collapse

Resources

25-26 SOTG Tally

2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross6
James Jr4
Parham1
Stevens1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Open practice by JakeBarnes
[Today at 12:44:00 AM]


2026-27 Depth Chart by Jay Bee
[July 23, 2026, 10:40:00 PM]


Best College Player You've Seen vs MU? by MuggsyB
[July 23, 2026, 08:50:34 PM]


1977 Championship 50th Anniversary (New Uniform) by TallTitan34
[July 23, 2026, 01:04:45 PM]


Big East offseason news by Billy Hoyle
[July 23, 2026, 12:10:08 PM]


Shaka interview with Rothstein by muwarrior69
[July 23, 2026, 11:45:16 AM]


Summer workouts by MuMark
[July 23, 2026, 10:35:50 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  NA

Marquette
87
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 2026
TV: NA
Schedule for 2025-26
Xavier
89

bamamarquettefan

http://ncaabbs.com/showthread.php?tid=515398

Wow, in combing through items looking for the apparent suddenness of the Pitt and Syracuse defections, I found this the best read.  Seems like this poster was pretty on top of things from past posts.  Obviously I cannot verify any of his sources, etc., but he seemed to put the pieces together better than any other explanation.  If this is true, it would certainly make it hard to argue that MU having football would have put us in a stronger possession.  A long and very interesting read, but the key paragraphs for me were:

FROM LINK:
Until this past year, Pitt was 100 percent committed to the future of the Big East and I would argue that no president has fought harder for the league than has Nordenberg. However I would say that the school's belief in the league and its future began wane last spring over the whole Villanova debacle.

Adding VU for football just was - and remains - among the very the dumbest ideas in the history of major college athletics and I think it shocked, alarmed and disappointed Pitt that so many other schools fought so hard to implement it and that so many other football schools were willing to leak it to the press (cough, Louisville, cough South Florida) in an effort to pressure Pitt into capitulating. Incidentally I believe that West Virginia and Rutgers hold the exact same view on the matter but you will have to ask them.

Pitt wanted to add Central Florida but was willing to settle for East Carolina and maybe even Houston. However as the process dragged along it became clear that some of the football schools and just about all of the basketball schools - minus ND, which always manages to stay above the fray in these matters - were not going to allow any package of teams in the league that did not include Villanova. Pitt (and West Virginia and Rutgers) just couldn't understand that mentality and that caused a deep rift.

END LINK
Why Nova moving up was different from UConn I don't know, but I just can't see that MU football would have been a key to being part of a merger.  Believe we are still bound to St. John's, Nova and Gtown.
The www.valueaddsports.com analysis of basketball, football and baseball players are intended to neither be too hot or too cold - hundreds immerse themselves in studies of stats not of interest to broader fan bases (too hot), while others still insist on pure observation (too cold).

Previous topic - Next topic