collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[Today at 09:45:25 AM]


Congrats to Royce by DoctorV
[May 24, 2025, 10:38:33 PM]


Let's talk about the roster/recruits w/Shaka by Jay Bee
[May 23, 2025, 08:31:14 PM]


Pearson to MU by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[May 23, 2025, 08:12:08 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

MarquetteDano

I have only seen them play for about one half this year.  I did see them play zone in the game I was watching which scares me.   Rosiak mentioned they do not shoot the three well, which is very good news for us (poor at defending the three this year).   Looking at the Pomeroy numbers, looks like their offense isn't too good, which is just what the doctor ordered for our defense right now.  Also, they appear to send teams to the line quite a bit so I hope our free throw shooting is good.

I confess I don't know too much about their personnel other than Mitchell, who is pretty good.  Any thoughts on the keys to the game?

Golden Avalanche

Rice is typically a man coach. His guys switch every time though so it plays like a zone. They can go stretches where scoring is difficult. Certainly poor from the perimeter (which may be a recurring theme in the Big East). Dane Miller is the star. 6'7'' wing who plays in and out. Most dynamic. Biruta is getting better down low. Mitchell provides a steady presence. Beatty and Coburn are the predominant guards. Not deep. Will foul. Must take the free points to win. They prefer the slower pace so MU should come out like they did against WVU and push pace with lane jumping and traps. RU folded against UNC with that style.

rocky_warrior

I don't know much about them either - though I've been looking around at stats.  We have an edge in all the four factors except for TO% (but it's 18.4% RU vs 18.1%MU).  Further, MU is a 5.5 point favorite.

However, ever since MU played at the RAC for the blizzard game I've been scared of that place.

MarquetteDano

#3
Quote from: The Golden Avalanche on January 04, 2011, 05:33:46 PM
They prefer the slower pace so MU should come out like they did against WVU and push pace with lane jumping and traps. RU folded against UNC with that style.

Looks like even with the new coach the style is similar.  I remember with Hill Rutgers played a slow down game.  Have to ensure this does NOT turn into a fully half-court game like the Badger game did.  Looks like if we score 70 points we win in this one.

Question is:  how to ensure it doesn't turn into a half-court affair?  It seems like our mild press doesn't really do it as it just takes more time for the opponent to setup their offense.  Do we pick up defensively at 30 feet like we have in other games?  Has led to some easy baskets for opponents.

jsglow

Seems to me that our success can come off of jumping the passing lanes for steals and fast break points.  I love the overplay and for once we have enough skilled guys on the roster to do it.

Markusquette

At least we don't have to deal with Rosario anymore

Dawson Rental

Rutgers was pretty much playing only three guards, two seniors and a frosh who was spelling them both.  The frosh is out and scheduled to have knee surgery, so I expect that Buzz will be pressuring their guards.
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

MarquetteDano

Quote from: LittleMurs on January 04, 2011, 09:13:32 PM
Rutgers was pretty much playing only three guards, two seniors and a frosh who was spelling them both.  The frosh is out and scheduled to have knee surgery, so I expect that Buzz will be pressuring their guards.

Since Rutgers appears to have a thin frontline and they want to slow it down, maybe this could be a good game for Gardner to get 15+ minutes?  I know a lot of people have been clamoring for him to get minutes.  No better team than a slowdown team that doesn't have much depth?  And since Rutgers plays tough defense no better person (DG) than probably our most efficient offensive player.

Golden Avalanche

Quote from: MarquetteDano on January 05, 2011, 09:34:56 AM
Since Rutgers appears to have a thin frontline and they want to slow it down, maybe this could be a good game for Gardner to get 15+ minutes?  I know a lot of people have been clamoring for him to get minutes.  No better team than a slowdown team that doesn't have much depth?  And since Rutgers plays tough defense no better person (DG) than probably our most efficient offensive player.

Not only the efficiency aspect but Cookie Monster is so adept at creating foul situations that he could be vital tonight. At the worst, his space causes a tightening of the defense in the lane which should create room for the open 3 from DJO or penetration from Butler/Buycks.

Thinks its a really good match-up for MU tonight and if they keep their head, they could head into Pitt with a 2-0 record.

hairy worthen

Quote from: MarquetteDano on January 05, 2011, 09:34:56 AM
Since Rutgers appears to have a thin frontline and they want to slow it down, maybe this could be a good game for Gardner to get 15+ minutes?  I know a lot of people have been clamoring for him to get minutes.  No better team than a slowdown team that doesn't have much depth?  And since Rutgers plays tough defense no better person (DG) than probably our most efficient offensive player.

wait. If they are thin at guard and want to slow it down, wouldn't we then want an up tempo game. Not sure how dg is running the floor.

MarquetteDano

Quote from: hairyworthen on January 05, 2011, 10:03:31 AM
wait. If they are thin at guard and want to slow it down, wouldn't we then want an up tempo game. Not sure how dg is running the floor.

True.  That is the quandry.  If Rutgers forces a slow down game, Gardner should probably get some time.  We we are able to dictate the pace, then he probably is not the best guy to come in.

Previous topic - Next topic