collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by Zog from Margo
[May 24, 2025, 11:46:29 PM]


Congrats to Royce by DoctorV
[May 24, 2025, 10:38:33 PM]


Let's talk about the roster/recruits w/Shaka by Jay Bee
[May 23, 2025, 08:31:14 PM]


Pearson to MU by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[May 23, 2025, 08:12:08 PM]


2026 Bracketology by Jay Bee
[May 23, 2025, 07:56:46 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

bamamarquettefan

I haven't looked back to see which is a more accurate predictor, but hopefully it's draftexpress rather than nbadraft.net.  Draftnet didn't have either in the draft or even in the top 50 seniors all year, before putting Jae in the 2nd round for a few weeks late.  However, they updated tomorrow and again have neither going.

http://www.nbadraft.net/2012mock_draft

Draft Express has had DJO in all year, and added Jae late.  Now they still have both as pretty solid, with DJO as the 38th pick and Jae as the 42nd pick of 60.

http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-mock-draft/2012/

Hoping Draft Express is right!
The www.valueaddsports.com analysis of basketball, football and baseball players are intended to neither be too hot or too cold - hundreds immerse themselves in studies of stats not of interest to broader fan bases (too hot), while others still insist on pure observation (too cold).

brewcity77

Really surprised neither is going to Portsmouth. It worked so well for JFB last year, seems like it could really benefit those guys as well. Clearly they're more confident of their chances than nbadraft.net is.

martyconlonontherun

nbadraft.net is pretty bad and is only so big because they are good at listing names and have an awesome site name. Draft Express does a real good job.

I wouldn't be surprised to DJO to go undrafted he seems like an undersized, 1-tool player. Don't get me wrong, hell of a college player, but I just don't see it translating. Jae I would draft in the second but I don't think he will break a 8-man rotation in the NBA. Hope I'm wrong.

Skitch

Quote from: brewcity77 on April 06, 2012, 06:58:59 PM
Really surprised neither is going to Portsmouth. It worked so well for JFB last year, seems like it could really benefit those guys as well. Clearly they're more confident of their chances than nbadraft.net is.

Can you just decide to go there or is this an invite only type thing?

martyconlonontherun

Quote from: Skitch on April 06, 2012, 09:35:39 PM
Can you just decide to go there or is this an invite only type thing?
Invite, but I think Crowder turned it down.

Dreadman24

Thats no big deal. They will both be drafted im pretty confident about that.

Ellenson Guerrero

Has anyone been able to find any data on the number of second round picks that end up making a roster by the end on training camp. I know that many have noted the potential benefits of going undrafted rather than second round but what are the chances of second rounders actually making the roster? Obviously many teams take foreigners with potential in the second round, but you could factor international players out.
"What we take for-granted, others pray for..." - Brent Williams 3/30/14

DavantesInferno

Quote from: martyconlonontherun on April 06, 2012, 10:46:33 PM
Invite, but I think Crowder turned it down.

What is usually a player's reasoning for turning down the Portsmouth?

DomJamesToTheBasket

Quote from: bringbackwarriors on April 07, 2012, 12:52:06 AM
What is usually a player's reasoning for turning down the Portsmouth?
The belief that they don't need to elevate their stock to be invited to the combine.  If you are likely to get drafted,  you are invited to the combine.  Those that are on the bubble often attend Portsmouth to prove their worthiness of attending the combine.  Likewise,  others on the bubble choose not to attend Portsmouth because without an exceptional showing,  they risk losing an invite to the combine.  Scouts don't take the Portsmouth very seriously at all.  The stands are a ghost town after the first 1-2 days.  DJO and Jae are taking a risk as no-shows,  but they are high profile players that should be invited to the combine without excelling at Portsmouth.

The Equalizer

Quote from: martyconlonontherun on April 06, 2012, 08:49:15 PM
nbadraft.net is pretty bad and is only so big because they are good at listing names and have an awesome site name. Draft Express does a real good job.

And

Quote from: bamamarquettefan on April 06, 2012, 05:34:34 PM
I haven't looked back to see which is a more accurate predictor, but hopefully it's draftexpress rather than nbadraft.net.  Draftnet didn't have either in the draft or even in the top 50 seniors all year, before putting Jae in the 2nd round for a few weeks late.  However, they updated tomorrow and again have neither going.

I dedcided to take a look at the final 2011 mock drafts in both Draft Express and NBADraft.net.

First, there is no basis to the comment that NBADraft.net is bad and Draft Express is better.

NBA Draft net accurately predicted 26 of the 30 first round picks as first rounders, and 50 of the 60 overall picks
Draft express accurately predicted 25 of the 30 first round picks, and 51 of 60 overall.

Both mocks had some variation from the actual draft positions.  For example, both thought Valanciunas wild be the #4 pick--he actually went 5th. Both mocks had only 10 players each predicted at their exact draft position. The average variation between the prediction and the actual was 4.28 for NBAdraft.net and 5.70 for Draft Express.

Using 2011 data I'd give a VERY slight edge to NBADraft net, but its really nsigificant.

For both mock drafts, virtually all the mistakes on players in/out of the draft were on players late in the 2nd round. 9 of the 10 players NBADraft.Net missed were beteween 50 and 60.  Draft Express was slighly better among their last 10 predictions, but slightly worse between 40 and 50 (preditcing 3 players in that range that weren't drafted at all).

The worst mistake by NBAdraft net was predicting Bogdanovic at #49 overall.  He went 31st overal.
The worst mistake by DraftExpress was predicting Cory Joseph at 50th overall--he went 29th.

So I don't think one can conclude anything from these two comparisions.  The biggest thing to keep in mind is that these mocks will change--the ones to look at will be the final ones just before the draft. 

bamamarquettefan

Thank you for figuring that out - I will keep looking at both equally based on your evidence.  Based on that, it's probably unusual that they would have such different opinions on Jae and DJO.  I am guessing this is based on the fact that both pass the eye test and put up NBA-worthy numbers BUT both are obviously undersized for their position.  It still seems to me that DJO has a better shot than Jerel because while short for his position, he is certainly strong enough to play a 2. 

I am hoping Jae skipped Portsmouth because he got some great feedback after dominating the east-west all-star game and figured he could play any better than that performance - so why not just let that stand - but that is a complete guess.  Obvoiusly being 6-6 is a problem for Jae as a front line player, but if scouts feel he can guard most 2, 3, or 4 in the league, then he seems to be a solid pick who gives you something, whether or not he is in the normal 8-man rotation.
The www.valueaddsports.com analysis of basketball, football and baseball players are intended to neither be too hot or too cold - hundreds immerse themselves in studies of stats not of interest to broader fan bases (too hot), while others still insist on pure observation (too cold).

Otule's Glass Eye

I read nbadraft.net, draftexpress and the espn draft pages regularly and it seems like draft.net copies espn.

RawdogDX

Quote from: The Equalizer on April 07, 2012, 11:41:54 AM
And

I dedcided to take a look at the final 2011 mock drafts in both Draft Express and NBADraft.net.

First, there is no basis to the comment that NBADraft.net is bad and Draft Express is better.

NBA Draft net accurately predicted 26 of the 30 first round picks as first rounders, and 50 of the 60 overall picks
Draft express accurately predicted 25 of the 30 first round picks, and 51 of 60 overall.

Both mocks had some variation from the actual draft positions.  For example, both thought Valanciunas wild be the #4 pick--he actually went 5th. Both mocks had only 10 players each predicted at their exact draft position. The average variation between the prediction and the actual was 4.28 for NBAdraft.net and 5.70 for Draft Express.

Using 2011 data I'd give a VERY slight edge to NBADraft net, but its really nsigificant.

For both mock drafts, virtually all the mistakes on players in/out of the draft were on players late in the 2nd round. 9 of the 10 players NBADraft.Net missed were beteween 50 and 60.  Draft Express was slighly better among their last 10 predictions, but slightly worse between 40 and 50 (preditcing 3 players in that range that weren't drafted at all).

The worst mistake by NBAdraft net was predicting Bogdanovic at #49 overall.  He went 31st overal.
The worst mistake by DraftExpress was predicting Cory Joseph at 50th overall--he went 29th.

So I don't think one can conclude anything from these two comparisions.  The biggest thing to keep in mind is that these mocks will change--the ones to look at will be the final ones just before the draft. 


Great post.  Shows how teams do crazy things at the end of the first round.  A lot of reaches happen.

Previous topic - Next topic