collapse

Resources

Stud of St. John's Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1
Parham1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Portal by MarquetteMike1977
[Today at 10:47:21 AM]


157 minutes by onepost
[Today at 10:44:14 AM]


MU/ St.John’s game thread by Mu8891
[Today at 10:37:27 AM]


It’s Time to Think Bold by Viper
[Today at 10:27:43 AM]


The Nigel James Conundrum by Mu8891
[Today at 10:22:34 AM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by Billy Hoyle
[Today at 08:56:40 AM]


Golden Eagles vs Red Storm by NCMUFan
[Today at 06:56:13 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: @ DePaul

Marquette
68
Marquette @
DePaul
Date/Time: Jan 17, 2026, 7:30pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
St. John's
92

Aughnanure

“All men dream; but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.” - T.E. Lawrence

HouWarrior

Interesting-- with the rumor of 15 tx legislator baylorites trying to mess with texas schools' pac 10 joinder, the pac 10 apparently negated their influence/threat by clarifying colo gets pac 10 offer...not baylor.
This allows the other 5 (tx, TAMU,Tech,Okla,OKst)to accept, en masse, w/o any baylor string or hold up--smart move pac10.
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.

Dawson Rental

Quote from: houwarrior on June 10, 2010, 02:58:06 AM
Interesting-- with the rumor of 15 tx legislator baylorites trying to mess with texas schools' pac 10 joinder, the pac 10 apparently negated their influence/threat by clarifying colo gets pac 10 offer...not baylor.
This allows the other 5 (tx, TAMU,Tech,Okla,OKst)to accept, en masse, w/o any baylor string or hold up--smart move pac10.

I guess Delaney isn't the only genius in this game.
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

NYWarrior

Quote from: houwarrior on June 10, 2010, 02:58:06 AM
Interesting-- with the rumor of 15 tx legislator baylorites trying to mess with texas schools' pac 10 joinder, the pac 10 apparently negated their influence/threat by clarifying colo gets pac 10 offer...not baylor.
This allows the other 5 (tx, TAMU,Tech,Okla,OKst)to accept, en masse, w/o any baylor string or hold up--smart move pac10.

A brilliant move .... that, to some degree, also liberates A&M --- SEC?

CrazyEcho

Quote from: NYWarrior on June 10, 2010, 02:47:13 PM
A brilliant move .... that, to some degree, also liberates A&M --- SEC?

TAMU = Texas A & M University . . . they're going to the Pac-10.

NYWarrior

#5
Quote from: CrazyEcho on June 10, 2010, 02:50:07 PM
TAMU = Texas A & M University . . . they're going to the Pac-10.

Um, I know the abbreviation since I grew up in College Station.  The point is that with traditional Texas politics somewhat neutered in this instance by the PAC-10's brilliant move to sign CU on first, the Ags have a measure of freedom they did not have before.   It's not just me saying it, http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/andy_staples/06/10/aggies.options/index.html#?eref=sihp  Even Gene Stallings won't dismiss it, http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/longhorns/entries/2010/06/10/stallings_on_po.html?cxntfid=blogs_bevo_beat  Still, I think pressure to remain the little sister to UT will prevail, sadly.

For years Aggies have toyed with the idea of moving to the SEC, which they originally wanted to do before opting for the Big 12.  A&M is much more of a regional brand than UT(even in the Lone Star State -- the Aggies own East Texas in many respects) -- which is part of the reason LSU won't schedule A&M in the regular season anymore.

HouWarrior

Quote from: NYWarrior on June 10, 2010, 03:03:57 PM
Um, I know the abbreviation since I grew up in College Station.  The point is that with traditional Texas politics somewhat neutered in this instance by the PAC-10's brilliant move to sign CU on first, the Ags have a measure of freedom they did not have before.   It's not just me saying it, http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/andy_staples/06/10/aggies.options/index.html#?eref=sihp  Even Gene Stallings won't dismiss it, http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/longhorns/entries/2010/06/10/stallings_on_po.html?cxntfid=blogs_bevo_beat  Still, I think pressure to remain the little sister to UT will prevail, sadly.

For years Aggies have toyed with the idea of moving to the SEC, which they originally wanted to do before opting for the Big 12.  A&M is much more of a regional brand than UT(even in the Lone Star State -- the Aggies own East Texas in many respects) -- which is part of the reason LSU won't schedule A&M in the regular season anymore.
I agree. Aggies bitterly resent implication of automatically following UT. Sherrill tried to get LSU rivalry, but LSU let it fade, for reason you state. All that said, I am still guessing 60/40 that A &M will flirt more with SEC (not be able to deliver OU to SEC--which may be key), and it will "independently" announce its independent decision to join with the 5 in the Pac 10 east division.
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.


Previous topic - Next topic