collapse

Resources

Stud of Indiana Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross2

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Return of Buzz by willie warrior
[Today at 04:05:40 PM]


Trojans SOTG by Jay Bee
[Today at 03:55:59 PM]


5th Year, so judge by tower912
[Today at 03:38:25 PM]


Revenue sharing by Jay Bee
[Today at 03:37:28 PM]


[Paint Touches] Marquette Minutes Projections for 2026 by Jay Bee
[Today at 02:26:26 PM]


Rollin’ Rock by BM1090
[Today at 01:32:22 PM]


Hoosier beat down by tower912
[Today at 01:06:37 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Maryland

Marquette
89
Marquette vs.
Maryland
Date/Time: Nov 15, 2025, 1:00pm
TV: Peacock
Schedule for 2025-26
Little Rock
49

chapman

Quote from: ErickJD08 on March 02, 2009, 12:13:54 AM
Man... Why do you even watch?  You are so po'ed because we lost to two of the best teams in the country.  Even with DJ, we were not going to be favored in these three games.  Even with DJ, we were not National Championship favorites, contenders, final four contenders, BE champs favorites, or even BE Tourney Champ favorites (from a media viewpoint).  

So are we worse off without DJ... without a doubt.  I think the point of the thread is that fans have been worried about how the team will play without DJ.  Going toe to toe with two of the best teams in the country means that there is some hope left in the season.  I think we will win against Cuse.  Get a bye bye (cus Nova will lose to ND). and we will win our first game of the BE tourney and pray for the best the rest of the way through.

Like I said, I don't really do the "feel good loss" column.  There's no asterisk next to a loss saying "well they played hard, and Mo Acker was really good with his 3 points and 3 assists in 32 minutes".  You play to win the game.  I'm far more pessimistic based on what I've seen, so I guess I'm going to disagree with just about everyone (Buzz and the NYT included) that we've shown anything to write home about.  I see a team that's now down to playing with four capable players, and those four might have the fight to play close games with anyone but they really don't have a chance to beat a lot of teams.  I hope I'm proven wrong, but I think it's going to take results, rather than effort, from someone other than exhausted seniors that are pressing too hard.

g0lden3agle

Quote from: chapman on March 02, 2009, 10:25:50 AM
Like I said, I don't really do the "feel good loss" column.  There's no asterisk next to a loss saying "well they played hard, and Mo Acker was really good with his 3 points and 3 assists in 32 minutes".  You play to win the game.  I'm far more pessimistic based on what I've seen, so I guess I'm going to disagree with just about everyone (Buzz and the NYT included) that we've shown anything to write home about.  I see a team that's now down to playing with four capable players, and those four might have the fight to play close games with anyone but they really don't have a chance to beat a lot of teams.  I hope I'm proven wrong, but I think it's going to take results, rather than effort, from someone other than exhausted seniors that are pressing too hard.

What were your expectations of a Dominic-less team prior to this game and now that you've seen them play a game with some minor preparation time?

Previous topic - Next topic