collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

IU vs MU preview by Vander Blue Man Group
[Today at 12:16:21 PM]


Media Rights Update by bluebodega
[Today at 11:16:14 AM]


More conference realignment talk by The Sultan
[Today at 08:26:22 AM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[July 07, 2025, 11:14:59 PM]


To the Rafters by sodakmu87
[July 07, 2025, 09:29:49 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by brewcity77
[July 07, 2025, 02:10:17 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by Jay Bee
[July 07, 2025, 11:51:18 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

ToddRosiakSays

A closer look at MU moving forward, and Jae Crowder
               


While the commitment of Jae Crowder might have caught some off-guard with the Marquette Golden Eagles' apparent glaring need for more size on the interior, the feeling within the program is that the Howard College sophomore has both the game and frame to be able to step in and contribute immediately in the Big East next season.

At 6 feet 6 inches and 230 pounds, Crowder projects as someone who can play the 3, 4 and possibly even the 5 for MU. He also is, in many ways, a player similar to Lazar Hayward in that he’s big enough to bang around in the post and hold his own on the glass -- he’s averaging 9.5 per game -- yet still skilled enough to face up and have knocked down 26 three-pointers at a 37.1% clip to this point in the season.

While a big aircraft carrier would have been nice, those guys clearly don’t grow on trees, and Crowder was the next, best option. For those who question the addition of Crowder, ask yourself what you’d rather have: a guy like Crowder, who will more than likely come in and make an impact from the get-go and provide two productive years, or a big-man project like Chris Otule or Youssoupha Mbao who might or might not ever pan out years down the line?
               

http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/83582022.html
               

copious1218

I'm concerned that Crowder thinks he'll be playing the 2 or the 3.

Markusquette

Quote from: copious1218 on February 04, 2010, 03:52:49 PM
I'm concerned that Crowder thinks he'll be playing the 2 or the 3.

I think he would be content with a Lazar like role.  Playing more inside, hitting the glass, but also getting his fair share of open jumpers as long as he knocks them down.

Lighthouse 84

Quote from: SlappedButtocks on February 04, 2010, 03:50:13 PM
As always The Rose tells it like it is! he has framed it succintly. We are fortunate to have The Rose prowling the corridors in search of the true story. While not much to look at The Rose is so much better than Lori Nickles.
Sounds like you and TR arelikethis!
HILLTOP SENIOR SURVEY from 1984 Yearbook: 
Favorite Drinking Establishment:

1. The Avalanche.              7. Major Goolsby's.
2. The Gym.                      8. Park Avenue.
3. The Ardmore.                 9. Mugrack.
4. O'Donohues.                 10. Lighthouse.
5. O'Pagets.
6. Hagerty's.

chapman

He must have not seen our roster to even think the 2 spot.  2 or 3 thinking will be more like 4 or 5 in reality.

wyoMUfan

the people that post on jsonline are 90% idiots.
Thank GOD we have MUSCOOP!

The Pickle

"I've said it time and time again:  the impact big men who are out there wind up in two places:  North Carolina, Duke, Kentucky, and Texas."  So do they wind up in 2 places or maybe 4?

mu89

Quote from: The Pickle on February 04, 2010, 09:44:52 PM
"I've said it time and time again:  the impact big men who are out there wind up in two places:  North Carolina, Duke, Kentucky, and Texas."  So do they wind up in 2 places or maybe 4?

how clever. I think he meant big time programs then the nba. that could count as 2.

MU111

Quote from: wyoMUfan on February 04, 2010, 05:26:51 PM
the people that post on jsonline are 90% idiots.
Thank GOD we have MUSCOOP!

I have to say that it does get very frustrating reading a lot of the stuff that gets posted on JSOnline blogs.  I try to avoid reading the comments as much as possible now but it's almost like a train wreck-- you can't help but stop and stare.

PE8983

Have you seen the freshman big man from Marshall?  Did you watch the MU-Xavier game?
This myth that all big men end up at NC, Duke, etc... is just crap.

gumbyandpokey

Quote from: PE8983 on February 05, 2010, 10:52:18 AM
Have you seen the freshman big man from Marshall?  Did you watch the MU-Xavier game?
This myth that all big men end up at NC, Duke, etc... is just crap.

Nobody is asking for the best big men in the country.  Just a serviceable guy would be fine.  Play good defense, get key rebounds, etc.  But a 6'6 guy who wants to play the 2...you have got to be kidding.

esotericmindguy

Quote from: copious1218 on February 04, 2010, 03:52:49 PM
I'm concerned that Crowder thinks he'll be playing the 2 or the 3.

If he expects to play the 2/3 then he won't see the floor.  Blue, DJO, Buycks, Jones, Newbill will all fill that role.  I think he knows where he'll fit, and Haywards role this year was probably what closed the deal.

GOMU1104

Quote from: PE8983 on February 05, 2010, 10:52:18 AM
Have you seen the freshman big man from Marshall?  Did you watch the MU-Xavier game?
This myth that all big men end up at NC, Duke, etc... is just crap.

Todd is talking about the elite big men.

Did you know that Xavier's Jason Love was the 33rd ranked C in the 2006 class? He was behind guys like Bryce Webster and JP Gavinski, and only a couple spots ahead of Mitchell Carter.

Did you know Love played less than 5 mpg as a FR?

He developed over his 4 years...exactly the type of big men that most schools have to pursue. Hopefully O'tule and Mbao have this kind of upside.

NavinRJohnson

For those who question the addition of Crowder, ask yourself what you'd rather have: a guy like Crowder, who will more than likely come in and make an impact from the get-go and provide two productive years, or a big-man project like Chris Otule or Youssoupha Mbao who might or might not ever pan out years down the line?

Apparently, Todd doesn't read this board. If he did, clearly he would realize that there is a 3rd option which is a 6-11, 260 lb, Big East ready big man. For as long as Rosiak has been doing this, I would think he would know that those guys are just sitting out there this time of year, waiting for scholarship offers.

PE8983

Yeah, and when Love was a freshman, they had other big men that were playing the majority of the minutes.

GOMU1104

Quote from: NavinRJohnson on February 05, 2010, 12:06:11 PM
For those who question the addition of Crowder, ask yourself what you'd rather have: a guy like Crowder, who will more than likely come in and make an impact from the get-go and provide two productive years, or a big-man project like Chris Otule or Youssoupha Mbao who might or might not ever pan out years down the line?

Apparently, Todd doesn't read this board. If he did, clearly he would realize that there is a 3rd option which is a 6-11, 260 lb, Big East ready big man. For as long as Rosiak has been doing this, I would think he would know that those guys are just sitting out there this time of year, waiting for scholarship offers.

Teal?

NavinRJohnson


GOMU1104

Quote from: NavinRJohnson on February 05, 2010, 12:24:06 PM
I don't believe in using teal, but if you're asking the question, you get it.

Never know with some of the yahoos in here.

Litehouse

Quote from: NavinRJohnson on February 05, 2010, 12:06:11 PM
For those who question the addition of Crowder, ask yourself what you'd rather have: a guy like Crowder, who will more than likely come in and make an impact from the get-go and provide two productive years, or a big-man project like Chris Otule or Youssoupha Mbao who might or might not ever pan out years down the line?

This comment is a classic false dilemma fallacy, since those aren't the only two choices.  Crowder will contribute next year and we need him, that's great.  The real question is who would you rather have sitting on the bench next year, a 6th guard or a big-man project, neither of whom will see much playing time next year.  Personally, I'd rather take my chances with the project.

GOMU1104

Quote from: Litehouse on February 05, 2010, 12:54:45 PM
This comment is a classic false dilemma fallacy, since those aren't the only two choices.  Crowder will contribute next year and we need him, that's great.  The real question is who would you rather have sitting on the bench next year, a 6th guard or a big-man project, neither of whom will see much playing time next year. Personally, I'd rather take my chances with the project.

So you would like to have 3 projects on your roster?

kmwtrucks

I think the reason is when you look at the guys who are going to play the most minutes next year, and I'm kind of guessing.  our 3 tallest player's would be in bottom half.  With Junior, DJO, Dwight, Blue, Butler, Jae would be my guess for the Top 6 in minutes.  So having 2 (smith and DJ) guards to spell those 4 is maybe what he is thinking.  I have no problem running 3 guards. The hard part is when they are 5-7 and 5-10.  6-1, 6-3, 6-4 is much better for Def and rebounding.

AZWarrior

Quote from: GOMU1104 on February 05, 2010, 01:03:21 PM
So you would like to have 3 projects on your roster?

Your odds of having one develop into a stud big man increase by 50% with 3 vs. 2.
All this talk of rights.  So little talk of responsibilities.

Hards Alumni

Quote from: Litehouse on February 05, 2010, 12:54:45 PM
This comment is a classic false dilemma fallacy, since those aren't the only two choices.  Crowder will contribute next year and we need him, that's great.  The real question is who would you rather have sitting on the bench next year, a 6th guard or a big-man project, neither of whom will see much playing time next year.  Personally, I'd rather take my chances with the project.

You are stupid if you want 5 freshman next year.  Just stupid.

Keep the classes balanced.

GOMU1104

Quote from: AZWarrior on February 05, 2010, 02:20:48 PM
Your odds of having one develop into a stud big man increase by 50% with 3 vs. 2.

Why doesnt Buzz just bring in 6 projects then?

AZWarrior

Because you need a sufficient quantity of known good guards and wings.   ::)
All this talk of rights.  So little talk of responsibilities.

Previous topic - Next topic