Main Menu
collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 7/15/25 by Zog from Margo
[Today at 04:17:40 PM]


Nash Walker commits to MU by Captain Quette
[Today at 02:40:11 PM]


Marquette freshmen at Goolsby's 7/12 by majorgoolsbys
[Today at 02:08:45 PM]


Congrats to Royce by tower912
[July 10, 2025, 09:00:17 PM]


Kam update by seakm4
[July 10, 2025, 07:40:03 PM]


More conference realignment talk by WhiteTrash
[July 10, 2025, 12:16:36 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by Shaka Shart
[July 10, 2025, 01:36:32 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

ATL MU Warrior

Ners, do yourself a favor and just put him on ignore like everybody else.

bilsu

Last year's team was also on the ropes until MU won three straight road overtime games. Butler hit two game winning shots that year. Hayward had his strengths and also had weaknesses. Hayward was more likely to force a shot and if he was shut down on the inside he would start jacking threes. I think this team would have been better if DJO averaged two less shots and Butler averaged two more.

Marquette84

Quote from: ATL MU Warrior on May 10, 2011, 09:19:32 PM
Ners, do yourself a favor and just put him on ignore like everybody else.

What makes you think Ners has everyone else on ignore?


brewcity77

Quote from: Marquette84 on May 10, 2011, 11:54:14 PMWhat makes you think Ners has everyone else on ignore?

While we sometimes disagree, I'm personally just not one for the universal ignore. It seems to me that people use message boards for two primary reasons. The first is to gain information and engage in civil discourse. The second is to reinforce their own viewpoint. I like to see myself as the former. Don't get me wrong, I like thinking I'm right, but if someone else thinks otherwise, I'd rather hear it than put my fingers in my ears and shout "I can't hear you!"

Marquette84

Quote from: brewcity77 on May 11, 2011, 12:01:20 AM
While we sometimes disagree, I'm personally just not one for the universal ignore. It seems to me that people use message boards for two primary reasons. The first is to gain information and engage in civil discourse. The second is to reinforce their own viewpoint. I like to see myself as the former. Don't get me wrong, I like thinking I'm right, but if someone else thinks otherwise, I'd rather hear it than put my fingers in my ears and shout "I can't hear you!"

I agree with you on this.  I know we've disagreed in the past--but you don't turn every disagreement into a personal attack, and I appreciate that.

What I can't understand the the hit-and-run nature of some of theses posts.  The preceding interaction on the comparative match-ups with Stanford versus Missouri is a perfect example.  Ners wanted to make the argument that the only reason someone would say Stanford is a tougher matchup than Missouri was because he wants to believe I hate Buzz. 

I replied with what I thought was a rational, factual basis for my opinion. I am also open to hearing his argument--yet when I asked for his reasoning that Missouri was just as tough a matchup as Stanford, there's no reply. 


Previous topic - Next topic