collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: Encouraging  (Read 7367 times)

Ari Gold

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 938
  • L.H.I.O.B.
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #25 on: December 30, 2010, 12:40:10 AM »
chicos and Marquette09 are right

Buycks is still infuriating though. He can redeem himself with a good move on offence, but he turns the ball over way to often.

I still think 21-23 wins are achievable counting the BET

mug644

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1700
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #26 on: December 30, 2010, 12:52:50 AM »
I guess I did not think it through first.  Am still upset.  I think you are about one game off (I hope)...  I think we need 12.5 combined wins including the BE tourney.  .5 depends on if we can get some huge road wins against the top teams.

I think we are thinking along the same lines...and I, too, am upset at the missed opportunity at Vandy. It may not have been a must win, but it certainly would've been a valuable wins. As it now stands, we not only need wins, but we need valuable (read, on the road and/or over top teams) to feel any degree of comfort come Selection Sunday.

77ncaachamps

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8457
  • Last of the Warrior Class
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #27 on: December 30, 2010, 02:39:13 AM »
chicos and Marquette09 are right

Buycks is still infuriating though. He can redeem himself with a good move on offence, but he turns the ball over way to often.

But...but...he has the best A/TO ratio: 52 ast/ 25 TO

However, he DOES lead the team in TO: 2.3

Vander, 2.2
Cadougan, 1.8
DJO 1.7
Reggie 1.6

We're fracking cursed at the PG spot!
SS Marquette

Hards Alumni

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6680
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #28 on: December 30, 2010, 07:15:20 AM »
But...but...he has the best A/TO ratio: 52 ast/ 25 TO

However, he DOES lead the team in TO: 2.3

Vander, 2.2
Cadougan, 1.8
DJO 1.7
Reggie 1.6

We're fracking cursed at the PG spot!

It just goes to show, that if something is said enough times, people will believe it.

Dwight Buycks has been one of our top 2-3 players so far this year.

bilsu

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8825
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #29 on: December 30, 2010, 08:46:56 AM »
Preach it, Panther.

Last week, Georgetown looked like the best team in the league. Tonight, they looked very ordinary.

18 games is a long time. Buckle up.
You feel optimistic about that? We play Georgetwon once and Notre Dame twice. Notre Dame looked pretty good last night. Notre Dame beat Wisconsin on a neutral court and we lost to Wisconsin at home. Notre Dame beat us last year at Bradley center. Notre Dame is better this year than last year and we are not as good. You can argue all you want about how many wins we need to get into NCAA, but we should be arguing how many wins we need to get into NIT. That is 9-4, 7-11 and 1-1 for 17-16.

MarquetteDano

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3236
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #30 on: December 30, 2010, 09:28:24 AM »
It just goes to show, that if something is said enough times, people will believe it.

Dwight Buycks has been one of our top 2-3 players so far this year.

Agreed.  Great example of groupthink.  Everyone complains about Buycks however I would love to see DJO play point guard for 25 minutes this year... it would not be pretty.  How 'bout Cadougan playing the "2" spot... disaster.

Buycks has been playing out of position and has done a very good job.

willie warrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9598
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #31 on: December 30, 2010, 09:38:27 AM »
You feel optimistic about that? We play Georgetwon once and Notre Dame twice. Notre Dame looked pretty good last night. Notre Dame beat Wisconsin on a neutral court and we lost to Wisconsin at home. Notre Dame beat us last year at Bradley center. Notre Dame is better this year than last year and we are not as good. You can argue all you want about how many wins we need to get into NCAA, but we should be arguing how many wins we need to get into NIT. That is 9-4, 7-11 and 1-1 for 17-16.
Iif we go 17-16 and get an NIT invite, heads need to roll, within the NIT and MU. After all, "In Buzz we trust" He has his players and must be held accountable.

Why do we now have to look forward to an NIT invite with all the talent on the team?
Oh, I forgot, we are inexperienced, Buycks is playing out of position, DJO is in a slump, Gardner cannot play D, neither can Cadougan, Fulce has been injured, Crowder is playing out of position, yada, yada.
Every year we go through this bull crap. Time to start beating a respectable opponent and quit making excuses for Buzz.
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind.

Lighthouse 84

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2982
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #32 on: December 30, 2010, 09:40:15 AM »
But...but...he has the best A/TO ratio: 52 ast/ 25 TO

However, he DOES lead the team in TO: 2.3

Vander, 2.2
Cadougan, 1.8
DJO 1.7
Reggie 1.6

We're fracking cursed at the PG spot!

Fixed.  There's no one named Reggie on the team.
HILLTOP SENIOR SURVEY from 1984 Yearbook: 
Favorite Drinking Establishment:

1. The Avalanche.              7. Major Goolsby's.
2. The Gym.                      8. Park Avenue.
3. The Ardmore.                 9. Mugrack.
4. O'Donohues.                 10. Lighthouse.
5. O'Pagets.
6. Hagerty's.

🏀

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8469
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #33 on: December 30, 2010, 09:41:18 AM »
Iif we go 17-16 and get an NIT invite, heads need to roll, within the NIT and MU.

Seriously? You need to relax. You want Buzz fired for missing the NCAA in his third season?

willie warrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9598
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #34 on: December 30, 2010, 09:44:03 AM »
Seriously? You need to relax. You want Buzz fired for missing the NCAA in his third season?
You relax. I do not want us to finish 17-16.
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind.

🏀

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8469
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #35 on: December 30, 2010, 09:48:31 AM »
You relax. I do not want us to finish 17-16.

What are you going to do about it if we do? Write a letter?

Bad seasons happen.

willie warrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9598
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #36 on: December 30, 2010, 10:11:56 AM »
I expected Marquette this year to be only a roughly 60-40 shot at best to make the NCAA Tournament this year given the limited experience that so many guys in the playing rotation have.

Marquette isn't Duke or Kansas to where an NCAA Tournament invite should pretty much be a lock every year. We only returned Butler, DJO, and Buycks as guys who played a lot last year.

The biggest reason IMO that we haven't been better this year so far is that Cadougan hasn't developed quicker, thus we don't have a reliable and consistent true point guard to play 30 minutes or more a game.

For example, put Jordan Taylor on MU and give them Cadougan, it would significantly impact both teams. Buycks is a good kid, trying his hardest out there, and hasn't been terrible or anything like that, but he's simply not a natural PG. We badly need Cadougan to ASAP play to the level of his ranking as a recruit. In college ball, a quality PG to run the show is priceless.
Yes, there is the answer. Blame the entire season so far on cadougan's performance.
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind.

willie warrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9598
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #37 on: December 30, 2010, 10:13:48 AM »
What are you going to do about it if we do? Write a letter?

Bad seasons happen.
That is a good one. S&%t happens. It is just a bad season. But please do not expect better or want accountability.
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind.

🏀

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8469
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #38 on: December 30, 2010, 10:21:25 AM »
That is a good one. S&%t happens. It is just a bad season. But please do not expect better or want accountability.

What were your expectations for this season? Clearly, they were a bit too high.

I expected we would be 10-3 right now, so they are a game short by my standards.

For the record, my expectations for this team was to finish 20-13. Right now, I'm looking at 18-15.

nomorebuycks

  • Scholarship Player
  • **
  • Posts: 99
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #39 on: December 30, 2010, 10:34:03 AM »
The biggest problem is that Buzz misfired on Cadougan.  He's just not going to be as good as expected, and he was counted on to be a starter for the next 3 years. 

I just hope Gardner can keep his composure about his lack of playing time and doesn't get too down.


dw3dw3dw3

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 820
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #40 on: December 30, 2010, 11:15:56 AM »
The biggest problem is that Buzz misfired on Cadougan.  He's just not going to be as good as expected, and he was counted on to be a starter for the next 3 years. 

I just hope Gardner can keep his composure about his lack of playing time and doesn't get too down.


Actually a semi-logical post by you!

I think JC was a good recruit given the other options at the time, but I do think its clear that shooting (ala Diener, Acker) is the one equalizing quality you need from a non-athletic point guard, no matter how much they have won at the prep level. I think that its even more evident with this team, without many other outside or inside threats. Its difficult to play JC and VB together without them being a threat to knock down 3s.

Agree on Gardner, I would think he has to see the video and notice its him thats giving up those offensive rebounds. It seems like he's afraid to clear space when a shot goes up or just doesn't know how to yet.  I don't think Buzz is asking for much, shot blocking isn't necessary, challenging post moves isn't even necessary (CO just put his hands straight up for the most part last night), just don't give the other team a second chance. 

chren21

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 976
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #41 on: December 30, 2010, 11:21:17 AM »

Agree on Gardner, I would think he has to see the video and notice its him thats giving up those offensive rebounds. It seems like he's afraid to clear space when a shot goes up or just doesn't know how to yet.  I don't think Buzz is asking for much, shot blocking isn't necessary, challenging post moves isn't even necessary (CO just put his hands straight up for the most part last night), just don't give the other team a second chance. 
Take a look at DG on your TVO or go to espn3.com and watch the replay.  Times to fast forward to below.

-10:47 DG in.
-9:42 Gardner gives up offensive rebound.  Watch him CLEARLY get beat down the court.  He starts off ahead of his man but gets beat to the block.  Results in Taylor putback from the lane. (21-17 vandy)
-9:13 DG gets beat down the floor AGAIN.  His man gets the offensive board and results in Tinsley hitting a 10 footer.
-8:51 OK defense by MU, shot from baseline bounces long and DG’s man gets the offensive rebound.  Tuff bounce.  DG gets pulled.


ErickJD08

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1602
    • Professor Crass
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #42 on: December 30, 2010, 11:38:07 AM »
Agreed Chicos. Our best performance of the year, closest we have come to 40 solid minutes. The team was clicking, everyone chipping in. Could Otule actually be for real?

Were we watching the same game?

I saw that we continue to struggle getting the defensive rebounds.  I saw our defense consistently giving up easy baskets.  I saw our team put up difficult shots and struggle to find the open man. 

I think we were lucky it to be in the game.  Their best shooter was cold (he was missing open shots) and a starter was out for them. 

The only encouraging thing I saw was that DJO looked to be getting in a little groove.  I saw some really pure shots from him.    If he picks up, we have a much better chance to make the tourney.

Wanna learn how to say "@#(@# (@*" in a dozen languages... go to Professor Crass www.professorcrass.com

MuMark

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4351
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #43 on: December 30, 2010, 11:57:52 AM »
Agreed encouraging performance in many ways.

As far as the NCAA people need to relax. Every year at this time people act like they know what will and won't get you in. Reality is its way too soon to tell. Last year ND was 10-2 in the non conference with a 14 point loss to Northwestern and a home loss to Loyola Marymount.

They had no quality wins.

They won 10 games in the conference and 2 in the BET.

They EASILY made the field as a 6 seed.

They won some big games(WVU, Pitt, GT, MU) and lost some clunkers to Rutgers, Nova(by 18), and CONN by 12.

I think we are improving......time to play the conference season and see what happens.

MarquetteDano

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3236
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #44 on: December 30, 2010, 12:05:38 PM »
Last year ND was 10-2 in the non conference with a 14 point loss to Northwestern and a home loss to Loyola Marymount.

They had no quality wins.

They won 10 games in the conference and 2 in the BET.

They EASILY made the field as a 6 seed.

They won some big games(WVU, Pitt, GT, MU) and lost some clunkers to Rutgers, Nova(by 18), and CONN by 12.

I think we are improving......time to play the conference season and see what happens.

Makes me feel better seeing N.D. resume from last year.  Calming down now.  Thanks Mark.

4everwarriors

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 16020
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #45 on: December 30, 2010, 12:22:18 PM »
Folks are spot in their evaluation of Cadougan. Past injury or no injury, I seen enough to feel comfortable saying that Buzz misses badly on him. Doesn't have point guard court IQ, quickness, stamina, or personality or moxie to be a starting BE lead guard. Oh, did I mention ZFFB could outshoot Jr.?
If Buzz could fix the point guard spot, it would change the entire season outlook for this team. BTW, Smith would not have been the answer either.
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

warriors1991

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 269
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #46 on: December 30, 2010, 12:47:01 PM »
1)I agree, for now, on Junior. He should be improving by now. Whenever he is in the game, he is overwhelmingly underwhelming. He just doesn't really do a whole lot of anything. Buycks right now is a far better PG than Junior. Still a long season but JC really has to start getting it done out there. Vander is not a point guard, nor is DJO.

2)I like Davante and his potential......on offense. On D, he's a massive liability. The few minutes he was in, I specifically watched him on D and it's almost like he's not even trying. He half-asses it out there, gets beat like a fourth grader for rebounds (doesn't even jump), then gets called for a foul and droops his shoulders and whines like somebody just shot his dog. I saw Jae look at him and yank him back into the team's huddle when he did that. He's really got to man up, get a spine, and start playing harder out there or he's going to sit for very long stretches. Say what you want about Buzz but if a kid on my grade school team acted like that on defense she'd be getting pulled just as fast as DG did.
And we need him so I hope he figures it out. Soon.

MUfan12

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5657
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #47 on: December 30, 2010, 12:47:53 PM »
Folks are spot in their evaluation of Cadougan. Past injury or no injury, I seen enough to feel comfortable saying that Buzz misses badly on him. Doesn't have point guard court IQ, quickness, stamina, or personality or moxie to be a starting BE lead guard. Oh, did I mention ZFFB could outshoot Jr.?
If Buzz could fix the point guard spot, it would change the entire season outlook for this team. BTW, Smith would not have been the answer either.

He's played *maybe* 20 games.

I'm willing to hold off judgment for a while yet.

GoldenWarrior

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 337
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #48 on: December 30, 2010, 12:52:19 PM »
Some of you need to slow down.

MU lost at DePaul in mid-January and turned it around to be a #6 seed. Notre Dame in March at senior day looked like a nit team and came back to beat MU and have a nice run to be a #6 seed. The Big East season hasn't even started.
I agree to an extent, but not having a single solid non-conference win will be a big red flag on our resume come March.

MUfan12

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5657
Re: Encouraging
« Reply #49 on: December 30, 2010, 12:56:51 PM »
I agree to an extent, but not having a single solid non-conference win will be a big red flag on our resume come March.

I just don't understand this line of thinking. They'll have at least 10 chances against top 50 RPI teams. They get some of those, and a couple against the big guns, and they'll be fine.

We're not Zags or Memphis, that have to schedule like that because of their conference. Quality wins are quality wins. Just avoid the bad losses and it'll be fine.

 

feedback