Main Menu
collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by Mutaman
[Today at 12:27:23 AM]


Recruiting as of 7/15/25 by noblewarrior
[July 20, 2025, 08:36:58 PM]


NM by Uncle Rico
[July 20, 2025, 01:53:37 PM]


Scholarship Table by muwarrior69
[July 20, 2025, 11:09:38 AM]


MU @ TBT? by Uncle Rico
[July 20, 2025, 06:29:25 AM]


Open practice by jfp61
[July 19, 2025, 10:03:37 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

Canadian Dimes

After last night's performance I was just wondering if all the ignorant people that ripped him last week were going to rip him again today?

After all he only scored 3 points!!

ATL MU Warrior

Probably...that seems to be what people do here.

MileHigh

Defense doesn't win games...Offense does  ;)

MUBurrow

He's got the look of a guy who is slowly putting it all together. last year he improved what was already his bread and butter - attacking the rim and adjusting to the quickness and athleticism of the college game. this year he's starting to break into the other aspects of the game, and has begun consistently upping his stats in all facets of the game. There will be ups and downs, but he's starting to get it. Right now I think he projects to really blow up as an upper classman.  If he learns to combine the improvement arc he's on right now with proving to the Association that he can handle the point, he could really make some scouts salivate.

g0lden3agle

Vander has amazed me with his rebounding ability what seems like at least once a game.  There was a point in the second half where he got UP for a rebound.  A guard that's willing to mix it up down low on those boards is extremely valuable.  If he can continue the rebounds, steals, and assists, I honestly don't care about the points on his stat line as long as he isn't clearly forcing matters.

MerrittsMustache

Quote from: Canadian Dimes on November 29, 2011, 09:40:40 AM
After last night's performance I was just wondering if all the ignorant people that ripped him last week were going to rip him again today?

After all he only scored 3 points!!

Blue has an excellent all-around game. Unfortunately, as long as he has games where he doesn't score much, he's going to have his detractors.

WellsstreetWanderer

Right now he is not the first,second or third option to score but is doing everything else with hustle.
Playing his role to the Max

StillAWarrior

Quote from: MerrittsMustache on November 29, 2011, 10:22:44 AM
Blue has an excellent all-around game. Unfortunately, as long as he has games where he doesn't score much, he'is going to have his detractors.


Fixed that for you...this being the internet and all.  He could be the second coming of [insert name of once-in-a-lifetime collegiate talent] and there would be detractors.

Blue is a good one...and getting better.
Never wrestle with a pig.  You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.

Badgerhater

I recall a previous Madison Memorial guy who was not the center of the offense but did all the little things that needed to be done.  He ended up doing okay.

Silkk the Shaka

I also think it really went over most people's heads last year (or they willingly ignored the fact) that Blue was EXTREMELY young as a freshman.  The Big East is a huge step up physically from Wisconsin high school ball.  Kids' bodies develop so rapidly around that time that he was and is still behind on that curve.  Give him another off season under Todd Smith while developing his jumper and some dribble-drive moves and I think he'll explode on the offensive end next year.  Regardless, he's contributing at a high level in all aspects of the game other than outside shooting right now, and he gives max effort on the court.

Just for a quick comparison, Todd Mayo has looked very competent on the offensive side of the ball thus far.  However, he's MORE THAN A FULL YEAR older than Vander, despite the fact that he's a freshman and Vander's a sophomore.  This should really be Vander's freshman year and Mayo's sophomore year.  Keep that in mind when watching Vander's progression.

GGGG

Quote from: Jamailman on November 29, 2011, 10:55:00 AM
Just for a quick comparison, Todd Mayo has looked very competent on the offensive side of the ball thus far.  However, he's MORE THAN A FULL YEAR older than Vander, despite the fact that he's a freshman and Vander's a sophomore.  This should really be Vander's freshman year and Mayo's sophomore year.  Keep that in mind when watching Vander's progression.


Really?  I didn't realize that. 

Silkk the Shaka

Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on November 29, 2011, 10:56:37 AM

Really?  I didn't realize that. 

Yep.  Todd will turn 21 during the NCAA tournament this year.  I turned 21 the spring of my junior year.  That's what happens when you go to prep school.

Another point of comparison - the U18 USA national team Vander started on included some big names like Austin Rivers and Quincy Miller - both freshmen at Duke and Baylor this year.

reinko

Quote from: Badgerhater on November 29, 2011, 10:53:06 AM
I recall a previous Madison Memorial guy who was not the center of the offense but did all the little things that needed to be done.  He ended up doing okay.


MerrittsMustache

Quote from: Jamailman on November 29, 2011, 11:01:36 AM
Yep.  Todd will turn 21 during the NCAA tournament this year.  I turned 21 the spring of my junior year.  That's what happens when you go to prep school.

Another point of comparison - the U18 USA national team Vander started on included some big names like Austin Rivers and Quincy Miller - both freshmen at Duke and Baylor this year.

I turned 21 in November of my senior year. Mayo is going to be 21 as a freshman! Granted I was very young for my class but still. That's insane!

Canadian Dimes

#14
I will say this for he hundreth time....

The reason Wisconsin has been so historically bad in basketball ( i beleive the second worst all-time record, only ahead of Northwestern) is because Wisconsin high school basketball is absolutely horrendous.  The yound ones will not recall that before Bo Wisconsin went about 50 years without an NCAA bid and perrennially fought with NW for last place in the BIG 10.  

In fact one would be hard pressed to find many if any states in the country with worse high school talent.  Now i realize many Wisconsinites will find this hard to beleive or accept but it is true.  

Hence Wisconsin has always had a roster of mostly wisconsin players and over the years there best players by and large have not been from Wisconsin.

MU has had some Wisconsin players but the difference makers from wisconsin have been few and far between.  Majority of Mu starters and greats have been from out East or Illinois.

Therefore, it is a simple truth that players from Wisconsin having had for the most part poor coaching and playing against woeful talent are not as prepared as those players from New York, Chicago, Indiana, etc.   Bo redshirts them.  Buzz does not play them as Freshman.  

Highly rated recruits from Calvin rayford to brian Butch to Evan Anderson to Scott Christopherson, Anthony Pieper, Jeronne MAymon and Vander Blue have had basketball culture schock upon entering D1.

Does not mean they dont have ability or talent.  It just means scoring 30 a game aginst dairy farmers doesnt really mean jack.  The learning curve is greater and some of them turn out to be really fine players and some of them simply scored alot of points against kids that would not be varsity basketball players in surrounding states and therefore got over recruited.

lab_warrior

Quote from: Badgerhater on November 29, 2011, 10:53:06 AM
I recall a previous Madison Memorial guy who was not the center of the offense but did all the little things that needed to be done. His father also played basketball and was not crazy, and his mother was a track star.  He ended up doing okay.

Specificity...accomplished. 


In all seriousness, though, I think Vander is exactly what the CrackedSidewalks peeps are saying he is going to be, some hybrid/"alpha" PG/SG type.  Both he and Junior are doing a great job facilitating the offense.  As long as he brings it on D, rebounds, and has good TO:AST numbers, we're going to win a lot of games. 

GB Warrior

Vander is looking more and more like the type of player I want on the court at all times, whether it's as another guard, or sliding over to Cadougan's spot.

GGGG

Quote from: Canadian Dimes on November 29, 2011, 11:14:55 AM
I will say this for he hundreth time....

The reason Wisconsin has been so historically bad in basketball ( i beleive the second worst all-time record, only ahead of Northwestern) is because Wisconsin high school basketball is absolutely horrendous.  The yound ones will not recall that before Bo Wisconsin went about 50 years without an NCAA bid and perrennially fought with NW for last place in the BIG 10. 


Actually, they broke that streak under Stu Jackson...then Dick Bennett...

ErickJD08

#18
I ripped Blue's offensive skills... And I still do. I will say this once and a bunch more times. Having the god given athletic ability to drive past guys doesn't do any good if you can't finish and you don't make great decisions. He is a great defender and he seems to be getting better.

Unfortunately/fortunately, if I create the hypothetical that there is a MU player slashing into the lane and it can be any player, who would it be? I would want it to be DJO, Jae, JC, Mayo, and Jones over blue in that order.

If there is a MU player pulling up for a J, who would you want?

Honestly, I am not anti-blue. I just call it like I see it.
Wanna learn how to say "@#(@# (@*" in a dozen languages... go to Professor Crass www.professorcrass.com

GGGG

But yesterday he made numerous good decisions in the half-court offense. 

PuertoRicanNightmare

Quote from: Canadian Dimes on November 29, 2011, 11:14:55 AM
I will say this for he hundreth time....

The reason Wisconsin has been so historically bad in basketball ( i beleive the second worst all-time record, only ahead of Northwestern) is because Wisconsin high school basketball is absolutely horrendous.  The yound ones will not recall that before Bo Wisconsin went about 50 years without an NCAA bid and perrennially fought with NW for last place in the BIG 10.  

In fact one would be hard pressed to find many if any states in the country with worse high school talent.  Now i realize many Wisconsinites will find this hard to beleive or accept but it is true.  

Hence Wisconsin has always had a roster of mostly wisconsin players and over the years there best players by and large have not been from Wisconsin.

MU has had some Wisconsin players but the difference makers from wisconsin have been few and far between.  Majority of Mu starters and greats have been from out East or Illinois.

Therefore, it is a simple truth that players from Wisconsin having had for the most part poor coaching and playing against woeful talent are not as prepared as those players from New York, Chicago, Indiana, etc.   Bo redshirts them.  Buzz does not play them as Freshman.  

Highly rated recruits from Calvin rayford to brian Butch to Evan Anderson to Scott Christopherson, Anthony Pieper, Jeronne MAymon and Vander Blue have had basketball culture schock upon entering D1.

Does not mean they dont have ability or talent.  It just means scoring 30 a game aginst dairy farmers doesnt really mean jack.  The learning curve is greater and some of them turn out to be really fine players and some of them simply scored alot of points against kids that would not be varsity basketball players in surrounding states and therefore got over recruited.
What is your point here? Telling us why Blue was bad last year?

Vander had a nice game last night. 3 points, 9 rebounds and 7 assists (and 3 turnovers) against Jacksonville. Not sure that's grounds for putting his jersey in the rafters just yet. Let's get some perspective. Matthews was from Wisconsin and he was FAR superior to Blue his freshman year. So was Diener. It took Novak until the DePaul game, but when he was a freshman he made the all regional team in the NCAA tournament. All of these guys were from Wisconsin.


Silkk the Shaka

Quote from: PuertoRicanNightmare on November 29, 2011, 12:06:53 PM
What is your point here? Telling us why Blue was bad last year?

Vander had a nice game last night. 3 points, 9 rebounds and 7 assists (and 3 turnovers) against Jacksonville. Not sure that's grounds for putting his jersey in the rafters just yet. Let's get some perspective. Matthews was from Wisconsin and he was FAR superior to Blue his freshman year. So was Diener. It took Novak until the DePaul game, but when he was a freshman he made the all regional team in the NCAA tournament. All of these guys were from Wisconsin.



Diener was 19 years, 8 months of age when he started his freshman year.  Matthews was 19 years, one month of age when he began his freshman year.  Blue was 18 years, 3 months of age when he began his freshman year.  If you don't think a year or more of physical maturity matters at that point in bball players' development then I don't know what to tell you.

Novak was the same age, but he was just as bad on defense as Blue was on offense as a freshman.  He just happened to get ridiculously hot in that Missouri game.

If you compare Blue this year to Diener and Matthews as freshmen, I think you'll get a better perspective on Blue.

PuertoRicanNightmare

Quote from: Jamailman on November 29, 2011, 12:23:21 PM
Diener was 19 years, 8 months of age when he started his freshman year.  Matthews was 19 years, one month of age when he began his freshman year.  Blue was 18 years, 3 months of age when he began his freshman year.  If you don't think a year or more of physical maturity matters at that point in bball players' development then I don't know what to tell you.

Novak was the same age, but he was just as bad on defense as Blue was on offense as a freshman.  He just happened to get ridiculously hot in that Missouri game.

If you compare Blue this year to Diener and Matthews as freshmen, I think you'll get a better perspective on Blue.
This is meaningless. Of course a 19 year old is going to be more physically mature than an 18 year old. What difference does it make? You can't change his age. All you're doing is admitting Blue was physically overwhelmed last year, which is what some of us have been saying since last January. I don't care if he was 21 or 12. He shouldn't have been playing as many minutes as he did.

MU82

Even when he was 25 -- and even when he tried to grow a beard -- Diener had the baby face and skinny body of a 14-year-old. That didn't stop him from being a tough SOB during his MU days.

Hoping Blue continues to improve. I like what I'm seeing so far this season.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Canadian Dimes

#24
Quote from: ErickJD08 on November 29, 2011, 11:53:00 AM
I ripped Blue's offensive skills... And I still do. I will say this once and a bunch more times. Having the god given athletic ability to drive past guys doesn't do any good if you can't finish and you don't make great decisions. He is a great defender and he seems to be getting better.

Unfortunately/fortunately, if I create the hypothetical that there is a MU player slashing into the lane and it can be any player, who would it be? I would want it to be DJO, Jae, JC, Mayo, and Jones over blue in that order.

If there is a MU player pulling up for a J, who would you want?

Honestly, I am not anti-blue. I just call it like I see it.

dont mean to be harsh but that is a really low basketball IQ statement.  Players are judged on how they can affect an outcome.  Vander Blue starts for 2 years now becuse he is one of the 5 guys on the team that most help us do that.  

here's one...if you most needed a dunk who would it be Derrick Wilson on Jamil Wilson...

If you most needed someone to dribble end to end who would it be todd mayo or Chris otule?

Those are dumb.  

We had 3 guys score double digits....ONLY 3!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and we scored 88 points.  Not all 5 players need to be big time scorers on a good basketball team.  The sooner a player and a team realize that the sooner they can get down to winning.

There is a ton more to basketball and being a good player than scoring!!!  

and while I am sure you are resolute in your beliefs,  the stats actually contradict with them.

Previous topic - Next topic