Author Topic: Could this be a win and still no SOTG? (Read 4362 times)

NCMUFan · « **Reply #1 on:** February 09, 2011, 08:24:10 PM »

Crowder hit some huge 3's. Crowder=SOTG IMHO.

downtown85 · « **Reply #2 on:** February 09, 2011, 08:24:30 PM »

Crowder was a stud today.

Blackhat · « **Reply #3 on:** February 09, 2011, 08:25:53 PM »

Crowder. He's probably got the most heart on the team. Some of these other guys are just scared out there....guys blame goes on Buzz, players take on the coach's attitudes.

Mr. Nielsen · « **Reply #4 on:** February 09, 2011, 08:27:55 PM »

Crowder and Butler. Fulce with 10 points in the first half.

TallTitan34 · « **Reply #5 on:** February 09, 2011, 08:28:54 PM »

Huge three by Crowder at the end of the game.

DegenerateDish · « **Reply #6 on:** February 09, 2011, 08:32:51 PM »

I nominate Stan Heath. If he doesn't call that timeout, MU losses this game in OT.

Tugg Speedman · « **Reply #7 on:** February 09, 2011, 08:33:20 PM »

Quote from: MUDish on February 09, 2011, 08:32:51 PM

I nominate Stan Heath. If he doesn't call that timeout, MU losses this game in OT.

+1

Milkshakes · « **Reply #8 on:** February 09, 2011, 08:35:38 PM »

Fulce. Played a good game. His defense was all we had for a while.

Mr. Nielsen · « **Reply #9 on:** February 09, 2011, 08:37:04 PM »

MU goes to overtime, I think USF would've won the game.

DiaperDandy · « **Reply #10 on:** February 09, 2011, 08:38:22 PM »

Fulce is the Star, hands down. Without him we don't stand a chance IMO. He came off the bench and really provided some stability to a struggling MU lineup. His senior leadership was big for us tonight.

Silkk the Shaka · « **Reply #11 on:** February 09, 2011, 08:39:57 PM »

How about Crowder's dagger threes? Those were back-breakers, reminiscent of Butler vs. 'Cuse

mklenn · « **Reply #12 on:** February 09, 2011, 08:41:20 PM »

JFB carried us in the 2nd half he was the difference.

MUBurrow · « **Reply #13 on:** February 09, 2011, 08:44:21 PM »

unpopularly, I say Vander. I dont think this game is ever close enough for Jae's threes to be remembered without VB's energy in the beginning of the second half. i know he put up some questionable shots and forced the issue a bit, but he did so when no one else would. his energy alone carried us for awhile in the second half, and he was the only one with a jump in his step in the first half. I thought he responded extremely well to the extra PT tonight.

21Jumpstreet · « **Reply #14 on:** February 09, 2011, 08:47:06 PM »

Quote from: MUBurrow on February 09, 2011, 08:44:21 PM

unpopularly, I say Vander. I dont think this game is ever close enough for Jae's threes to be remembered without VB's energy in the beginning of the second half. i know he put up some questionable shots and forced the issue a bit, but he did so when no one else would. his energy alone carried us for awhile in the second half, and he was the only one with a jump in his step in the first half. I thought he responded extremely well to the extra PT tonight.

Well put, I am a big fan of Blue tonight. Poor shooting, yes, absolutely. Almost every other aspect of his game tonight was good. He definitely made a positive impact on the win.

BrewCity83 · « **Reply #15 on:** February 09, 2011, 09:54:21 PM »

Crowder.

However, Fulce played the farthest above his normal contribution tonight. Therefore, I could vote for him for SOTG.

Tugg Speedman · « **Reply #16 on:** February 09, 2011, 09:55:52 PM »

Quote from: 21Jumpstreet on February 09, 2011, 08:47:06 PM

Well put, I am a big fan of Blue tonight. Poor shooting, yes, absolutely. Almost every other aspect of his game tonight was good. He definitely made a positive impact on the win.

+1

Hopefully this game helps him turn around.

GO_MU02 · « **Reply #17 on:** February 09, 2011, 10:07:31 PM »

Joe Fulce. He was working his tail off and without his first half points, the comeback would have been out of reach.

Also, agree on the Stan Heath post. Man was I glad he called timeout!

Skatastrophy · « **Reply #18 on:** February 09, 2011, 10:29:32 PM »

Fulce was a workhorse tonight. Not a flashy line, but he played a ton more minutes than he normally is asked to against an active USF front line.

Daniel · « **Reply #19 on:** February 09, 2011, 10:32:58 PM »

I vote Crowder too. Aggressive and hit 4 -5 threes.....

Markusquette · « **Reply #20 on:** February 09, 2011, 10:33:44 PM »

Quote from: BrewCity on February 09, 2011, 09:54:21 PM

Crowder.

However, Fulce played the farthest above his normal contribution tonight. Therefore, I could vote for him for SOTG.

this

Markusquette · « **Reply #21 on:** February 09, 2011, 10:34:03 PM »

post messed up lol delete the doubles

brewcity77 · « **Reply #22 on:** February 09, 2011, 10:35:11 PM »

My vote goes to Fulce. Did a lot to keep us alive early on, and frankly he deserves at least one SOTG in his senior season. Maybe not the "right" reason to give it to him, but dammit, he deserves it. A true Warrior in every sense of the word.

tower912 · « **Reply #23 on:** February 10, 2011, 06:46:11 AM »

Fulce. Without him, the deficit would have been larger. The only one in the first half who actually looked awake.

chren21 · « **Reply #24 on:** February 10, 2011, 07:34:52 AM »

I could go Fulce or our fearless leader, Jae

News:

'23-'24 SOTG Tally

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Please Register - It's FREE!

Next up: The long cold summer

Author Topic: Could this be a win and still no SOTG? (Read 4362 times)