collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Marquette vs Oklahoma by TallTitan34
[Today at 12:00:27 PM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by wadesworld
[Today at 11:06:52 AM]


Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by MUbiz
[Today at 11:00:37 AM]


Nov 28: MU vs OU in Chicago by Warrior of Law
[Today at 10:10:18 AM]


Pearson to MU by willie warrior
[May 13, 2025, 06:07:05 PM]


Mid-season grades by Jay Bee
[May 13, 2025, 02:05:55 PM]


Kam update by MUbiz
[May 13, 2025, 01:53:14 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


GGGG

On the one hand, that was a real dumb mistake.

On the other, at least she had the guts to stand up in front of the media and admit that she was at fault.

Coleman

I don't really understand what happened....can you fill me in?

GGGG

Apparently the State provides an access database (!!) to input all voting results.  The City of Brookfield was the last to report so she entered the data, but didn't save the updated file.  So when she initially reported the results, it was without Broofield's data.

They caught the mistake today during the canvassing process.  They have both access files, and the voting machine tapes corresponds with the updated database.  So there is obviously no fraud...but really.

And can't the state have a better voting system than access?

augoman

the initial numbers are tallied by computer, and she thought she had added the Brookfield numbers- but they failed to tally.  The 'certified' numbers are not released until they are 'canvassed', and that is when they discovered that the Brookfield numbers were missing.  The Democrats' observer (vice-chairman of the Democratic party) was at the presser and said that the facts are exactly as stated, happened as stated, not 'found' votes, etc.

augoman


Goose

Wow...good news for Prosser. Glad to hear it!

4everwarriors

So, did Kloppenberg undeclare victory?
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

augoman


Blackhat

brookfield runs this state.   don't ever forget.

Goose


WellsstreetWanderer

Not like the Minnesota official who "found" more ballots in her car trunk, this sounds legit

NavinRJohnson


Quote from: elephantraker on April 07, 2011, 09:56:35 PM
Not like the Minnesota official who "found" more ballots in her car trunk, this sounds legit

Correct. This is not a case of 'found' votes. They were simply not included in the unofficial (and meaningless) numbers reported to the media on election night.

Badgerhater

Which soul-crushing Marquette loss would rival the pain felt by the Kloppenburg side?

--Stanford-2008
--Missouri-2009
--Washington-2010
--Louisville-2011

Hards Alumni

Quote from: Badgerhater on April 08, 2011, 11:22:57 AM
Which soul-crushing Marquette loss would rival the pain felt by the Kloppenburg side?

--Stanford-2008
--Missouri-2009
--Washington-2010
--Louisville-2011

Probably none since she was an underdog from the outset.

ZMovieman

I agree that this isn't a 'lost ballots' issue, but she does seem to be pretty inept at her job. She was receiving auditing recommendations because of moving tallying systems from county computers to personal computers in her office. I really don't think there's anything fishy here, but doing this in her position opens itself up to unneeded questions. Or am I offbase here?

MUMac

Quote from: Hards_Alumni on April 08, 2011, 11:26:45 AM
Probably none since she was an underdog from the outset.

Other than Washington, we were underdogs as well.  In each case, near the end it seemed like we might win.

MUMac

Quote from: ZMovieman on April 08, 2011, 11:41:14 AM
I agree that this isn't a 'lost ballots' issue, but she does seem to be pretty inept at her job. She was receiving auditing recommendations because of moving tallying systems from county computers to personal computers in her office. I really don't think there's anything fishy here, but doing this in her position opens itself up to unneeded questions. Or am I offbase here?

The whole process in how we vote and tally them needs to be reviewed, IMHO.  I agree with your comments.  I wonder how many times things like this happen, but since it is immaterial to the outcome - it goes unnoticed.  This one was pretty significant, and shines a light on the process.

PBRme

Quote from: Hards_Alumni on April 08, 2011, 11:26:45 AM
Probably none since she was an underdog from the outset.

Kentucky 2003
Peace, Love, and Rye Whiskey...May your life and your glass always be full

Chicago_inferiority_complexes

Quote from: Hards_Alumni on April 08, 2011, 11:26:45 AM
Probably none since she was an underdog from the outset.

Not based on the amount of money spent on that race!

MUBurrow

I hate that we vote for supreme court justices anyway. the whole thing is philosophically flawed.

Hards Alumni

Quote from: warrior07 on April 08, 2011, 02:43:47 PM
Not based on the amount of money spent on that race!

If money won races, Carly Fiorina and Meg Whitman would have government jobs.

🏀

Quote from: MUBurrow on April 08, 2011, 03:21:29 PM
I hate that we vote for supreme court justices anyway. the whole thing is philosophically flawed.

+1

4everwarriors

Klop on, Klop off
Klop on, Klop off
The Klopper  ;D
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

wyzgy

sloppykloppy was probably the favorite because of all the national goonion $$ support and looked at as a referendum against scott walker, but she was passed over for judgeship appointments by both diamond jimmy and obutthead.  some were saying brookfield held out purposely waiting for an 11th hour surprise from the kloppensheim team.  this way they could see their 2500 and raise them 7500 ;D 

Skatastrophy

Quote from: wyzgy on April 08, 2011, 07:34:59 PM
but she was passed over for judgeship appointments by both diamond jimmy and obutthead.   

Who?  You're a little too creative with nicknames and you lost me :)

Previous topic - Next topic