collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Scouting Report: Ian Miletic by MU82
[Today at 02:36:17 PM]


What is the actual gap between Marquette and the top of the Big East by Vander Blue Man Group
[Today at 02:32:21 PM]


2026 Bracketology by MU82
[Today at 02:32:12 PM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by brewcity77
[Today at 02:30:54 PM]


Pearson to MU by MuMark
[Today at 11:11:57 AM]


Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by The Sultan
[Today at 08:41:12 AM]


NM by mu_hilltopper
[May 17, 2025, 03:51:26 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


mues05

These guys have MU ranked #330 in the nation....

http://www.forbes.com/lists/2010/94/best-colleges-10_Americas-Best-Colleges_Rank_14.html


...behind these other WI schools.  Ridonk.
#50. Lawrence
#125. Beloit
#152. St. Norberts
#184. Carroll
#195. Ripon
#212. Madison
#238. Wisconsin Lutheran

KipsBayEagle

Yea, they make these ridiculous rankings every year.  That list alone shows how dumb it is.

damuts222

Twitta Tracka of the Year Award Recipient 2016

reinko


4everwarriors

Don't expect a higher ranking when NLI aren't honored.
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

Lighthouse 84

If the Tanned One were still here, the rank would be much higher.
HILLTOP SENIOR SURVEY from 1984 Yearbook: 
Favorite Drinking Establishment:

1. The Avalanche.              7. Major Goolsby's.
2. The Gym.                      8. Park Avenue.
3. The Ardmore.                 9. Mugrack.
4. O'Donohues.                 10. Lighthouse.
5. O'Pagets.
6. Hagerty's.

mues05

That must be why they had Indiana ranked in front of us.

GGGG

Quote from: mues05 on August 12, 2010, 02:24:09 PM
These guys have MU ranked #330 in the nation....

http://www.forbes.com/lists/2010/94/best-colleges-10_Americas-Best-Colleges_Rank_14.html


...behind these other WI schools.  Ridonk.
#50. Lawrence
#125. Beloit
#152. St. Norberts
#184. Carroll
#195. Ripon
#212. Madison
#238. Wisconsin Lutheran


Seriously, under what kind of criteria would Lawrence be ranked as the tope school in Wisconsin?

ChicosBailBonds

Quote from: Lighthouse 84 on August 12, 2010, 03:55:06 PM
If the Tanned One were still here, the rank would be much higher.

This must be why Williams College is ranked number 1, because Buzz WILLIAMS is at Marquette

ChicosBailBonds


GGGG

Are you kidding?  These criteria are *awful*!!

22.5% of the rating is weighted to student evaluations from RateMyProfessor.com or MyPlan.com, but only 5% is on freshman to sophomore retention rates?

10% is from Alumni listed in Who's Who in America?  I mean...seriously????

and if 12.5% is about debt load on the student, and you have a bunch of small, private schools near the top of the list, you should probably realize its because rich family members are funding their education.

Complete joke.

Tom Crean's Tanning Bed

Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on August 12, 2010, 09:37:57 PM

10% is from Alumni listed in Who's Who in America?  I mean...seriously????


OK...I guess we all need to sign up Who's Who in America.  If enough of us do it, maybe we can jump 10 spots!
The General has taken on a new command.

🏀

Quote from: Tom Crean's Tanning Bed on August 12, 2010, 11:43:50 PM
OK...I guess we all need to sign up Who's Who in America.  If enough of us do it, maybe we can jump 10 spots!

I hope alumni like myself are all smarter than paying to be in Who's Who.

PBRme

Exactly, it should be a contra-indicator
Peace, Love, and Rye Whiskey...May your life and your glass always be full

mues05

This is how the ranking should be determined...
Female to Male ratio 5%
Attractiveness of Females 20%
Area Bars 25%
After Hours Eats 15%
Athletic Success 20%
Blow Off Classes Available (bowling, Golf, etc) 10%
Famous Alumni 5%

MUFC9295

You had to throw this "list" in the garbage even if after just a glance.  After discounting the gratuitous Stanford mention, the list had such an East (specifically, NE) bias its merits could not be defended.  I'm just surprised a seemingly well-respected publication like Forbes went for it.  Then again, now that I say that, isn't Forbes just known for E! and VH1-like "Top" lists.   

reinko

Quote from: marqptm on August 13, 2010, 05:36:42 AM
I hope alumni like myself are all smarter than paying to be in Who's Who.

Dude, who's who is the coolest.  Check out my profile pic.


g0lden3agle

Quote from: mues05 on August 13, 2010, 09:27:28 AM
This is how the ranking should be determined...
Female to Male ratio 5%
Attractiveness of Females 20%
Area Bars 25%
After Hours Eats 15%
Athletic Success 20%
Blow Off Classes Available (bowling, Golf, etc) 10%
Famous Alumni 5%

Where would we be on this list?

🏀

Quote from: g0lden3agle on August 13, 2010, 11:05:31 AM
Where would we be on this list?

Female to Male ratio 5% - Probably 4%
Attractiveness of Females 20% - Probably 10%
Area Bars 25% - Does Water Street count? Ricky's on State? 25%
After Hours Eats 15% - 15%
Athletic Success 20% - 10%
Blow Off Classes Available (bowling, Golf, etc) 10% - 2%
Famous Alumni 5% - 2%


So not well.

downtown85

another website that looks at core curiculum

http://www.whatwilltheylearn.com/

Marquette gets a B
Madison gets a D


GGGG

Any site that ranks Superior ahead of Madison should be looked at with some skepticism.

ATL MU Warrior

Quote from: downtown85 on August 15, 2010, 05:17:20 PM
another website that looks at core curiculum

http://www.whatwilltheylearn.com/

Marquette gets a B
Madison gets a D

Boy, not sure what that site really looks at.  Check these grades out:

Yale - F
Harvard - D
Princeton - C
Cal Berkeley - F

🏀

Quote from: ATL MU Warrior on August 15, 2010, 05:47:34 PM
Boy, not sure what that site really looks at.  Check these grades out:

Yale - F
Harvard - D
Princeton - C
Cal Berkeley - F

I read through their FAQ and these are some solid rankings. In a nutshell, the rankings are focused on core cirrculum requirements. Schools like Madison offer so many classes that can fulfill core requirements, students can get away with taking blow off classes. With such classes, this website states the student is not coming out of school with the basic skills they should.

Basically, you fulfill a requirement but you're not helping yourself with "The History of Television."

Ari Gold

Quote from: marqptm on August 15, 2010, 09:41:49 PM
I read through their FAQ and these are some solid rankings. In a nutshell, the rankings are focused on core cirrculum requirements. Schools like Madison offer so many classes that can fulfill core requirements, students can get away with taking blow off classes. With such classes, this website states the student is not coming out of school with the basic skills they should.

Basically, you fulfill a requirement but you're not helping yourself with "The History of Television."

You bite your tongue. John Grams is a great man, phenomenal prof. 

GGGG

Quote from: marqptm on August 15, 2010, 09:41:49 PM
I read through their FAQ and these are some solid rankings. In a nutshell, the rankings are focused on core cirrculum requirements. Schools like Madison offer so many classes that can fulfill core requirements, students can get away with taking blow off classes. With such classes, this website states the student is not coming out of school with the basic skills they should.

Basically, you fulfill a requirement but you're not helping yourself with "The History of Television."


Well, "the basic skills you should" is a pretty subjective statement.  Does the History of Western Civilization give you any more "basic skills" than the History of Television???  I mean, one gives you a better base of knowledge, but does it help you enough to where attending UW-Superior over UW-Madison is a good career option?

Previous topic - Next topic