collapse

Resources

Stud of Creighton Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Alumni by Galway Eagle
[Today at 01:36:03 PM]


How Shaka Can Save This Season by CountryRoads
[Today at 12:37:30 PM]


What would make you show Shaka the door in March? by MuggsyB
[Today at 12:24:08 PM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by Billy Hoyle
[Today at 10:55:38 AM]


Zaide Didn’t Travel With Team by Pakuni
[Today at 09:14:12 AM]


6th Year Players - Career Games Played by #UnleashMalik
[Today at 08:14:54 AM]


Marquette NBA Thread by MU82
[Today at 01:08:39 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

79Warrior



I certainly hope so. I think this game is a better matchup for us than Pitt. Here's hoping the students can give the team a lift.

AlienWarrior

Yes , I was at the Rutgers game and this team is quick and will defend. The quality wins will come....

PE8983

Nothing I love more than beating ND.  That said, I think we lose.  If you think Pitt can shoot it, wait til ND comes to town.  If it ends up a half court game, we lose, and it won't be close.

MuMark

ND makes 49% of their 2's and 38% from 3.

Pitt makes 53% of their 2's and 38% from 3.

ND is good....Pitt is better.

PE8983

The problem with that argument is that Pitt shoots about 17 threes per game, whereas ND shoots about 23 of them.  If they get open threes like we've been allowing all year, it won't even be close.

MuMark

Duke is a much better 3 point shooting team then ND and we didn't get blown out. Gonzaga is just as good...we lost by 3.

Vandy gets 31% of their points from 3...the same as ND...we lost by 1 on the road. UW gets 36% of their points from 3 and shoot it just as well as ND.....we lost by 3.

I suppose its possible we could get blown out but how many times does that happen to MU at home?

I expect it to be a close game.

Even good 3 point shooting teams have off games...especially on the road.

willie warrior

We absolutely must win this game for many obvious reasons, among them:
~~It is No Dick, who I absolutely hate
~~A ranked opponent, which we must get several of to do anything this year
~~Keeps us in the thick of things in BEast
~~At home--this is a game we should win--a loss shows we cannot handle quality teams even on our own floor, especially after UW loss
~~It is ND who have the most arrogant fan base in the country
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind. Rick Pitino: "You can either complain or adapt."

MuMark

Certainly we need the win.

ND is better then we are so not sure if I would say we should win even though it is at home.

Should be a competitive game between 1 excellent team and 1 good team.

Hopefully we can pull out a close one.

4everwarriors

Don't see it happenin'. Terrible match-up problems for MU with so many traditional players for ND.
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

karavotsos

Was thinking about the matchups, and this could be a game in which we don't need a big -- Gardner or Otule -- out there very often.  Abromaitis is their top rebounder.  Nash posts, but I would think Crowder is big enough to guard him in the post.  Butler is our best rebounder. 

Scott is their other big guy, and he didn't play last night.  I think that Butler and Crowder could handle Cooley.  I would think that we would be better defensively without Otule and Gardner getting spread out and exposed on the perimeter.  After yesterday, I'm still very concerned with perimeter d even without either big in there obviously, but I would be very afraid of either of them being exposed with the way Notre Dame spreads their offense.

Obviously, it puts a lot of pressure on Crowder to play big without fouling, but it's something he's got to learn to do. 

Mr. Nielsen

If we are all thinking alike, we're not thinking at all. It's OK to disagree. Just don't be disagreeable.
-Bill Walton

brewcity77

Quote from: karavotsos on January 09, 2011, 02:11:13 PM
Was thinking about the matchups, and this could be a game in which we don't need a big -- Gardner or Otule -- out there very often.  Abromaitis is their top rebounder.  Nash posts, but I would think Crowder is big enough to guard him in the post.  Butler is our best rebounder.

If we get a lead, however, that could lead to us seeing more of Gardner and/or Otule. Especially if their forwards are in foul trouble. They don't really have a dedicated center-type player, and teams lacking that have been the times that those guys really shone bright for us. Of course, the all-around talent on ND is much higher than that of South Dakota, Longwood, or Prairie View A&M, so it comes with more risk, but the reward could also be better than against a Pittsburgh or other team with more accomplished legitimate big men.

MuMark

Scott has a hamstring injury and will not play against us.

ND played very well last night without him.

MuMark

Quote from: PE8983 on January 08, 2011, 09:42:49 PM
The problem with that argument is that Pitt shoots about 17 threes per game, whereas ND shoots about 23 of them.  If they get open threes like we've been allowing all year, it won't even be close.

You were right....it wasn't close..... ;)

Previous topic - Next topic