

It's a calculated risk. They want a new on-campus arena so they're going out to prove that they can fill their current 3,400-seat arena every night and still have a demand for tickets. Filling 20% of a large, off-campus arena wasn't going to help prove that an on-campus arena should be built.

madtownwarrior

#17
if a D1 team plays in D3 gym and in a league with no legitimate D1 teams (with Butler now gone),l is it still a D1 team?

martyconlonontherun

Quote from: jmayer1 on June 27, 2012, 07:52:44 AM
There are people that either work downtown or drive downtown, grab something to eat/drink and head to the game.

I'm just don't think there are that many people who are in the mindset that you point out. I don't see UWM games as a huge social venue where people go for random entertainment. I think the core fan base (which it is pretty much down to since only 3k attend) go to the games because they are specifically going to an UWM game, and not just random entertainment. I think the added students and decrease in costs really make up for it.

martyconlonontherun

Quote from: madtownwarrior on June 27, 2012, 08:46:03 AM
if a D1 team plays in D3 gym and in a league with no legitimate D1 teams (with Butler now gone),l is it still a D1 team?

Don't they still get an automatic qualifier for winning the tournament? That should help recruiting ever year if they make it to the dance yearly.

martyconlonontherun

Quote from: jmayer1 on June 27, 2012, 07:54:54 AM
Everybody keeps bringing up $$ savings but they were only paying $230k a year plus $2 a ticket and I'm sure splitting concession money in some way. At most I'd think you're talking about $400k (assuming they keep prices the same and pocket the extra $2 a ticket). Is the program in such dire straits that $400k a year hurts them that bad? If so, they don't ever have to worry about getting a new arena (maybe they need that $$ to pay an AD that is way overqualified for the position).

Based on $230,000 divided by 3,000 per game and 14 games at the US Cell plus $2 per ticket, its ~$7.50 a ticket going to the Cell. Considering they we selling 2 season tickets for $99 at one point, let's assume the average ticket was $15 (and that's being generous considering students don't pay that much) and half the ticket price is going towards the stadium. Food for thought.

jmayer1

#21
Quote from: martyconlonontherun on June 27, 2012, 08:52:17 AM
I'm just don't think there are that many people who are in the mindset that you point out. I don't see UWM games as a huge social venue where people go for random entertainment. I think the core fan base (which it is pretty much down to since only 3k attend) go to the games because they are specifically going to an UWM game, and not just random entertainment. I think the added students and decrease in costs really make up for it.

There are plenty of season ticket holders on their board and in the comments section of the JS story saying they will cancel and go to fewer games, stating that the move away from the convenience of downtown to a bush league gym is the reason why. Time will tell if that actually happens or not.

This move only makes sense, in my opinion, if an announcement of a new arena is imminent; which I believe is possible but not probable at this moment.

Canned Goods n Ammo

Quote from: jmayer1 on June 27, 2012, 09:28:03 AM
There are plenty of season ticket holders on their board and in the comments section of the JS story saying they will cancel and go to fewer games, stating that the move away from the convenience of downtown to a bush league gym is the reason why. Time will tell if that actually happens or not.

This move only makes sense, in my opinion, if an announcement of a new arena is imminent; which I believe is possible but not probable at this moment.

I would question the number of "professionals" who are going to games because it's downtown and it's convenient.

By that logic, shouldn't MU sell out every weeknight? Is there some huge contingent of urban professionals looking for convenient weeknight entertainment? I'm just not sure there is.

College students however, are lazy, and the ideal target for college athletics, so putting it on campus should pick up some student attendance.



brewcity77

Quote from: martyconlonontherun on June 27, 2012, 08:53:30 AM
Don't they still get an automatic qualifier for winning the tournament? That should help recruiting ever year if they make it to the dance yearly.

The Horizon does, but bear in mind UW-Milwaukee isn't the best Horizon League team in the state, much less the best team in the Horizon. They are definitely looking up at Cleveland State and Valpo right now, even with Butler gone, and Wardle seems to be making bigger strides than Jeter is.

Whatever UW-M does really doesn't make much difference to me, but I'd definitely hope Marquette never plays at the Klotsche. All the more reason this should be a buy series only. No sense in ever going to play in a <3,500-seat arena.

jmayer1

Quote from: Guns n Ammo on June 27, 2012, 09:50:25 AM
I would question the number of "professionals" who are going to games because it's downtown and it's convenient.

By that logic, shouldn't MU sell out every weeknight? Is there some huge contingent of urban professionals looking for convenient weeknight entertainment? I'm just not sure there is.

College students however, are lazy, and the ideal target for college athletics, so putting it on campus should pick up some student attendance.




I guess the people saying they won't renew for that exact reason (convenience, location, social atmosphere) are just lying.

It's not like these are random people looking for something to do, but rather UW-Milwaukee fans who either work downtown or like to make it a night downtown with the game, along with dinner/drinks, one of the things on their agenda. I don't know/care why those people do what they do, but it's pretty clear from reading their comments, that some people aren't happy with the move and as a result, won't go to as many games. Maybe this is just a small minority, but they seem to be pretty vocal. I guess we'll just have to see how it plays out.

Previous topic - Next topic