collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 7/15/25 by JTJ3
[Today at 03:31:05 PM]


Nash Walker commits to MU by Nukem2
[Today at 01:21:14 PM]


More conference realignment talk by WhiteTrash
[Today at 12:16:36 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by Shaka Shart
[Today at 01:36:32 AM]


Marquette freshmen at Goolsby's 7/12 by BCHoopster
[July 09, 2025, 10:13:46 PM]


Kam update by MuggsyB
[July 09, 2025, 02:51:24 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

LloydMooresLegs

22 throws down, onslaught coming.  I'll just start by asking how did MU do from 70 to 73 against those 16 ranked teams?   Pretty damn good. 

marqfan22

class of 73 was 9-7 vs. ranked opps.

Winning % is overrated.

MUMac

Quote from: marqfan22 on February 27, 2012, 10:48:14 PM
Class of 73 played against 16 ranked teams out of 126 opponents over four years.
After the Georgetown game, Class of 2012 will have played against 44 ranked teams out of 137 opponents over four years.

Marquette in the 70's is like today's Gonzaga in the WCC, except they made Final Fours and won.
One thing to remember, back in the '70's, it was the top 20.  Now, top 25.

DJO's Pump Fake

2009 #18, Inaugural Big East Season in 05, 3 amigos, first year of Buzz, what could have been with a  healthy DJ........I'll take it

PBRme

Pretty incredible any way you slice it that it takes to No 14 on the list to find a team without a player recruited by AL
Peace, Love, and Rye Whiskey...May your life and your glass always be full

2TimeWarrior

Quote from: Norm on February 27, 2012, 04:27:57 PM


Bottom 20
59. 1991 - 49-65, .430
58. 1966 - 47-60, .439
57. 1967 - 48-60, .444
56. 1965 - 48-59, .449
56. 1954 - 44-54, .449
54. 1990 - 54-60, .474
53. 1992 - 55-60, .478
52. 1989 - 58-57, .504
51. 1964 - 56-52, .519
50. 1993 - 62-53, .539
49. 2001 - 64-54, .542
48. 1988 - 65-53, .551
47. 1960 - 57-44, .564
46. 1957 - 58-44, .569
45. 1959 - 57-43, .570
44. 2002 - 70-50, .583
43. 1955 - 60-43, .583
42. 2000 - 71-49, .592
42. 1958 - 58-40, .592
40. 1968 - 66-45, .595

(By the way, the class of 2001 is the 21st best class right now, at 92-42, .687)


Am I just dense or is something amiss here?

DoubleMU0609


2TimeWarrior

Okay...that makes sense now.  I was just hoping that my Class of '01 numbers were somehow improved ;)

Norm


MarqBB77-03

"When I'm losing, they call me nuts. When I'm winning, they call me eccentric."  Al McGuire

Previous topic - Next topic