Main Menu
collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

brewcity77

The NCAA is changing the qualification requirements for JUCO players. From now on, they have to have a transfer GPA of 2.5, which is higher than the old requirement (2.0) but also the minimum for incoming freshmen (2.3). Looks essentially like they're just trying to weed JUCOs out of Division 1. Really crappy decision by the NCAA.

http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketballnation/post/_/id/58001/ncaa-reform-will-have-big-effect-on-jc-level

seinfeld

what is the logic behind having it above the freshman minimum?

brewcity77

Quote from: seinfeld on April 17, 2012, 04:16:28 PM
what is the logic behind having it above the freshman minimum?

It's the NCAA, they don't need logic.

seinfeld


Badgerhater

Meanwhile at Kentucky . . . . .oh look, a squirrel!
When we stop talking, really bad stuff happens.

martyconlonontherun

Not familiar with the restrictions or what they actually mean, but I would think it would be an escalating GPA since JUCOs are older. For freshmen, they are still young and immature. JUCOs are older and are suppose to be more academically mature. I know some schools have min major requirements where if your a freshmen requirements are lower than if you are a junior. From my limited understanding, it makes sense to me.

Does that make any sense for those that actually understand the limits?

warthog-driver

Designed to punish non-traditional players?

tower912

Good call.   Chicos name-dropped his way into the NCAA inner circle and had them do this so that he could feel less squirmy.   
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

warthog-driver

Quote from: tower912 on April 17, 2012, 07:05:41 PM
Good call.   Chicos name-dropped his way into the NCAA inner circle and had them do this so that he could feel less squirmy.   

The Bail Bondsman is the one who invented the term, "non-traditional player" as code for racial categorizing. He also has a major hard-on against Jucos.

tower912

Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

warthog-driver

Quote from: tower912 on April 17, 2012, 07:10:30 PM
I know.   We agree. 

How I miss those days of veiled racist commentary.

tower912

It's still here.   It just goes around on the rim.
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

Hoopaloop

Marquette fans that are against JUCO players are racist?  What a leap you are making. 

If a person was a Marquette basketball fan, a wildly passionate fan of the team including all members of the team (black, white, etc) are they racist?  If that same fan didn't want many JUCO players because they only play for 2 years instead of 4, or because of some other reason (informed or otherwise), that would make them racist?

That is quite a leap of logic that makes no sense.

I don't care if we take JUCO players or not, but there are many MU fans that do care.  If they choose to feel that way it has nothing to do with racism if they are indeed fans of the very same African American race of players that are there for four years.  Or are you saying these fans are only partially racist against JUCO African Americans but not four year African Americans?  You can see how quickly your arguments have already derailed from the tracks.
"Since you asked, since you pretend to know why I'm not posting here anymore, let me make this as clear as I can for you Ners.  You are the reason I'm not posting here anymore."   BMA725  http://www.muscoop.com/index.php?topic=28095.msg324636#msg324636

Dawson Rental

Boy, am I ever out of it.  I thought non-traditional players meant white guys who don't go to Wisconsin.
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

warthog-driver

Quote from: LittleMurs on April 17, 2012, 07:47:51 PM
Boy, am I ever out of it.  I thought non-traditional players meant white guys who don't go to Wisconsin.

ou are partially correct. Non-Traditional players are white guys who go to Wisconsin and thrive under Bo Ryan.

Hoopaloop

Quote from: seinfeld on April 17, 2012, 04:16:28 PM
what is the logic behind having it above the freshman minimum?

Don't you know, the NCAA is racist and they have it in for the African American JUCO players (but not the African American 4 year players).  It's all obvious to everyone, isn't?   ::)


The NCAA was asked to clean up some of the mess, academic and otherwise, from the last few years and beyond.  This is what they are trying to do.  Some people will like it and some will not.  There are too many kids leaving school that cannot properly read, write, or operate at basic levels of mathematics to survive in the real world.  The Presidents run the NCAA and they are trying to address this.  They may go to far or some will argue they do not go far enough.

Here's the other part of the requirements not listed in the JUCO ESPN article.   

http://collegebasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/17/academic-reforms-are-good-but-what-are-the-side-effects/


http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/7823800/ncaa-takes-academic-reform-again-college-basketball
"Since you asked, since you pretend to know why I'm not posting here anymore, let me make this as clear as I can for you Ners.  You are the reason I'm not posting here anymore."   BMA725  http://www.muscoop.com/index.php?topic=28095.msg324636#msg324636

Dr. Blackheart

#16
Quote from: Hoopaloop on April 17, 2012, 08:01:44 PM
Don't you know, the NCAA is racist and they have it in for the African American JUCO players (but not the African American 4 year players).  It's all obvious to everyone, isn't?   ::)


The NCAA was asked to clean up some of the mess, academic and otherwise, from the last few years and beyond.  This is what they are trying to do.  Some people will like it and some will not.  There are too many kids leaving school that cannot properly read, write, or operate at basic levels of mathematics to survive in the real world.  The Presidents run the NCAA and they are trying to address this.  They may go to far or some will argue they do not go far enough.

Here's the other part of the requirements not listed in the JUCO ESPN article.  

http://collegebasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/17/academic-reforms-are-good-but-what-are-the-side-effects/


http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/7823800/ncaa-takes-academic-reform-again-college-basketball


No way the 2.5 GPA stands or holds up in court.  Name the legal or academic accreditation precedence?  In fact, it is prejudiced as that is more than a student in good standing.

martyconlonontherun

Quote from: Dr. Blackheart on April 17, 2012, 09:04:07 PM
No way the 2.5 GPA stands or holds up i court.  Name the legal or academic accreditation precedence?  In fact, it is prejudiced as that is more than a student in good standing.
Was the no freshman rule ever tested in court? It was before my time so I don't know the details of the rule but I would think that is a similar situation where eligibility was based on academic success (aka passing enough classes for sophomore status without flunking out).

avid1010

Quote from: Hoopaloop on April 17, 2012, 08:01:44 PM
Don't you know, the NCAA is racist and they have it in for the African American JUCO players (but not the African American 4 year players).  It's all obvious to everyone, isn't?   ::)

i sometimes wonder if you even realize the level of what you post. 

Canadian Dimes

Personally, i dint have a huge deal with it.  Most jucos are the equivalent of dumbed down public high schools

MerrittsMustache

Quote from: Hoopaloop on April 17, 2012, 07:43:12 PM
Marquette fans that are against JUCO players are racist?  What a leap you are making. 

If a person was a Marquette basketball fan, a wildly passionate fan of the team including all members of the team (black, white, etc) are they racist?  If that same fan didn't want many JUCO players because they only play for 2 years instead of 4, or because of some other reason (informed or otherwise), that would make them racist?

That is quite a leap of logic that makes no sense.

I don't care if we take JUCO players or not, but there are many MU fans that do care.  If they choose to feel that way it has nothing to do with racism if they are indeed fans of the very same African American race of players that are there for four years.  Or are you saying these fans are only partially racist against JUCO African Americans but not four year African Americans?  You can see how quickly your arguments have already derailed from the tracks.

I think the comments you're responding to are in reference to Chicos' comment that MU needed more sharp-shooting traditional players like Wisconsin has. He later attempted to clarify but it initially felt he was saying that MU needed more white guys. It sounded even more ignorant considering MU had 4 guys (including 2 Jucos) shooting over 40% from 3 at the time.

Hoopaloop

Quote from: MerrittsMustache on April 18, 2012, 08:22:52 AM
I think the comments you're responding to are in reference to Chicos' comment that MU needed more sharp-shooting traditional players like Wisconsin has. He later attempted to clarify but it initially felt he was saying that MU needed more white guys. It sounded even more ignorant considering MU had 4 guys (including 2 Jucos) shooting over 40% from 3 at the time.


I remember reading the exchange and thought nothing of it.  Chicos could say the Pope was Catholic and there is an entourage here that would take him to task for saying it.  From afar, it was often about who said it, not what was said if you ask me.  You see the same thing with Murffius.  You could see the same thing with ErikJD not long ago.  I get the same treatment at times.   

If you define traditional as sharp shooting guys only then you are probably on to something.  Is that how traditional was defined?  Or is that how people wanted to define a poster's words?  I doubt very much he is a racist and remarks of that nature are in poor taste here.  As I explained yesterday, how is it he or any MU fan that supports the team (black, white, whatever) is suddenly a racist because they don't want JUCO players.  Wouldn't their opinion on JUCO players be driven by something other than race, especially when there are many four year players on the team that are also African American and these fans have no issue with those players?  The commentary from Tower and Warthog are overboard, especially from a US serviceman where I'd expect more from.  There are a number of people in the administration and fans that don't like the makeup of our teams and it has nothing to do with race but you would think with Warthog's comments that race is driving it.  Unfortunate that he is choosing those words as they paint many Marquette loving people incorrectly. 
"Since you asked, since you pretend to know why I'm not posting here anymore, let me make this as clear as I can for you Ners.  You are the reason I'm not posting here anymore."   BMA725  http://www.muscoop.com/index.php?topic=28095.msg324636#msg324636

warthog-driver

Quote from: Hoopaloop on April 18, 2012, 01:57:04 PMThe commentary from Tower and Warthog are overboard, especially from a US serviceman where I'd expect more from.  There are a number of people in the administration and fans that don't like the makeup of our teams and it has nothing to do with race but you would think with Warthog's comments that race is driving it.  Unfortunate that he is choosing those words as they paint many Marquette loving people incorrectly. 

We simply repeated your,,errr, Chicos words

Previous topic - Next topic