collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Buzz Cut by Newsdreams
[Today at 09:38:32 PM]


We May Be In Serious Trouble by BM1090
[Today at 09:32:26 PM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by MuggsyB
[Today at 08:36:44 PM]


It’s Time to Think Bold by Uncle Rico
[Today at 08:35:41 PM]


MU/🐢 🐢 Game Thread by GoldenEagles03
[Today at 08:32:21 PM]


2025 Transfer Portal by Newsdreams
[Today at 08:31:55 PM]


Let's talk defense by MuggsyB
[Today at 06:59:09 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


shiloh26

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/7177921/the-beginning-end-ncaa

This debate has kind of gotten lost amongst the discussion of conference realignment, but at their core, both issues are all about the money that college athletics makes and how it is to be shared.  If you have any interest in the debate, its a pretty provocative article and it certainly takes a stance on the issue.  I'm not sure the analogy to the baseball free-agency fight is a one-to-one comparison, but I think its an interesting article on the issue, raises some interesting points, and points out that the current stipend that Mark Emmet is throwing around doesn't really have a logical end point.

Regardless of how you feel about it, the landscape of college athletics is certainly changing.  The Ed O'Bannon case is quietly gaining steam, especially in light of NFL players gaining the right to be compensated for the use of their likenesses (in video games, etc), and the decline of amateurism pretty much everywhere else in sports (Tennis, the Olympics).  The sanctity of amateurism is not on the pedestal it once was.  Conference realignment has the limelight now, but the payment of college athletes is still going to be a major topic in the next few years.   

Previous topic - Next topic