collapse

Resources

Stud of Albany Game

Chase Ross

15 points, 4 rebounds,
5 assists, 5 steals,
26 minutes

2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

SOTG by Uncle Rico
[Today at 10:47:06 AM]


Nash Walker commits to MU by Scoop Snoop
[Today at 10:43:12 AM]


[Cracked Sidewalks] Southern Preview by GoldenEagles03
[Today at 10:00:43 AM]


[Paint Touches] Marquette Minutes Projections for 2026 by tower912
[Today at 07:56:20 AM]


Albany game chat by tower912
[Today at 07:03:28 AM]


Game day 2 by CountryRoads
[Today at 06:24:09 AM]


MU's Team Speed by tower912
[Today at 04:59:16 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Southern

Marquette
80
Marquette vs.
Southern
Date/Time: Nov 5, 2025, 7:00pm
TV: ESPN+
Schedule for 2025-26
Albany
53

ToddRosiakSays

MU not interested in Lucious
               




While the hometown ties set the stage for speculation, don't look for former Milwaukee Pius star Korie Lucious to wind up in a Marquette Golden Eagles uniform.

               

http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/115530639.html
               

MU_Iceman

That puts the speculation to rest...now why don't we focus on more pressing needs...like 5-6 more conference wins to close out the regular season...

MuMark

As always good job by Rosiak to get the inside scoop.

brewcity77

Best news I've heard all day. Really glad we won't be pursuing him, I wish him the best, but just don't think he's a good fit at Marquette.

Lennys Tap

#4
As suspected, "interest" was all on Korie's part.

tower912

Never seemed like a good fit or a good idea.    I am glad it all turned out to be much ado about nothing. 
In honor of Pope Leo XIV,
Matthew 25: 31-46

T-Bone

To egg on from the other thread...  "Dave Singleton, a walk-on transfer from High Point, can also play the position, and will be a junior next season."
;D
I'm like a turtle, sometimes I get run over by a semi.

79Warrior

Quote from: T-Bone on February 08, 2011, 09:46:52 AM
To egg on from the other thread...  "Dave Singleton, a walk-on transfer from High Point, can also play the position, and will be a junior next season."
;D

We have no idea how Singleton will play at this level. I would not count on too much.

Warrior1969

Great news..those of you thinking Singleton will play any significant minutes unless two guys in front of him get hurt are nuts.  He looked good in the summer league?...Remember how good a lot of the guys looked?....  hasn't transfered into the season at all.  If Ewill, JC, JJ, Blue, Gardner are having trouble seeing the floor, what on earth makes you think DS will?  Look at things realistically instead of with blue and gold sunglasses on.

tower912

Singleton...returning in front of him we have Blue, Cadougan, DJO, and Jones.    Unless Buzz signs another guard, preferably a highly ranked JUCO combo guard, or JJ really steps up his defense and works on his handle,  Singleton had BETTER be able to give us something.   I don't anticipate our incoming freshman playing a lot.     A 6'3 combo guard with (admittedly low) D1 experience doesn't look so bad as a back up plan. 
In honor of Pope Leo XIV,
Matthew 25: 31-46

T-Bone

Ugh. 
I have my thoughts on Singleton on the other Lucious thread.  I brought it up here because Rosiak mentioned it in his article. 

I think our starting PG for the next two years will be Cadougan, with D. Wilson (haven't seen him at all) backing him up, and the possibility of Blue getting minutes at the point.  It would be a nice surprise if Singleton is good enough next year to warrant some minutes as additional backup.  He very well *could* be.  Seriously, re-read the part about *could*.  I can't believe how many times that's been missed. 

So, let's look at it this way:  If Wilson is not ready as a freshman (and very well might not be) to spell Junior at PG next season, who will be that guy?  As I said above, I think Blue will get some time, but he'll need to work on his skills in that position.  And I think Buzz will get Junior whipped into better shape than he's ever been in his life to get his minutes up, but after that...
I'm like a turtle, sometimes I get run over by a semi.

warthog-driver

Quote from: T-Bone on February 08, 2011, 11:29:47 AMIt would be a nice surprise if Singleton is good enough next year to warrant some minutes as additional backup.  He very well *could* be. 

Sartorially, Singleton is a team leader. The man knows his clothes He prefers a classic look and is therefore no stranger to Mr. Ralph Lauren.

brewcity77

Either way, Lucious wouldn't help us next season. Looking at next year, my guess is that we will primarily go with 2-guard sets, with Cadougan, DJO, and Blue getting the lion's share of the time. I trust that all three of them will be at least competent next year. Then we have Wilson and Singleton to pick up the additional minutes. In addition, Jones may need to help out in the backcourt if pressed, most likely at the 2. I think we'll be okay with that rotation, though any significant injuries to the first three names could leave us in a world of hurt.

rocky_warrior

Quote from: brewcity77 on February 08, 2011, 05:45:43 PM
Cadougan, DJO, and Blue getting the lion's share of the time. I trust that all three of them will be at least competent next year. Then we have Wilson and Singleton to pick up the additional minutes. In addition, Jones may need to help out

Juan Anderson, while tall (getting taller?) sounds like he could play the 2 as well.  I mean, if you throw Jones into the "guard" category, then JA belongs there as well.

ChicosBailBonds

I was mostly surprised how few people were concerned about his multiple suspensions and behavior as a reason to just say no.  Seems more people were worried about his ability to play.

Just win baby

GGGG

Quote from: brewcity77 on February 08, 2011, 05:45:43 PM
Either way, Lucious wouldn't help us next season. Looking at next year, my guess is that we will primarily go with 2-guard sets, with Cadougan, DJO, and Blue getting the lion's share of the time. I trust that all three of them will be at least competent next year. Then we have Wilson and Singleton to pick up the additional minutes. In addition, Jones may need to help out in the backcourt if pressed, most likely at the 2. I think we'll be okay with that rotation, though any significant injuries to the first three names could leave us in a world of hurt.


My guess is that we largely have the same rotation as now, with Jones taking Buycks spot...Wilson taking Butler's...and Williams taking Fulce's.

Of course Jones won't be getting Buycks' minutes...

groove

#16
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on February 10, 2011, 11:38:20 PM
I was mostly surprised how few people were concerned about his multiple suspensions and behavior as a reason to just say no.  Seems more people were worried about his ability to play.

Just win baby

+1
I agree with your concerns. Seems like an attitude that seems more prevalent lately on this board, with threads wondering how good we would be with Mbakwe. I hope the attitude isn't one that starts at the top. Would hate to see Buzz take the path of Huggins and just win baby. But hey, once you take little steps like recruiting guys who have already committed to other schools, you can easily find yourself taking bigger steps and sleaziness becomes blurry.

MU B2002

Quote from: groove on February 11, 2011, 08:22:31 AM
+1
I agree with your concerns. Seems like an attitude that seems more prevalent lately on this board, with threads wondering how good we would be with Mbakwe. I hope the attitude isn't one that starts at the top. Would hate to see Buzz take the path of Huggins and just win baby. But hey, once you take little steps like recruiting guys who have already committed to other schools, you can easily find yourself taking bigger steps and sleaziness becomes blurry.


If you look at the Mbakwe thread you would see that most everyone agreed we don't want him here, and it was simply 1 poster's question.

And you are the second person that i have seen refer to "recruiting guys who have already committed to other schools"  Source for this?
"VPI"
- Mike Hunt

ChicosBailBonds

Quote from: MU B2002 on February 11, 2011, 01:20:38 PM

If you look at the Mbakwe thread you would see that most everyone agreed we don't want him here, and it was simply 1 poster's question.

And you are the second person that i have seen refer to "recruiting guys who have already committed to other schools"  Source for this?

Vander Blue comes to mind

MU B2002

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on February 11, 2011, 01:28:57 PM
Vander Blue comes to mind


Ok, so (a) Vander said we kept recruiting him after he committed, or (b) are you saying he is someone we continued to recruit after he verballed to Bucky?
If (b), source?

And note: not trying to pick arguments, I just want to read this info from another source than a message board.
"VPI"
- Mike Hunt

NavinRJohnson

#20
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on February 11, 2011, 01:28:57 PM
Vander Blue comes to mind

You mean the same Vander Blue who de-committed from UW in May, and committed to MU in October? That Vander Blue? Who else comes to mind?

By that standard, Tom Crean was recruiting Nick Williams while he was committed to Marquette. Does that make you squirm?

warthog-driver

Quote from: NavinRJohnson on February 11, 2011, 01:34:15 PM
You mean the same Vander Blue who de-committed from UW in May, and committed to MU in October? That Vander Blue? Who else comes to mind?

By that standard, Tom Crean was recruiting Nick Williams while he was committed to Marquette. Does that make you squirm?

The vacation is over...

GGGG

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on February 11, 2011, 01:28:57 PM
Vander Blue comes to mind


I don't care.  He simply verballed.  It's still open season after a verbal IMO.

ChicosBailBonds

Quote from: MU B2002 on February 11, 2011, 01:33:03 PM

Ok, so (a) Vander said we kept recruiting him after he committed, or (b) are you saying he is someone we continued to recruit after he verballed to Bucky?
If (b), source?

And note: not trying to pick arguments, I just want to read this info from another source than a message board.

Yes, MU kept recruiting him after he verballed to UW-madison (through various back channels).  A practice we shunned years earlier when it happened to us with Billingsley, etc.   

Sources?  Do you want me to link a newspaper article?  Can't do that because it doesn't exist.  Are there 50 people at both MU and UW that can confirm this happened with absolutely no hesitation at all.  Yes, and many at MU are no longer concerned about it.  They chalk it up as part of college basketball today....part of the process that exists.  No one likes it, but the feeling is that you have to do it.   

Some honest brokers here will confirm this, if they are being honest and not playing games with who the poster is but rather the merits of what has been stated. 


chapman

http://community.sportsbubbler.com/blogs/iwbs_sports_blog/archive/2009/10/18/vander-blue-commits-to-marquette.aspx

Quote"When he first got the job as Marquette's head coach I was the first player he called. But when I committed to Wisconsin, he honored that and never called me again."

Too bad we can't extend the shame of calling 17 year old kids liars to our own current players, not when the ever powerful "back channels" say otherwise..

Previous topic - Next topic