collapse

Resources

Stud of DePaul Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross5
James Jr4
Parham1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

James/Stevens by Jay Bee
[Today at 02:43:58 PM]


Tie brealks by MU Fan in Connecticut
[Today at 02:43:06 PM]


2026 Coaching Carousel by Tarragona
[Today at 02:40:34 PM]


Thank you, Ben and Chase by Galway Eagle
[Today at 02:28:11 PM]


Marquette Team Rankings by WhiteTrash
[Today at 02:17:46 PM]


Transfers in/out 2025-2026 by Zog from Margo
[Today at 01:55:44 PM]


Ian Miletic Interview by Scoop Snoop
[Today at 01:42:23 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  UConn

Marquette
78
Marquette vs
UConn
Date/Time: Mar 7, 2026, 11:30am
TV: Fox
Schedule for 2025-26
Providence
56

Where will MU be in the polls for the majority of this season?

Unranked
21 (14.5%)
Receiving Votes
83 (57.2%)
20-25
26 (17.9%)
15-20
10 (6.9%)
15 or higher
5 (3.4%)

Total Members Voted: 145

Coleman

Me and a couple others were talking about this on the board and just curious to hear everyones' opinion.

RJax55

I went with receiving votes.

MU has a good shot to be ranked early if they can win one in the CBE tournament in KC. Even if MU loses to Duke, the next night they will get either #3 Kansas State or #12 Gonzaga. I think a victory against either of them sneaks MU into the top 25.

willie warrior

I chose receiving votes. A win over Duke would push us up the ladder.
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind. Rick Pitino: "You can either complain or adapt."

Coleman

I also said receiving votes.

Question: If we run the table to KC, beat #1 Duke and #3 K-State, are we the new #1 the next week?

Very unlikely I know, but still we'd just have to pull off 2 quick wins on a neutral court. Not unthinkable.

MerrittsMustache

Quote from: Victor McCormick on October 29, 2010, 01:15:46 PM
I also said receiving votes.

Question: If we run the table to KC, beat #1 Duke and #3 K-State, are we the new #1 the next week?

Very unlikely I know, but still we'd just have to pull off 2 quick wins on a neutral court. Not unthinkable.

If MU did that, they'd probably debut in the polls in the low- to mid-teens.

Benny B

Quote from: Victor McCormick on October 29, 2010, 01:15:46 PM
I also said receiving votes.

Question: If we run the table to KC, beat #1 Duke and #3 K-State, are we the new #1 the next week?

Very unlikely I know, but still we'd just have to pull off 2 quick wins on a neutral court. Not unthinkable.

I think MU would have to run the table through Jan 22 or 29th to get a #1 ranking.  There's probably two or three voters that would put MU in the top 5 in the above scenario, but overall... my guess would be somewhere in the neighborhood of 9-15 at best.
Quote from: LittleMurs on January 08, 2015, 07:10:33 PM
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

GoldenWarrior

Quote from: Benny B on October 29, 2010, 02:29:22 PM
I think MU would have to run the table through Jan 22 or 29th to get a #1 ranking.  There's probably two or three voters that would put MU in the top 5 in the above scenario, but overall... my guess would be somewhere in the neighborhood of 9-15 at best.
+1

bilsu


romey

I put them in the receiving votes category, but I could see them popping into the 20-25 range a couple ti,es this year

Daniel

I voted Receiving Votes.  I think we have the talent to get ranked this year - we almost made it alst year as I recall.  My feeling is, if we are successwful early, we will get ranked.

TallTitan34


brewcity77

I voted for receiving votes. We got close a number of times last year. Had we held on against FSU we'd have been ranked, maybe even had we beat NC State. We had chances early in the Big East schedule, but lost key games against 'Nova and WVU that kept us just outside. Every time we got close, it seemed we would lose a game.

I think to be ranked this year, it's pretty simple. Early on, if we beat Duke or K-State and are competitive against the other team we should get into the rankings. If we lose both but come back to beat Wisconsin and Vandy, another good shot at being ranked. But if we come into the Big East schedule at 8-4, it'll be an uphill climb.

PGsHeroes32

The chances of it even happening are slim but if we are to run the table in non conference and have neutral wins vs duke and kstate along with a road win vs vandy and home vs wisco. We still would probably be only in that 6-10 range at best i think.
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

brewcity77

Quote from: HaywardsHeroes32 on November 01, 2010, 11:45:32 AM
The chances of it even happening are slim but if we are to run the table in non conference and have neutral wins vs duke and kstate along with a road win vs vandy and home vs wisco. We still would probably be only in that 6-10 range at best i think.

It would depend on who won and when. If we beat Duke and Kansas State on back-to-back nights, that alone would likely get us into the top ten. If we don't lose again through non-conference, there's every chance we could be a top five team when Big East play starts. That being said, us running the table in non-conference would be a titanic feat.

NersEllenson

My guess is that we will be ranked between 15 and 25 and the end of regular season play.  Projecting a 5 seed in NCAA.  Losing Lazar was big, and Mo Acker...but as much as I liked Cooby..don't think we'll miss him too much compared with our current roster options. 

Jae, Buycks, Fulce, Cadougan and Blue will determine how high this team can go.  We know Jimmy and DJO will be the stars..can these other guys replace what Lazar/Mo Acker gave us?  My guess is yes...and therefore I think we finish slightly better than last year.
"I'm not sure Cadougan would fix the problems on this team. I'm not even convinced he would be better for this team than DeWil is."

BrewCity77, December 8, 2013

mu_hilltopper


Previous topic - Next topic