collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

25 YEARS OF THE AP TOP 25 by Galway Eagle
[Today at 01:43:39 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by TAMU, Knower of Ball
[July 05, 2025, 08:30:08 PM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by DoctorV
[July 05, 2025, 01:45:54 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by Billy Hoyle
[July 04, 2025, 09:32:02 PM]


More conference realignment talk by DFW HOYA
[July 03, 2025, 07:58:45 PM]


Marquette freshmen at Goolsby's 7/12 by MU Fan in Connecticut
[July 03, 2025, 04:04:32 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

Skatastrophy


GGGG

Who would have guessed Florida International had so many good players.

real chili 83

Quote from: Skatastrophy on May 16, 2012, 09:40:49 PM
http://mhermher.blogspot.com/2012/05/breakdown-of-nba-playoff-minutes.html

Great showing by MU (even if it is mostly dwade).  Here's a preview img:



Why isn't Wisconsin and Notre Dame on this list?  Too many traditionals?  ;D

Bocephys

I believe Lazar had two of those the other night. Let's not short sell his contributions to the cause.

77ncaachamps

Quote from: Bocephys on May 16, 2012, 09:46:16 PM
I believe Lazar had two of those the other night. Let's not short sell his contributions to the cause.

But the chart shows Round One minutes.

His minutes would count towards Round Two.
SS Marquette

Bocephys

Quote from: 77ncaachamps on May 17, 2012, 10:02:50 AM
But the chart shows Round One minutes.

His minutes would count towards Round Two.

Good catch, I didn't realize that chart was just for round 1.

MarquetteDano

Seeing that chart by conference confirmed my belief about the Big Ten.  The Big Ten outperforms their talent level.  The ACC, SEC, & PAC-12 are usually loaded with talent but they actually underperform versus their talent levels.

Yes, yes, the ACC has probably been the best conference the past "X" amount of years, but if you look at the talent they have, the schools still underperform.

It would have been more interesting to see the ACC numbers not including Pitt and Cuse as that definitely skewed the ACC data.

🏀

Quote from: MarquetteDano on May 17, 2012, 12:20:18 PM
Seeing that chart by conference confirmed my belief about the Big Ten.  The Big Ten outperforms their talent level.  The ACC, SEC, & PAC-12 are usually loaded with talent but they actually underperform versus their talent levels.

Yes, yes, the ACC has probably been the best conference the past "X" amount of years, but if you look at the talent they have, the schools still underperform.

It would have been more interesting to see the ACC numbers not including Pitt and Cuse as that definitely skewed the ACC data.

OSU and MSU are usually well-stocked in the talent cabinet, and those are the only two on the list. So, I wouldn't draw that parallel

77ncaachamps

Quote from: PTM on May 17, 2012, 12:23:46 PM
OSU and MSU are usually well-stocked in the talent cabinet, and those are the only two on the list. So, I wouldn't draw that parallel

What?!? No Wisconsin?

Devin Harris?
Greg Stiemesma?
Jon Leuer?
SS Marquette

bamamarquettefan

Quote from: Skatastrophy on May 16, 2012, 09:40:49 PM
http://mhermher.blogspot.com/2012/05/breakdown-of-nba-playoff-minutes.html

Great showing by MU (even if it is mostly dwade).  Here's a preview img:




Great stuff, and good job for Lazar getting in 5 minutes in the first round for the team I've got to believe is the favorite now after the injuries to the Bulls eliminated them and the injury to Bosh has the HEat in peril.
The www.valueaddsports.com analysis of basketball, football and baseball players are intended to neither be too hot or too cold - hundreds immerse themselves in studies of stats not of interest to broader fan bases (too hot), while others still insist on pure observation (too cold).

MarquetteDano

#10
Quote from: PTM on May 17, 2012, 12:23:46 PM
OSU and MSU are usually well-stocked in the talent cabinet, and those are the only two on the list. So, I wouldn't draw that parallel

Not talking about OSU & MSU alone.  If you look further down the list you will see the Big Ten as a conference gets the least amount of minutes among the major conferences.  However the Big Ten has not been the worst of the major conferences year in and year out.


cheebs09

Awesome information. Just curious, what is meant by Adjusted Minutes?

Otule's Glass Eye

Quote from: 77ncaachamps on May 17, 2012, 01:47:58 PM
What?!? No Wisconsin?

Devin Harris?
Greg Stiemesma?
Jon Leuer?

Harris played 1st round with Utah, Stiemsma doesn't play much, and Leuer plays on the Bucks, who are rarely in the playoffs.

buckchuckler

Quote from: 77ncaachamps on May 17, 2012, 01:47:58 PM
What?!? No Wisconsin?

Devin Harris?
Greg Stiemesma?
Jon Leuer?


Way to be cocky since there is exactly 1 impact MU player. 

Bocephys

Quote from: buckchuckler on May 18, 2012, 03:46:06 PM

Way to be cocky since there is exactly 1 impact MU player. 

Which is infinitely more impact players than Wisconsin!

buckchuckler

Quote from: Bocephys on May 18, 2012, 03:49:45 PM
Which is infinitely more impact players than Wisconsin!


Haha, ok fair enough. 

Previous topic - Next topic