collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: Today's ESPN Bracketology...  (Read 11338 times)

DJO's Pump Fake

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 574
Re: Today's ESPN Bracketology...
« Reply #25 on: March 02, 2009, 01:26:13 PM »
Purdue sucks.....don't they play in the Big Ten?

Norm

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2369
Re: Today's ESPN Bracketology...
« Reply #26 on: March 02, 2009, 01:27:06 PM »
Why is Purdue not a good matchup for Marquette? Are they an extremely tall team with huge centers and power forwards? Do they drain 3's all day long? I watched them play a little and don't see anything that scares me too much.

AlumKCof93

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 926
Re: Today's ESPN Bracketology...
« Reply #27 on: March 02, 2009, 01:35:25 PM »
Teams to fear in the Big 10 . . .

MSU and Purdue.  The rest of them, let's play.  These 2 are legit. 
"Yes, Dinnertime!  The perfect break between work and drunk" - Homer J. Simpson

GOMU1104

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1286
Re: Today's ESPN Bracketology...
« Reply #28 on: March 02, 2009, 01:39:06 PM »
Why is Purdue not a good matchup for Marquette? Are they an extremely tall team with huge centers and power forwards? Do they drain 3's all day long? I watched them play a little and don't see anything that scares me too much.

JaJuan Johnson - Athletic big man who we can't match up with.
Robbie Hummel - Drains 3s

Pretty solid guard play from Etwaun More, Keaton Grant, and Lewis Jackson

Not a gimme at all...there are definately better matchups that one could hope for.

Skatastrophy

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5569
  • ✅ Verified Member
Re: Today's ESPN Bracketology...
« Reply #29 on: March 02, 2009, 01:50:18 PM »
Teams to fear in the Big 10 . . .

MSU and Purdue.  The rest of them, let's play.  These 2 are legit. 

I'd rather play Purdue than most of the teams in the BE.  MSU, on the other hand, would not be a team I'd like to face.

GOMU1104

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1286
Re: Today's ESPN Bracketology...
« Reply #30 on: March 02, 2009, 01:52:20 PM »

Edited...I'm an idiot.
« Last Edit: March 02, 2009, 01:54:53 PM by GOMU1104 »

Badgerhater920

  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
Re: Today's ESPN Bracketology...
« Reply #31 on: March 02, 2009, 01:53:00 PM »
JaJuan Johnson - Athletic big man who we can't match up with.
Robbie Hummel - Drains 3s

Pretty solid guard play from Etwaun More, Keaton Grant, and Lewis Jackson

Not a gimme at all...there are definately better matchups that one could hope for.


6'10'' JuJuan Johnson is really the only matchup that bothers me a little bit but we've beaten teams with better big men this year and  Lazar plays bigger than him at 6'6''.
Beyond that, our guards are better even without Dom, Wes would abuse Hummel, and Jerel would beat up Moore.

Yes, the big 10 is overrated, but that's not really why I wouldn't mind playing Purdue in the 2nd round - any team that scores 49 on Iowa doesn't exactly terrify me.

Badgerhater920

  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
Re: Today's ESPN Bracketology...
« Reply #32 on: March 02, 2009, 01:53:44 PM »
You are more worried about Penn State, Illinois, Minnesota, and Wisconsin?

I think BE stands for Big East.

Coleman

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3450
Re: Today's ESPN Bracketology...
« Reply #33 on: March 02, 2009, 02:25:13 PM »
No one is saying Purdue would be easy. But I would take them over the top 6 teams in the Big East any day.

nola03

  • Guest
Re: Today's ESPN Bracketology...
« Reply #34 on: March 02, 2009, 02:32:06 PM »
Well, I just REASONED that out myself by finding that Purdue is actually not a good match up for us, and these jokers must be assuming they suck because they're in the Big Ten.

 ::)

The Man in Gold

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 539
Re: Today's ESPN Bracketology...
« Reply #35 on: March 02, 2009, 02:54:48 PM »
I'm more upset that Villanova with a loss this weekend at home to GU is a 3 seed.
Captain, We need more sweatervests!  TheManInGold has been blinded by the light (off the technicolor sweatervest)

AlumKCof93

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 926
Re: Today's ESPN Bracketology...
« Reply #36 on: March 02, 2009, 02:57:27 PM »
I think UConn and Pitt are definitely among the top teams in the country and are significantly better then both MSU and Purdue.  I still don't know about Lville - they are capable of being great but they don't seem to be the smartest team around.  After that, there's Nova and us.  I think Purdue would fit right in with us and would finish anywhere from 4th to 7th in the BE.
"Yes, Dinnertime!  The perfect break between work and drunk" - Homer J. Simpson

bamamarquettefan

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1299
  • pudner-at-aspen-ideas-festival.jpg
    • Value Add Basketball
Re: Today's ESPN Bracketology...
« Reply #37 on: March 02, 2009, 03:04:17 PM »
Michigan State and Purdue are both tall teams - top 50 by kenpom.com's calculations, and we have had more trouble with tall teams - even weak ones like DePaul.  Last year we drew the tallest team in the country in the 2nd round in Stanford, and played a great game but fell just short.  We just played the tallest team in the country this year, UConn.

What I think we want to avoid is a big point guard who can score like UConn's Price, because that's the only place where I really think Mo will be a liability, and we might just have to go with Butler in the starting 5.  I love Butler as a starter, but am concerned that if Wes or Jerel are bringing the ball up the court they won't be scoring as much.
The www.valueaddsports.com analysis of basketball, football and baseball players are intended to neither be too hot or too cold - hundreds immerse themselves in studies of stats not of interest to broader fan bases (too hot), while others still insist on pure observation (too cold).

AlumKCof93

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 926
Re: Today's ESPN Bracketology...
« Reply #38 on: March 02, 2009, 03:10:37 PM »
From Acker's perspective, isn't anyone taller than 5"11" a big point guard?
"Yes, Dinnertime!  The perfect break between work and drunk" - Homer J. Simpson

 

feedback