My friends and I were talking/debating about programs like MU. I'm talking about history, facilities, national reputation, campus, alumni, attendance, conference, TV, etc.
I guess I'm just trying to think like a free agent coach.... where would I like to go.
I think in 1999 when Crean took over, I think MU was realistically on par with:
Xavier
Dayton
SLU
DePaul (even though Depaul was very good those couple of years)
Creighton (MU was probably a little better than)
Miami of Ohio (MU was probably a little better than)
Flash forward to 2007... I think that list has changed a lot
MU has improved greatly in the following areas:
Facilities
Conference
National Rep (final 4 improved that a TON)
Famous alumni (Dwyane, Diener, Novak, Matthew Lesko)
Television contract
Nike Contract
Overall visibility
I think MU is now roughly on par with:
Georgetown (obviously they are still on the rise, and have as much if not more history than MU)
St John's (they have been down, but that program is a sleeping giant if they ever commit themselves to winning)
Villanova
Seton Hall
Pitt? (I don't exactly know everything about their program)
Purdue? (I know they aren't great record wise, but obviously the program has good potential)
Iowa? (see purdue)
Notre Dame (MU is probably a little better than ND right now)
Stanford? (I don't know enough about this program)
What do you guys think? Am I underrating or overrating MU? Obviously I'm biased because I went to MU and I'm currently a season ticket holder, but I'm trying to look at this objectively.